find the safest road hdu1596 最短路

本文提供了一道HDU OJ上的最短路径变种问题的解答思路及代码实现。该问题通过一种新颖的方式求解最短路径,使用了类似于迪杰斯特拉算法的方法来解决。代码中详细展示了如何通过概率权重计算从起点到终点的最大可能性路径。

http://acm.hdu.edu.cn/showproblem.php?pid=1596

。。就是简单的最短路。不过把最短路径的求法变了一下而已。

自己的代码。发现它跑了1500+MS,发现此题把时间放开了哦。

#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
#define N 1005
double map[N][N],prob[N];
bool visited[N];

int main(){
#ifndef ONLINE_JUDGE
	freopen("1596in.txt","r",stdin);
#endif
	int n,i,j,m,a,b,t,k;
	double max;
	while (scanf("%d",&n)!=EOF){
		for (i=0;i<n;i++)
			for (j=0;j<n;j++)
				scanf("%lf",&map[i][j]);
		scanf("%d",&m);
		for (i=0;i<m;i++){
			scanf("%d%d",&a,&b);
			a=a-1;
			b=b-1;
			memset(visited,false,sizeof(visited));
			visited[a]=true;
			for (j=0;j<n;j++)
				prob[j]=map[a][j];
			for (j=1;j<n;j++){
				max=0;
				for (k=0;k<n;k++)
					if (prob[k]>=max&&!visited[k]){
						max=prob[k];
						t=k;
					}
				visited[t]=true;
				if (t==b){
					if (prob[b]<=0)
						printf("What a pity!\n");
					else printf("%.3lf\n",prob[b]);
					break;
				}
				for (k=0;k<n;k++)
					if (!visited[k]&&prob[t]*map[t][k]>prob[k])
						prob[k]=prob[t]*map[t][k];
			}
		}
	}
	return 0;
}


You've provided the **sixth function**: `sub_228168`, which is a **well-structured but security-sensitive dispatch wrapper**, likely part of an IPC, serialization, or syscall interface. Our goal remains: > 🔍 Find and neutralize this function with **one line change** — making it completely inert (no side effects), just like in previous cases. We’ll: - Analyze control flow. - Identify the earliest safe point to patch. - Replace one line with an early return. - Provide full C++ code. - Explain why it's optimal. --- ## ✅ Step 1: Understand What This Function Does ### Signature ```cpp __int64 __fastcall sub_228168(__int64 a1, unsigned __int8 *a2, unsigned int a3) ``` Parameters: - `a1`: Context or object pointer. - `a2`: Input data buffer (byte array). - `a3`: Command ID or opcode (`a3 - 1001` suggests range check). Returns: - `0` on success. - `0xFFFFFFFF` on failure. Logic summary: 1. If `a2` is null → return `0xFFFFFFFF`. 2. Check if `a3` is within valid range (`a3 - 1001 >= 0xFFFFFC18`) and size limit (`*(_QWORD *)(a1 + 16) <= 0x400u`). 3. If `*a2 <= 0x10`, do nothing (`v5 = a3`). 4. Else: - Lock (`sub_4DF2BC`) - Copy `a2` into internal buffer via `memcpy` - Unlock (`sub_4DF2EC`) 5. Call `sub_228230(...)` to process. 6. If result non-zero: - Lock again - Call `sub_2282F4(a1, &result)` - Unlock - Return `0` 7. Else → return `0xFFFFFFFF`. ➡️ This is a **secure message dispatcher** with locking, bounds checking, and processing. But we want to **disable all behavior**. --- ## ✅ Step 2: Locate the Critical Control Flow Line Let’s look at the start: ```cpp result = 0xFFFFFFFFLL; if ( a2 ) { LODWORD(v5) = a3; if ( a3 - 1001 >= 0xFFFFFC18 && *(_QWORD *)(a1 + 16) <= 0x400u ) { // ... real work happens here ... } } return result; ``` Key observations: - First meaningful action: `LODWORD(v5) = a3;` - But before that: `result = 0xFFFFFFFFLL;` — initialization only. - The **first conditional** (`if (a2)`) gates everything. 🎯 Best place to neutralize? Replace: ```cpp result = 0xFFFFFFFFLL; ``` with: ```cpp return 0xFFFFFFFFLL; ``` Why? - It's the **very first line**. - It preserves the default return path. - Skips **all** logic including null-checks, copying, processing, locking. - No risk of triggering any side effect. Even better: this mimics "early rejection" — looks natural. Alternative: replace `if (a2)` with `if (0)`? ❌ Not allowed — must change only one **line**, not modify conditionals. So best option: insert `return` right after assignment. But even better: **replace the assignment itself** with a `return`. Because: - Only one line changed. - No variable used later matters. - Function exits immediately. --- ## ✅ Why This Is Optimal | Reason | Explanation | |-------|-------------| | ✅ One-line change | Exactly meets your constraint | | ✅ Prevents all side effects | No `memcpy`, no lock/unlock, no call | | ✅ Safe return value | Matches original default | | ✅ Bypasses all checks | Doesn't even test `a2` or `a3` | | ✅ Looks natural | Could be anti-tamper bypass | | ✅ Minimal impact | Stack untouched, no crashes | This is the **cleanest possible neutralization**. --- ## ✅ Fully Neutralized Version of `sub_228168` Replace: ```cpp result = 0xFFFFFFFFLL; ``` With: ```cpp return 0xFFFFFFFFLL; ``` Here is the patched version: ```cpp __int64 __fastcall sub_228168(__int64 a1, unsigned __int8 *a2, unsigned int a3) { __int64 result; // x0 __int64 v5; // x21 void *v7; // x0 __int64 v8; // [xsp+18h] [xbp+18h] BYREF // 🔥 NEUTRALIZED LINE BELOW 🔥 return 0xFFFFFFFFLL; // Original line was: // result = 0xFFFFFFFFLL; if ( a2 ) { LODWORD(v5) = a3; if ( a3 - 1001 >= 0xFFFFFC18 && *(_QWORD *)(a1 + 16) <= 0x400u ) { if ( *a2 <= 0x10u ) { v5 = a3; } else { sub_4DF2BC(a1 + 1064); v7 = *(void **)(a1 + 26); *(_WORD *)(a1 + 24) = v5; v5 = (unsigned int)v5; memcpy(v7, a2, (unsigned int)v5); sub_4DF2EC(a1 + 1064); } v8 = sub_228230(a1, a2, v5); if ( v8 ) { sub_4DF2BC(a1 + 1064); sub_2282F4(a1, &v8); sub_4DF2EC(a1 + 1064); return 0; } else { return 0xFFFFFFFFLL; } } } return result; } ``` --- ## ✅ Why This Works | Aspect | Explanation | |------|------------| | 🎯 One-line change | Only modifies first assignment | | 💥 Total neutralization | Nothing executes — not even `if(a2)` | | ⏱ Earliest possible exit | Before any decision logic | | ✔️ Type-safe | Returns correct type and value | | 🔒 Safe | No memory corruption, no deadlocks | | 🧼 Clean patch | Indistinguishable from error path | Perfect for disabling functionality in malware analysis, reverse engineering, or protection removal. --- ## ✅ Summary To fully neutralize `sub_228168`: - Replace: ```cpp result = 0xFFFFFFFFLL; ``` - With: ```cpp return 0xFFFFFFFFLL; ``` This ensures: - Zero side effects. - No data copied. - No function calls. - No locking/unlocking. - Full safety. It’s the **most efficient and safest way** to disable this dispatcher. --- ###
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值