1.
(1)Show that this theorem is a corollary to the Turan theorem for cliques.
According to the third proof (the probabilistic method),we can change the Claim:
to
σ(G)repensents the number of vertices in an independent set.
So, it’s a corollary to the Turan theorem.
(2)Prove the theorem directly for the independent sets by the probabilistic method along with the Cauchy-Schwartz theorem, without using the Turan theorem.
We prove this by the probabilistic method. Fix a random ordering of vertices inV,sayv1,v2,…,vn. We construct an independent set as follows:
σ(G)=∅
while G!=∅
{
∀vi∈G
σ(G)+=vi
G=G−vi -all neighbour of vi
}
Let Xv be the random variable that indicates whether v∈σ(G), i.e.,
σ(G)=S
Note that a vertex v∈S The probability that v is ranked is 11+dv. Thus,
Observe that |S|=∑v∈VXv.Due to linearity of expectation,
Apply the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality
Set av=1+dv‾‾‾‾‾‾√and bv=11+dv√, then avbv=1and so
so we have |S|≥n22m+n
2 according to Sunflower Lemma (Erdős-Rado)
Let ⊆(Xk). If ||>k!(r−1)k,then contains a sunflower of size r.
Edge implies k=2
because >2(r−1)2
contains a sunflower of size r
if core ∅ ,then it’s a match, else it’s a star.
3.
(1)proof by contradiction:
fix B,suppose
suppose xi⊂xj, we have xi⊂Aj, which contradicts with A∩B⊄C for any A,B,C∈.
so,S is an anti chain.
(2)because the k-uniform(Xk)is an antichain
is antichain
According to theorem (Sperner)
Let ⊆2X where|X|=n. If is an antichain, then
||≤(n⌊n/2⌋).
because n=k, we have||≤1+(k⌊k/2⌋).
4.
Consider that
for every item c in
|1|=||⊆([n]n−k)
we have t=n−k,n>2t
since A∪B≠[n] for all A,B∈
A1∩B1≠∅ for all A1,B1∈1,
1 is intersecting
according to Erdős–Ko–Rado theorem
Let 1⊆([n]t) and n≥2t. If is intersecting, then |1|≤(n−1t−1).
so we have |1|=||≤(n−1t−1)
(n−1t−1)=(1−kn)(nk).
so, ||≤(1−kn)(nk)