134. Gas Station

本文探讨了一种特定的环路加油问题,即在一个无限油箱容量的车辆上,从N个加油站出发,每个加油站提供一定数量的汽油并消耗一定的成本到达下一个站点。文章提出了两种解决思路,并给出了具体的算法实现。

There are N gas stations along a circular route, where the amount of gas at station i is gas[i].

You have a car with an unlimited gas tank and it costs cost[i] of gas to travel from station i to its next station (i+1). You begin the journey with an empty tank at one of the gas stations.

Return the starting gas station's index if you can travel around the circuit once, otherwise return -1.

Note:

The solution is guaranteed to be unique.


https://discuss.leetcode.com/topic/1344/share-some-of-my-ideas


I have thought for a long time and got two ideas:

  • If car starts at A and can not reach B. Any station between A and B
    can not reach B.(B is the first station that A can not reach.)
  • If the total number of gas is bigger than the total number of cost. There must be a solution.
  • (Should I prove them?)


public int canCompleteCircuit(int[] gas, int[] cost) {
    int sumGas = 0;
    int sumCost = 0;
    int start = 0;
    int tank = 0;
    for (int i = 0; i < gas.length; i++) {
        sumGas += gas[i];
        sumCost += cost[i];
        tank += gas[i] - cost[i];
        if (tank < 0) {
            start = i + 1;
            tank = 0;
        }
    }
    if (sumGas < sumCost) {
        return -1;
    } else {
        return start;
    }
}

The reason why I think this works:
1, if sum of gas is more than sum of cost, then there must be a solution. And the question guaranteed that the solution is unique(The first one I found is the right one).
2, The tank should never be negative, so restart whenever there is a negative number.



Proof to the first point: say there is a point C between A and B -- that is A can reach C but cannot reach B. Since A cannot reach B, the gas collected between A and B is short of the cost. Starting from A, at the time when the car reaches C, it brings in gas >= 0, and the car still cannot reach B. Thus if the car just starts from C, it definitely cannot reach B.

Proof for the second point:

  • If there is only one gas station, it’s true.
  • If there are two gas stations a and b, and gas(a) cannot afford cost(a), i.e., gas(a) < cost(a), then gas(b) must be greater than cost(b), i.e., gas(b) > cost(b), since gas(a) + gas(b) > cost(a) + cost(b); so there must be a way too.
  • If there are three gas stations a, b, and c, where gas(a) < cost(a), i.e., we cannot travel from a to b directly, then:
  • either if gas(b) < cost(b), i.e., we cannot travel from b to c directly, then cost(c) > cost(c), so we can start at c and travel to a; since gas(b) < cost(b), gas(c) + gas(a) must be greater than cost(c) + cost(a), so we can continue traveling from a to b. Key Point: this can be considered as there is one station at c’ with gas(c’) = gas(c) + gas(a) and the cost from c’ to b is cost(c’) = cost(c) + cost(a), and the problem reduces to a problem with two stations. This in turn becomes the problem with two stations above.
  • or if gas(b) >= cost(b), we can travel from b to c directly. Similar to the case above, this problem can reduce to a problem with two stations b’ and a, where gas(b’) = gas(b) + gas(c) and cost(b’) = cost(b) + cost(c). Since gas(a) < cost(a), gas(b’) must be greater than cost(b’), so it’s solved too.
  • For problems with more stations, we can reduce them in a similar way. In fact, as seen above for the example of three stations, the problem of two stations can also reduce to the initial problem with one station.

评论
成就一亿技术人!
拼手气红包6.0元
还能输入1000个字符
 
红包 添加红包
表情包 插入表情
 条评论被折叠 查看
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值