Unity3D - RigidBody vs Collider

本文介绍了在Unity中如何使用碰撞体(Collider)与刚体(Rigidbody),即使没有刚体也可以存在碰撞体,Unity会认为这样的物体是静态不可移动的。而为物体配备刚体组件则开启了该物体与其他碰撞体之间的碰撞检测。

转自RigidBody vs Collider


You can indeed have a collider with no rigidbody. If there's no rigidbody then Unity assumes the object is static, non-moving. Unity does not bother testing for collisions BETWEEN static objects. As you can imagine, this is very efficient if you have lots of scenery the player can bump into.


So the purpose of having a kinematic rigidbody, rather than no rigidbody, is to turn on collision detection between this object and all other colliders in the scene (even the static ones.) Effectively you are letting Unity know that this object moves around, so Unity will then do collision-detection between it and everything else.


(If you had a game with only two objects in it, and both move kinematically, in theory you would only need a rigidbody on one of them, even though they both move. I haven't tried it. But now imagine three such objects- you'd have to have rigidbodies on two of them. So in practice you'll usually just put rigidbodies on everything that both moves and collides.)

内容概要:本文系统介绍了算术优化算法(AOA)的基本原理、核心思想及Python实现方法,并通过图像分割的实际案例展示了其应用价值。AOA是一种基于种群的元启发式算法,其核心思想来源于四则运算,利用乘除运算进行全局勘探,加减运算进行局部开发,通过数学优化器加速函数(MOA)和数学优化概率(MOP)动态控制搜索过程,在全局探索与局部开发之间实现平衡。文章详细解析了算法的初始化、勘探与开发阶段的更新策略,并提供了完整的Python代码实现,结合Rastrigin函数进行测试验证。进一步地,以Flask框架搭建前后端分离系统,将AOA应用于图像分割任务,展示了其在实际工程中的可行性与高效性。最后,通过收敛速度、寻优精度等指标评估算法性能,并提出自适应参数调整、模型优化和并行计算等改进策略。; 适合人群:具备一定Python编程基础和优化算法基础知识的高校学生、科研人员及工程技术人员,尤其适合从事人工智能、图像处理、智能优化等领域的从业者;; 使用场景及目标:①理解元启发式算法的设计思想与实现机制;②掌握AOA在函数优化、图像分割等实际问题中的建模与求解方法;③学习如何将优化算法集成到Web系统中实现工程化应用;④为算法性能评估与改进提供实践参考; 阅读建议:建议读者结合代码逐行调试,深入理解算法流程中MOA与MOP的作用机制,尝试在不同测试函数上运行算法以观察性能差异,并可进一步扩展图像分割模块,引入更复杂的预处理或后处理技术以提升分割效果。
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值