IFB205TC Process ManagementSQL

Java Python 

Module Code and Title

IFB205TC Process Management

School Title

School of Intelligent Finance & Business

Assignment Title

Individual Assessment (100%)

Assessment Tasks:

Analytic Questions (60%)

1.    Compare and  contrast the strategies  and supporting business processes of Spring Airlines and Air China. That is, do some research by yourself and compare their business strategy in terms of the product dimensions, targeted market segments, and their process architectures. (30 marks) (max. 500 words)

2.    Given that your capability of business reception is limited, all customers register through an initial check-in process. Athis or her turn, each customer is seen by a consultant and then exits the process, either with a booking first or with admission to the service directly. Currently, 55 customers per hour arrive at your business, 10 percent of whom are admitted to the service directly. On average, 7 people are waiting to be registered and 34 are registered and waiting to see a consultant. The registration process takes, on average, 2 minutes per customer. Among customers who receive bookings, the average time spent with a consultant is 5 minutes. Among those admitted to the service directly, the average time is 30 minutes.

A triage system has been proposed for the process described above. Under the proposed triage plan, entering customers will be registered as before. They will then be quickly served by an intern who will classify them as normal customers or VIP customers. While normal customers will move on to an area staffed for regular care, VIP customers will betaken to the VIP area. Planners anticipate that the initial classification will take 3 minutes. They expect that, on average, 20 customers will be waiting to register and 5 will be waiting to be seen by the intern. Recall that registration takes an average of 2 minutes per customer. The intern is expected to take an average of 1 minute per customer. Planners expect the regular area to have, on average, 15 customers waiting to be seen. As before, once a customer’s turn comes,&n IFB205TC Process ManagementSQL bsp;each will take 5 minutes of a consultant’s time. The corporation anticipates that, on average, the VIP area will have only 1 customer waiting to be served. As before, once that customer’s turn comes, he or she will take 30 minutes of a consultant’s time. Assume that, as before, 90 percent of all customers are normal customers. Assume, too, that the intern is  100 percent  accurate in making classifications. (Assume the process to be stable; that is, average inflow rate equals average outflow rate.) (30 marks)

a.   Under the proposed plan, how long, on average, will a customer spend in the business process?

b.   On average, how long will a Potential Admit spend in the business process?

c.   On average, how many customers will be in the business process?

Simulation Reflection (40%)

Students are required to write a reflective report based on three iterations of hands-on practices in class, it should be 1000+10% words with references excluded.

Students will compose teams for running the business in class. For each iteration, pay attention to your approach adopted and the process performance, for instance, inventory, number of products assembled, material flow, quality, utilisation of resources, teamwork, and any other worthy of reflection.

The analysis should evolve covering the following iterations:

n Iteration 1: Make-to-Stock (Push) Scenario

n Iteration 2: Make-to-Order (Pull) Scenario

n Iteration 3: Customization Scenario

To conclude, the reflective analysis should base on the simulation of:

    Issues identified in the iterations with relevant optimization approaches

The reflection shall relate to the Topics of Lectures 7 & 9, ensure your discussion meets the requirements.

1.     Submission: Deadline

The penalty will be triggered with the late submission per University Policy.

2.    Format Requirements:

    Maximum 1000 words for each analytic question.

   Assignments must include the cover page with your student ID

   Pls. name the file as IFB205TC-PM-YourID

   All assignments must be typed, proof-read, and professional in appearance; and saved as PDF only.

   The word font should be ‘Times New Roman’ or ‘Calibri Light ’ and font size 12 with 1.5 spacing         

【EI复现】基于主从博弈的新型城镇配电系统产消者竞价策略【IEEE33节点】(Matlab代码实现)内容概要:本文介绍了基于主从博弈理论的新型城镇配电系统中产消者竞价策略的研究,结合IEEE33节点系统,利用Matlab进行仿真代码实现。该研究聚焦于电力市场环境下产消者(既生产又消费电能的主体)之间的博弈行为建模,通过构建主从博弈模型优化竞价策略,提升配电系统运行效率与经济性。文中详细阐述了模型构建思路、优化算法设计及Matlab代码实现过程,旨在复现高水平期刊(EI收录)研究成果,适用于电力系统优化、能源互联网及需求响应等领域。; 适合人群:具备电力系统基础知识和一定Matlab编程能力的研究生、科研人员及从事能源系统优化工作的工程技术人员;尤其适合致力于电力市场博弈、分布式能源调度等方向的研究者。; 使用场景及目标:① 掌握主从博弈在电力系统产消者竞价中的建模方法;② 学习Matlab在电力系统优化仿真中的实际应用技巧;③ 复现EI级别论文成果,支撑学术研究或项目开发;④ 深入理解配电系统中分布式能源参与市场交易的决策机制。; 阅读建议:建议读者结合IEEE33节点标准系统数据,逐步调试Matlab代码,理解博弈模型的变量设置、目标函数构建与求解流程;同时可扩展研究不同市场机制或引入不确定性因素以增强模型实用性。
评论
成就一亿技术人!
拼手气红包6.0元
还能输入1000个字符
 
红包 添加红包
表情包 插入表情
 条评论被折叠 查看
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值