Integrated Change Control – Sequence of Change Request

本文详细解释了变更请求的概念及其在项目管理中的重要性。通过实例说明了遵循正式变更管理过程的必要性,包括变更请求的记录、影响分析、审批流程及实施步骤。

Most of the times, I receive lots of queries on Sequence of Change Request by several PMP® aspirants preparing for the certification exam.This blog is a step towards addressing queries related to Integrated Change Control – Sequence of Change Request.

Let us begin by answering what is a Change Request?

As per PMBOK® Guide Fifth Edition,

“Change Request is a formal proposal to modify any project document, deliverable or baseline. “

The reasons for a change request can be:

  • Preventive actions – How to prevent potential non-conformities in the project, e.g. training the team members on new technology required in the project. For this training, a change request is required as it may impact the schedule baseline (for the days of training) and cost baseline (for training cost). The proposed training may prevent some amount of rework in the project.
  • Corrective actions – How to correct non-conformities in the project, e.g. Noncompliance points reported post audit which can refine the project’s process. A change request is required to implement these corrective actions in the project as it may change the schedule and scope of the project.
  • Defect repair, e.g. rework which is required to rectify the points identified as defects while inspection will be logged as change request (s)
  • An update request for any change in the project, e.g. change in project scope or some compliance related work needed to be done via following a change control process of the project.

 

Irrespective of the reason, intensity or size of change, a formal change request is required to take forward the change to be a part of the project activities or project baselines.And, how the change request need to documented, managed, monitored and controlled in the project is defined in the Change Management Plan.

Now, we come to our next segment – WHY formal change management process?

It is a common perception that why follow so many formal steps for very small changes in the project, which may not even impact the project baselines or project plans. It is important to understand that the impact of any change shouldn’t be assumed. The formal change control process is required to analyze the impact of change so that the respective planning can be done in advance.

Let’s exemplify it – Ray is the project manager of a website development project. His client sent a scope change for the website and requested Ray to implement the change in the project deliverable which is due after 2 days. As per client,the change is small and can be sent with due deliverable.

Ray and his team conducted a meeting to discuss the change and decided to implement the change without following formal change control process. As they assumed that change is quite small and no need for so many formal steps. They implemented the change on project deliverable without doing even any impact analysis.

The deliverable was not accepted by the customer, as the new scope added was not working as desired.  This failure of new scope added, ended in several defects from the customer.

Ray realized that the defect repair will take 5 days and that he needs to review the schedule baseline and add the new scope in scope baseline as well. The mistake what Ray and his team did was that they just added the scope without doing any impact analysis. Since, impact analysis not done, scope baseline doesn’t contain the information regarding the new scope added recently. The quality control team while doing the inspection of the deliverable missed to inspect the new functionality added since it was not the part of requirements and scope baseline against which they were checking the deliverable. So, here we can see a small change in the scope of the product has cascaded into a large amount of rework afterwards.

If Ray had followed the formal change control process for the scope change received from the customer irrespective of what the client is saying or without any assumption about change, all the impacted documents/ plans/baselines would have been updated. And, at the time of quality control of the deliverable, all the non-compliance with the requirements must have been captured before deliverables sent to the customer for acceptance.

Sequence of Change Request-

pmp-Integrated-Change-Control

  • Whenever a change request is received or suggested or identified, itneeds to be logged in the Change log of the project. Irrespective of the size of the change or the impact of the change, each and every change need to be logged in the change log
  • Project manager alone cannot do the impact analysis, inputs from the project team and if required, from stakeholders are needed. In impact analysis, the impact of the proposed change is analyzed on all project constraints like on scope, schedule, quality, risk, cost or any other project dimension. This is a very important step in integrated change control as impact analysis will be considered as input for the Change request’s approval or rejection.
  • Once the impact analysis done, it is provided to CCB along with change request for the decision of Approval/Postponed/Rejection. In several organizations, authority to take decision on change request lies with Project Manager also, depending on the level/impact of change. And if the impact of change is bigger than that, change request goes to CCB for further decision. A point to remember here – Before Change request is reviewed by the CCB; Impact analysis must have done by the project team as it is the input to CCB for taking decision on change request. OnceCCB takes the decision, it needs to be registered in the change log.
  • If Change request gets approved, the work related to change request becomes part of the project and all related project documents, plans and baselines got updated. For these updates impact analysis is referred to get the information what all need to be reviewed/updated.
  • If Change request gets Rejected or Postponed, the communication is sent torequestor / stakeholder withthe reasons of rejection or postponed.
  • Record of Change request in the change log need to be updated for all details regarding change request like what decision has been taken on it, the reasons for rejection/postponed, and if accepted then what are the follow up steps.

Now, you must have understood what all Integrated Change Control is all about and how it impacts the entire performance of the Project and project team. Thus, not only the presence of change control process is needed in the project, but it has to be followed in the project consistently too. Change control process prevents unnecessary risks to the objective or the success of the project.

【无人机】基于改进粒子群算法的无人机路径规划研究[和遗传算法、粒子群算法进行比较](Matlab代码实现)内容概要:本文围绕基于改进粒子群算法的无人机路径规划展开研究,重点探讨了在复杂环境中利用改进粒子群算法(PSO)实现无人机三维路径规划的方法,并将其与遗传算法(GA)、标准粒子群算法等传统优化算法进行对比分析。研究内容涵盖路径规划的多目标优化、避障策略、航路点约束以及算法收敛性和寻优能力的评估,所有实验均通过Matlab代码实现,提供了完整的仿真验证流程。文章还提到了多种智能优化算法在无人机路径规划中的应用比较,突出了改进PSO在收敛速度和全局寻优方面的优势。; 适合人群:具备一定Matlab编程基础和优化算法知识的研究生、科研人员及从事无人机路径规划、智能优化算法研究的相关技术人员。; 使用场景及目标:①用于无人机在复杂地形或动态环境下的三维路径规划仿真研究;②比较不同智能优化算法(如PSO、GA、蚁群算法、RRT等)在路径规划中的性能差异;③为多目标优化问题提供算法选型和改进思路。; 阅读建议:建议读者结合文中提供的Matlab代码进行实践操作,重点关注算法的参数设置、适应度函数设计及路径约束处理方式,同时可参考文中提到的多种算法对比思路,拓展到其他智能优化算法的研究与改进中。
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值