RFC3261: SIP:26.1.3 篡改信息主体

26.1.3 Tampering with Message Bodies
26.1.3 篡改信息主体

   As a matter of course, SIP UAs route requests through trusted proxy servers.  Regardless of how that trust is established (authentication of proxies is discussed elsewhere in this section), a UA may trust a proxy server to route a request, but not to inspect or possibly modify the bodies contained in that request.

当然,SIP UA通过可信代理服务器路由请求。无论该信任是如何建立的(本节其他部分讨论了代理的身份验证),UA都可以信任代理服务器来路由请求,但不能检查或可能修改该请求中包含的主体。

   Consider a UA that is using SIP message bodies to communicate session encryption keys for a media session.  Although it trusts the proxy server of the domain it is contacting to deliver signaling properly, it may not want the administrators of that domain to be capable of decrypting any subsequent media session.  Worse yet, if the proxy server were actively malicious, it could modify the session key, either acting as a man-in-the-middle, or perhaps changing the security characteristics requested by the originating UA.

考虑一个UA,它正在使用SIP消息体来传递媒体会话的会话加密密钥。尽管它信任它所联系的域的代理服务器来正确地传递信号,但它可能不希望该域的管理员能够解密任何后续的媒体会话。更糟糕的是,如果代理服务器是主动恶意的,它可能会修改会话密钥,或者充当中间人,或者可能更改发起UA请求的安全特性。

   This family of threats applies not only to session keys, but to most conceivable forms of content carried end-to-end in SIP.  These might include MIME bodies that should be rendered to the user, SDP, or encapsulated telephony signals, among others.  Attackers might attempt to modify SDP bodies, for example, in order to point RTP media streams to a wiretapping device in order to eavesdrop on subsequent voice communications.

这一系列威胁不仅适用于会话密钥,而且适用于SIP中端到端携带的大多数可能形式的内容。其中可能包括应呈现给用户的MIME主体、SDP或封装的电话信号等。例如,攻击者可能试图修改SDP主体,以便将RTP媒体流指向窃听设备,从而窃听后续的语音通信。

   Also note that some header fields in SIP are meaningful end-to-end, for example, Subject.  UAs might be protective of these header fields as well as bodies (a malicious intermediary changing the Subject header field might make an important request appear to be spam, for example).  However, since many header fields are legitimately inspected or altered by proxy servers as a request is routed, not all header fields should be secured end-to-end.

还要注意,SIP中的一些报头字段是有意义的端到端字段,例如Subject。UA可能会保护这些报头字段和主体(例如,恶意中介更改Subject报头字段可能会使重要请求看起来像垃圾邮件)。然而,由于在路由请求时,代理服务器会合法地检查或更改许多报头字段,因此并非所有报头字段都应该端到端保护。

   For these reasons, the UA might want to secure SIP message bodies, and in some limited cases header fields, end-to-end.  The security services required for bodies include confidentiality, integrity, and authentication.  These end-to-end services should be independent of the means used to secure interactions with intermediaries such as proxy servers.

由于这些原因,UA可能希望端到端地保护SIP消息体,并且在某些有限的情况下保护报头字段。机构所需的安全服务包括保密性、完整性和身份验证。这些端到端服务应该独立于用于保护与中介(如代理服务器)交互的手段。

(SCI三维路径规划对比)25年最新五种智能算法优化解决无人机路径巡检三维路径规划对比(灰雁算法真菌算法吕佩尔狐阳光生长研究(Matlab代码实现)内容概要:本文档主要介绍了一项关于无人机三维路径巡检规划的研究,通过对比2025年最新的五种智能优化算法(包括灰雁算法、真菌算法、吕佩尔狐算法、阳光生长算法等),在复杂三维环境中优化无人机巡检路径的技术方案。所有算法均通过Matlab代码实现,并重点围绕路径安全性、效率、能耗和避障能力进行性能对比分析,旨在为无人机在实际巡检任务中的路径规划提供科学依据和技术支持。文档还展示了多个相关科研方向的案例与代码资源,涵盖路径规划、智能优化、无人机控制等多个领域。; 适合人群:具备一定Matlab编程基础,从事无人机路径规划、智能优化算法研究或自动化、控制工程方向的研究生、科研人员及工程技术人员。; 使用场景及目标:① 对比分析新型智能算法在三维复杂环境下无人机路径规划的表现差异;② 为科研项目提供可复现的算法代码与实验基准;③ 支持无人机巡检、灾害监测、电力线路巡查等实际应用场景的路径优化需求; 阅读建议:建议结合文档提供的Matlab代码进行仿真实验,重点关注不同算法在收敛速度、路径长度和避障性能方面的表现差异,同时参考文中列举的其他研究案例拓展思路,提升科研创新能力。
评论
成就一亿技术人!
拼手气红包6.0元
还能输入1000个字符
 
红包 添加红包
表情包 插入表情
 条评论被折叠 查看
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值