[OT]My Answer
/**
* Definition for singly-linked list.
* public class ListNode {
* int val;
* ListNode next;
* ListNode() {}
* ListNode(int val) { this.val = val; }
* ListNode(int val, ListNode next) { this.val = val; this.next = next; }
* }
*/
class Solution {
public ListNode rotateRight(ListNode head, int k) {
if(head == null || head.next == null){
return head;
}
int store = 0;
ListNode p;
for(int i = 0; i < k; i++){
p = head;
store = p.val;
while(p.next != null){
int tmp = p.next.val;
p.next.val = store;
store = tmp;
p = p.next;
}
head.val = store;
}
return head;
}
}
第一次写出来,能够解出符合要求的结果,但是超时了,因为循环的次数等于右移次数,若是右移次数相当大,则耗时很高。后考虑到移动次数较高时移动是循环进行的,可以先得到链表的长度,后让右移次数对长度取余,修改后的结果如下:
/**
* Definition for singly-linked list.
* public class ListNode {
* int val;
* ListNode next;
* ListNode() {}
* ListNode(int val) { this.val = val; }
* ListNode(int val, ListNode next) { this.val = val; this.next = next; }
* }
*/
class Solution {
public ListNode rotateRight(ListNode head, int k) {
if(head == null || head.next == null){
return head;
}
int store = 0;
ListNode p = head;
int num = 1;
while(p.next != null){
num++;
p = p.next;
}
int times = k % num;
for(int i = 0; i < times; i++){
p = head;
store = p.val;
while(p.next != null){
int tmp = p.next.val;
p.next.val = store;
store = tmp;
p = p.next;
}
head.val = store;
}
return head;
}
}
修改后 AC 了,然而时间复杂度只超过了 8 % 的人,说明效率很低。
题解
连接成环
class Solution {
public ListNode rotateRight(ListNode head, int k) {
if (k == 0 || head == null || head.next == null) {
return head;
}
int n = 1;
ListNode iter = head;
while (iter.next != null) {
iter = iter.next;
n++;
}
int add = n - k % n;
if (add == n) {
return head;
}
iter.next = head;
while (add-- > 0) {
iter = iter.next;
}
ListNode ret = iter.next;
iter.next = null;
return ret;
}
}
将单链表连接成环后,只需要移动指针到合适位置,然后断开环即可。
博客探讨了如何优化链表旋转算法,从最初的实现导致超时问题,到通过计算链表长度和取模减少循环次数实现AC,最后采用连接成环的方法在O(1)时间内完成旋转,显著提高了效率。
1308

被折叠的 条评论
为什么被折叠?



