detach_tasks
在load balance中会将busiest cpu上的task detach掉,然后atach在local cpu上。返回值为detach的task的数量
/*
* detach_tasks() -- tries to detach up to imbalance weighted load from
* busiest_rq, as part of a balancing operation(操作) within domain "sd".
*
* Returns number of detached tasks if successful and 0 otherwise.
*/
// 返回值为detach的task的数量
static int detach_tasks(struct lb_env *env, struct rq_flags *rf)
{
//src_rq是busiest的rq
struct list_head *tasks = &env->src_rq->cfs_tasks;
struct task_struct *p;
unsigned long load;
int detached = 0;
lockdep_assert_held(&env->src_rq->lock);
if (env->imbalance <= 0)
return 0;
/* (7.6.1) 遍历busiest rq中的进程 */
while (!list_empty(tasks)) {
/*
* We don't want to steal all, otherwise we may be treated likewise,
* which could at worst lead to a livelock crash.
*/
/* (7.6.2) 如果dest cpu不是idle,不能将busiest cpu迁移到idle状态 */
if (env->idle != CPU_NOT_IDLE && env->src_rq->nr_running <= 1)
break;
p = list_first_entry(tasks, struct task_struct, se.group_node);
env->loop++;
/* We've more or less seen every task there is, call it quits */
/* (7.6.3) 遍历任务最多不超过sysctl_sched_nr_migrate(32) */
if (env->loop > env->loop_max)
break;
/* take a breather every nr_migrate tasks */
/* (7.6.4) 每sched_nr_migrate_break个任务遍历需要跳出休息一下,
如果没有达到env->loop_max,后面会重来*/
if (env->loop > env->loop_break) {
env->loop_break += sched_nr_migrate_break;
env->flags |= LBF_NEED_BREAK;
break;
}
/* (7.6.5) 判断任务是否支持迁移? */
if (!can_migrate_task(p, env))
goto next;
/* (7.6.6) 获取p进程相对顶层cfs_rq的负载,
根据负载判断进程是否适合迁移*/
load = task_h_load(p);
// LB_MIN 定义的是false
if (sched_feat(LB_MIN) && load < 16 && !env->sd->nr_balance_failed)
goto next;
if ((load / 2) > env->imbalance)
goto next;
// 把task加到env的list里面
detach_task(p, env, rf);
list_add(&p->se.group_node, &env->tasks);
detached++;
env->imbalance -= load;
#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT
/*
* NEWIDLE balancing is a source of latency, so preemptible
* kernels will stop after the first task is detached to minimize
* the critical section.
*/
if (env->idle == CPU_NEWLY_IDLE)
break;
#endif
/*
* We only want to steal up to the prescribed amount of
* weighted load.
*/
if (env->imbalance <= 0)
break;
continue;
next:
// 估计就是下移一位
list_move_tail(&p->se.group_node, tasks);
}
/*
* Right now, this is one of only two places we collect this stat
* so we can safely collect detach_one_task() stats here rather
* than inside detach_one_task().
*/
schedstat_add(env->sd->lb_gained[env->idle], detached);
return detached;
}
task_h_load
因为这里开了CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED宏,所以task的load是相对于csf_rq的load
/*
static inline unsigned long cfs_rq_load_avg(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
{
return cfs_rq->avg.load_avg;
}
*/
static unsigned long task_h_load(struct task_struct *p)
{
struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = task_cfs_rq(p);
update_cfs_rq_h_load(cfs_rq);
//load_avg是带weight的avg load
/* (7.6.6.1) task_h_load的目的是在task_group使能时,rq中有多个层次的cfs_rq
如果进程p挂载在底层的cfs_rq中,把p的负载转换成顶层cfs_rq的相对负载*/
return div64_ul(p->se.avg.load_avg * cfs_rq->h_load,
cfs_rq_load_avg(cfs_rq) + 1);
}
update_cfs_rq_h_load
通过层级关系来计算load值
/*
* Compute the hierarchical load factor for cfs_rq and all its ascendants.
* This needs to be done in a top-down fashion because the load of a child
* group is a fraction of its parents load.
*/
static void update_cfs_rq_h_load(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
{
struct rq *rq = rq_of(cfs_rq);
struct sched_entity *se = cfs_rq->tg->se[cpu_of(rq)];
unsigned long now = jiffies;
unsigned long load;
if (cfs_rq->last_h_load_update == now)
return;
WRITE_ONCE(cfs_rq->h_load_next, NULL);
/* 从底层cfs_rq到顶层cfs_rq建立起层次关系 */
for_each_sched_entity(se) {
cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
WRITE_ONCE(cfs_rq->h_load_next, se);
if (cfs_rq->last_h_load_update == now)
break;
}
if (!se) {
cfs_rq->h_load = cfs_rq_load_avg(cfs_rq);
cfs_rq->last_h_load_update = now;
}
/* 使用建立的关系,从顶层cfs_rq开始计算每个层次cfs_rq的相对顶层负载h_load */
while ((se = READ_ONCE(cfs_rq->h_load_next)) != NULL) {
load = cfs_rq->h_load;
load = div64_ul(load * se->avg.load_avg,
cfs_rq_load_avg(cfs_rq) + 1);
cfs_rq = group_cfs_rq(se);
cfs_rq->h_load = load;
cfs_rq->last_h_load_update = now;
}
}
detach_task
detach的task 一定会attach上,因为在detach_task函数中就已经指定了dst_cpu
/*
* detach_task() -- detach the task for the migration specified(指定的) in env
*/
static void detach_task(struct task_struct *p, struct lb_env *env,
struct rq_flags *rf)
{
lockdep_assert_held(&env->src_rq->lock);
p->on_rq = TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING;
deactivate_task(env->src_rq, p, DEQUEUE_NOCLOCK);
rq_unpin_lock(env->src_rq, rf);
double_lock_balance(env->src_rq, env->dst_rq);
set_task_cpu(p, env->dst_cpu);//这里直接将task的cpu设置为dst_cpu
double_unlock_balance(env->src_rq, env->dst_rq);
rq_repin_lock(env->src_rq, rf);
}
deactive_task函数基本上将task从list上剥离下来。deactivate_task是core.c中定义的函数,后面有空了再去看。
deactivate_task&dequeue_task
void deactivate_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
{
if (task_contributes_to_load(p))
rq->nr_uninterruptible++;
dequeue_task(rq, p, flags);
}
static inline void dequeue_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
{
if (!(flags & DEQUEUE_NOCLOCK))
update_rq_clock(rq);
if (!(flags & DEQUEUE_SAVE)) {
sched_info_dequeued(rq, p);
psi_dequeue(p, flags & DEQUEUE_SLEEP);
}
p->sched_class->dequeue_task(rq, p, flags);
}
dequeue_task_fair
对于普通的内核task,他调用到函数dequeue_task_fair
/*
* The dequeue_task method is called before nr_running is
* decreased. We remove the task from the rbtree and
* update the fair scheduling stats:
*/
/*
1、如果sched_entity的on_rq成员判断进程已经在就绪队列上,则无事可做
2、否则,具体的工作委托给dequeue_entity完成,内核会借机用update_curr更新统计量
dequeue_entity内部会调用__dequeue_entity将进程从红黑树上摘下来
*/
static void dequeue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
{
struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq;
struct sched_entity *se = &p->se;
int task_sleep = flags & DEQUEUE_SLEEP;
/* Update rq's walt util before update schedutil */
walt_dec_cumulative_runnable_avg(rq, p);
/*
* The code below (indirectly) updates schedutil which looks at
* the cfs_rq utilization to select a frequency.
* Let's update schedtune here to ensure the boost value of the
* current task is not more accounted for(考虑) in the selection of the OPP.
*/
schedtune_dequeue_task(p, cpu_of(rq));
for_each_sched_entity(se) {
cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
dequeue_entity(cfs_rq, se, flags);
/*
* end evaluation on encountering(遇到) a throttled cfs_rq
*
* note: in the case of encountering a throttled cfs_rq we will
* post the final h_nr_running decrement below.
*/
if (cfs_rq_throttled(cfs_rq))
break;
cfs_rq->h_nr_running--;
walt_dec_cfs_cumulative_runnable_avg(cfs_rq, p);
/* Don't dequeue parent if it has other entities besides us */
if (cfs_rq->load.weight) {
/* Avoid re-evaluating load for this entity: */
se = parent_entity(se);
/*
* Bias pick_next to pick a task from this cfs_rq, as
* p is sleeping when it is within its sched_slice.
*/
if (task_sleep && se && !throttled_hierarchy(cfs_rq))
set_next_buddy(se);
break;
}
flags |= DEQUEUE_SLEEP;
}
for_each_sched_entity(se) {
cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
cfs_rq->h_nr_running--;
walt_dec_cfs_cumulative_runnable_avg(cfs_rq, p);
if (cfs_rq_throttled(cfs_rq))
break;
update_load_avg(se, UPDATE_TG);
update_cfs_shares(se);
}
if (!se)
sub_nr_running(rq, 1);
util_est_dequeue(&rq->cfs, p, task_sleep);
hrtick_update(rq);
}
walt_dec_cumulative_runnable_avg
void
walt_dec_cumulative_runnable_avg(struct rq *rq,
struct task_struct *p)
{
rq->cumulative_runnable_avg -= p->ravg.demand;
BUG_ON((s64)rq->cumulative_runnable_avg < 0);
/*
* on_rq will be 1 for sleeping tasks. So check if the task
* is migrating or dequeuing in RUNNING state to change the
* prio/cgroup/class.
*/
if (task_on_rq_migrating(p) || p->state == TASK_RUNNING)
fixup_cum_window_demand(rq, -(s64)p->ravg.demand);
}
dequeue_entity
dequeue_entity实际上将task放在红黑树中。同时在dequeue_entity中也会更新entity的load(基于PELT方式计算的load)
static void
dequeue_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se, int flags)
{
/*
* Update run-time statistics of the 'current'.
*/
update_curr(cfs_rq);
/*
* When dequeuing a sched_entity, we must:
* - Update loads to have both entity and cfs_rq synced with now.
* - Substract its load from the cfs_rq->runnable_avg.
* - Substract its previous weight from cfs_rq->load.weight.
* - For group entity, update its weight to reflect the new share
* of its group cfs_rq.
*/
update_load_avg(se, UPDATE_TG);
dequeue_entity_load_avg(cfs_rq, se);
update_stats_dequeue(cfs_rq, se, flags);
clear_buddies(cfs_rq, se);
if (se != cfs_rq->curr)
__dequeue_entity(cfs_rq, se);
se->on_rq = 0;
account_entity_dequeue(cfs_rq, se);
/*
* Normalize after update_curr(); which will also have moved
* min_vruntime if @se is the one holding it back. But before doing
* update_min_vruntime() again, which will discount @se's position and
* can move min_vruntime forward still more.
*/
if (!(flags & DEQUEUE_SLEEP))
se->vruntime -= cfs_rq->min_vruntime;
/* return excess runtime on last dequeue */
return_cfs_rq_runtime(cfs_rq);
update_cfs_shares(se);
/*
* Now advance min_vruntime if @se was the entity holding it back,
* except when: DEQUEUE_SAVE && !DEQUEUE_MOVE, in this case we'll be
* put back on, and if we advance min_vruntime, we'll be placed back
* further than we started -- ie. we'll be penalized.
*/
if ((flags & (DEQUEUE_SAVE | DEQUEUE_MOVE)) != DEQUEUE_SAVE)
update_min_vruntime(cfs_rq);
}
__dequeue_entity
__dequeue_entity函数才是插入红黑树的过程
static void __dequeue_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)
{
//erase抹去
rb_erase_cached(&se->run_node, &cfs_rq->tasks_timeline);
}
462



被折叠的 条评论
为什么被折叠?



