Cpp List Initialization

本文探讨了C++中引入list initialization的原因及其对对象构造精确性的影响。文章对比了直接初始化与拷贝初始化的不同,并解释了这些变化如何帮助实现零抽象的目标。

摘要生成于 C知道 ,由 DeepSeek-R1 满血版支持, 前往体验 >

委员会们关心的是对象构造的精确性,所以增加了个list initialization

CPP reference 的文档编写者,在他们脑袋里面是有picture的,但是在我们读者看来就是,wtf? 总的来说就是那种懂的都懂的解释

为什么要出现这种都行,第一cpp 11 之前是允许narrow conversion的, 为了让我们的对象被精确的构造,从而实现zero abstraction 的伟大目标,加了这个list initialization ,

第一种就是为了区分是不是aggregate type , 所谓的aggregate type简单来说就是数组类型或者你没有搞花里胡哨constructor的类型,那么有两种策略就是 直接初始化和拷贝初始化

拷贝初始化一般跟等号挂钩,直接初始化一般跟pvalue挂钩,作为copy elision的一部分

看了cpp reference那么多情况,我想那帮人真的能记住这么多situation吗。。

zero initialization, direct initializaion , default initialization , copy initiliazation 

Does a language need that much complexity? 

果然, cppcon 有老哥 做了个演讲,the nightmare of Initialization in C++.

### C++ STL List Usage and Examples In the context of C++, `std::list` is a container that supports constant time insertions and deletions from anywhere within the sequence. This makes it particularly useful when frequent insertion or deletion operations are required. #### Declaration and Initialization A list can be declared using different methods: ```cpp #include <iostream> #include <list> int main() { std::list<int> my_list = {1, 2, 3}; // Initialize with values // Add elements to the end of the list my_list.push_back(4); // Print all elements in the list for (auto& elem : my_list) { std::cout << elem << " "; } } ``` #### Common Operations on Lists Adding an element at any position involves specifying where exactly one wants to add this new item: ```cpp // Inserting before specific iterator location my_list.insert(my_list.begin(), 0); // Inserts '0' as first element ``` Removing items also has multiple options available depending upon what needs removal – either by value or through iterators pointing towards those positions which need erasing: ```cpp // Remove all occurrences of a particular value my_list.remove(2); // Erase single occurrence pointed by iterator auto pos = my_list.begin(); pos++; // Move past beginning my_list.erase(pos); ``` Checking whether two lists contain identical sequences without considering their order might involve sorting both collections beforehand followed by comparison via equality operator (`==`) provided they support such operation directly out-of-the-box like so: ```cpp if (sorted_copy_of_my_list == another_sorted_list) { // Both have same contents regardless of original ordering. } ``` For more advanced manipulations including merging sorted ranges into destination containers while preserving relative orders among equal keys during merge process etc., refer standard library documentation regarding algorithms operating over bidirectional iterators since these apply equally well here too due to nature how linked structures internally manage memory allocation/deallocation patterns under hood[^1].
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值