Best open-source pedestrian detection library for commercial use?

本文寻找最适合商业用途的实时图像行人检测软件,并倾向于易于集成到ROS的C++实现。作者对比了多种开源库,包括OpenCV HOG实现、SPENCER及Munaro等方案,最终推荐使用dlib库的HOG+SVM实现。

摘要生成于 C知道 ,由 DeepSeek-R1 满血版支持, 前往体验 >

Best open-source pedestrian detection library for commercial use?

asked Aug 19 '15

Tommi gravatar image

Hi there,

I'm looking for the best real-time image-based people detection software that is available for commercial use, and easily integrated to ROS. So preferably C++ with a simple structure and clear documentation. I know the state-of-art in people detection; it's easily available from surveys, e.g.

image description

What I would like to have is something similar to the algorithms marked M-Q in the image. However, all seem to be shared with a non-commercial license.

Here is what I've come up so far:

  1. OpenCV HOG implementation as ROS package -- however, basic HOG is probably not very accuratehttps://github.com/angusleigh/hog_haa...
  2. SPENCER implementation -- again, just basic HOG? Plus, it's an EU project.https://github.com/spencer-project/sp...
  3. Munaro et al -- basic Haar & HOG?https://github.com/ros-industrial/hum...

As a bonus, a good tracker that is integrated with the detector would be nice, but not it's not required.

Comments

Can you comment on why you feel they "all seem to be shared with a non-commercial license"? Some open-source licenses explicitly allow commercial use, with just the requirement that you mention the use of the those libraries / dependencies. They don't require you to make your work open source.

gvdhoorn gravatar image gvdhoorn  (Aug 24 '15)

They explicitly mention that the code is shared for research use only.

Tommi gravatar image Tommi  (Aug 25 '15)

All of them? Are these actual open-source licenses then?

gvdhoorn gravatar image gvdhoorn  (Aug 25 '15)

1 answer

Sort by » oldest newest most voted
1

answered Sep 14 '15

Tommi gravatar image

I spent some time reading the FPDW and VeryFast papers. The conclusion is that they are mostly performance optimizations and small tweaks, while the fundamental detector is still HOG. Also, the classifier (SVM, NN, decision forest) does not make a huge difference. Therefore, I decided to go with HOG+SVM because it's fast and simple, and I found a good implementation from http://dlib.net . Example:http://blog.dlib.net/2014/02/dlib-186... Dlib uses an improved version of HOG, by Felzenszwalb et al. Also, performance _should_ be better than OpenCV.

link

Your Answer

Please start posting anonymously - your entry will be published after you log in or create a new account.

评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值