论文语句摘录（一）

来源：A Review of Flood Loss Models as Basis for Harmonization and Benchmarking.（https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0159791）

1.Despite considerable progress in the development of loss estimation tools since the 1980s, loss estimates still reflect high uncertainties and disparities that often lead to questioning their quality.

翻译：尽管自20世纪80年代以来损失估计工具的开发取得了相当大的进展，但损失估计仍然反映出高度的不确定性和差异，这往往会导致对其质量的质疑。

2.more effort is needed to quantify uncertainties and undertake validations. Due to a lack of detailed and reliable flood loss data, first order validations are difficult to accomplish, so that model comparisons in terms of benchmarking are essential

翻译：需要更多的努力来量化不确定性并进行验证。由于缺乏详细可靠的洪水损失数据，一阶验证难以完成，因此在基准方面进行模型比较是必要的。

3.When this alignment is confirmed through validation or benchmarking exercises, the user gains confidence in the models.

翻译：当通过验证或基准测试确认了这种一致性时，用户就对模型有了信心。

4.this work presents a review of flood loss–or flood vulnerability–relationships collected from the public domain and some professional sources.

翻译：本文对从公共领域和一些专业来源收集的洪水损失（或洪水脆弱性）关系进行了回顾。

5.Flood loss models–or flood vulnerability models–describe the relationship between hazard intensity metrics such as flood depth, velocity, etc. and a damage ratio that can be translated into a monetary quantity. 

翻译：洪水损失模型——或洪水脆弱性模型——描述了洪水深度、速度等灾害强度指标与可转换为货币量的损害率之间的关系。

6.