留个VKProxy性能测试记录

基准项目

一切从简，就选大家都熟悉的初始demo项目做基准好了

[ApiController] [Route("[controller]")] public class WeatherForecastController : ControllerBase { private static readonly string[] Summaries = new[] { "Freezing", "Bracing", "Chilly", "Cool", "Mild", "Warm", "Balmy", "Hot", "Sweltering", "Scorching" }; private readonly ILogger<WeatherForecastController> _logger; public WeatherForecastController(ILogger<WeatherForecastController> logger) { _logger = logger; } [HttpGet(Name = "GetWeatherForecast")] public IEnumerable<WeatherForecast> Get() { this.Response.Headers["x-p"] = this.Request.Protocol; return Enumerable.Range(1, 5).Select(index => new WeatherForecast { Date = DateOnly.FromDateTime(DateTime.Now.AddDays(index)), TemperatureC = Random.Shared.Next(-20, 55), Summary = Summaries[Random.Shared.Next(Summaries.Length)] }) .ToArray(); } }

代理配置

启动最简单的代理配置（主要想看看最理想情况下的结果）

{ "Logging": { "LogLevel": { "Default": "Warning" } }, "ServerOptions": { "AddServerHeader": false }, "ReverseProxy": { "ConnectionTimeout": "00:00:01.000", "Listen": { "https": { "Protocols": [ "Http1", "Http2", "Http3" ], "Address": [ "127.0.0.1:5001" ], "UseSni": true, "SniId": "test" }, "http": { "Protocols": [ "Http1" ], "Address": [ "127.0.0.1:5000" ] }, "tcptest": { "Protocols": [ "Tcp" ], "Address": [ "127.0.0.1:5002" ], "RouteId": "tcpTest" } }, "Sni": { "test": { "Host": [ "*" ], "CheckCertificateRevocation": false, "Certificate": { "PEM": "-----BEGIN CERTIFICATE-----xxxxx\n-----END CERTIFICATE-----", "PEMKey": "-----BEGIN ENCRYPTED PRIVATE KEY-----\nxxxx\n-----END ENCRYPTED PRIVATE KEY-----", "Password": "testPassword" } } }, "Routes": { "HTTPTEST": { "Match": { "Hosts": [ "*" ], "Paths": [ "*" ] }, "ClusterId": "apidemo", "Timeout": "00:10:11" }, "tcpTest": { "ClusterId": "apidemo", "Timeout": "00:10:11" } }, "Clusters": { "apidemo": { "HttpClientConfig": { "DangerousAcceptAnyServerCertificate": true }, "LoadBalancingPolicy": "RoundRobin", "Destinations": [ { "Address": "https://127.0.0.1:4001" } ] } } } }

vkproxy -c D:\code\github\VKProxy\samples\CoreDemo\test.json

测试工具

这里会在本人电脑内测试理想情况，主要没有精力去搭建真实网络环境测试（贫穷的眼泪），哈哈

个人电脑情况： Windows 11 (10.0.26100.4351) Intel Core i7-10700 CPU 2.90GHz, 1 CPU, 16 logical and 8 physical cores 32G Memory INTEL SSDPEKNW512GB

以前用过 ali 这个go写的测试工具，因为它会实时在命令行终端绘制性能测试图，在简单测试使用很方便，但可惜断更了，并且有个大bug没有修复：绘制的性能测试图错位了，非常影响观看，非常惋惜呀

所以这里找了个同样go写的工具 vegeta 主要看重它有命令可以生成图， 但可惜好像不支持 http3

测试命令

// 性能测试 .\vegeta.exe attack -insecure -rate=10000/s -duration=60s -format=http -targets=test -output=results -http2 // 汇总报告 .\vegeta.exe report .\results // 绘图 .\vegeta.exe plot .\results > plot.html

测试结果

基准 HTTP2 -> WeatherForecast api

.\vegeta.exe attack -insecure -rate=10000/s -duration=60s -format=http -targets=base -output=baseresults -http2 // base content: // GET https://127.0.0.1:4001/WeatherForecast

汇总

Requests [total, rate, throughput] 599930, 9998.35, 9998.35 Duration [total, attack, wait] 1m0s, 1m0s, 0s Latencies [min, mean, 50, 90, 95, 99, max] 0s, 676.024µs, 0s, 2.56ms, 3.705ms, 5.367ms, 26.437ms Bytes In [total, mean] 232052167, 386.80 Bytes Out [total, mean] 0, 0.00 Success [ratio] 100.00% Status Codes [code:count] 200:599930 Error Set:

HTTP2 -> VKProxy(https) -> HTTP2 -> WeatherForecast api

.\vegeta.exe attack -insecure -rate=10000/s -duration=60s -format=http -targets=http2proxy -output=http2proxyresults -http2 // http2proxy content: // GET https://127.0.0.1:5001/WeatherForecast

汇总

Requests [total, rate, throughput] 599980, 9999.85, 9999.85 Duration [total, attack, wait] 59.999s, 59.999s, 0s Latencies [min, mean, 50, 90, 95, 99, max] 0s, 2.199ms, 1.845ms, 5.162ms, 6.359ms, 9.217ms, 108.78ms Bytes In [total, mean] 232078680, 386.81 Bytes Out [total, mean] 0, 0.00 Success [ratio] 100.00% Status Codes [code:count] 200:599980 Error Set:

HTTP2 -> VKProxy(tcp) -> scoket -> WeatherForecast api

.\vegeta.exe attack -insecure -rate=10000/s -duration=60s -format=http -targets=tcpproxy -output=tcpproxyresults -http2 // tcpproxy content: // GET https://127.0.0.1:5002/WeatherForecast

汇总

Requests [total, rate, throughput] 599976, 9998.48, 9998.48 Duration [total, attack, wait] 1m0s, 1m0s, 0s Latencies [min, mean, 50, 90, 95, 99, max] 0s, 1.809ms, 1.004ms, 4.736ms, 5.744ms, 8.995ms, 98.922ms Bytes In [total, mean] 232069758, 386.80 Bytes Out [total, mean] 0, 0.00 Success [ratio] 100.00% Status Codes [code:count] 200:599976 Error Set:

结果大致就是这样了，看起来个人写的代码也不至于太臭，至少理想情况下没有拖慢多少，

客官，你们怎么看？