IFB205TC Process ManagementSQL

Java Python 

Module Code and Title

IFB205TC Process Management

School Title

School of Intelligent Finance & Business

Assignment Title

Individual Assessment (100%)

Assessment Tasks:

Analytic Questions (60%)

1.    Compare and  contrast the strategies  and supporting business processes of Spring Airlines and Air China. That is, do some research by yourself and compare their business strategy in terms of the product dimensions, targeted market segments, and their process architectures. (30 marks) (max. 500 words)

2.    Given that your capability of business reception is limited, all customers register through an initial check-in process. Athis or her turn, each customer is seen by a consultant and then exits the process, either with a booking first or with admission to the service directly. Currently, 55 customers per hour arrive at your business, 10 percent of whom are admitted to the service directly. On average, 7 people are waiting to be registered and 34 are registered and waiting to see a consultant. The registration process takes, on average, 2 minutes per customer. Among customers who receive bookings, the average time spent with a consultant is 5 minutes. Among those admitted to the service directly, the average time is 30 minutes.

A triage system has been proposed for the process described above. Under the proposed triage plan, entering customers will be registered as before. They will then be quickly served by an intern who will classify them as normal customers or VIP customers. While normal customers will move on to an area staffed for regular care, VIP customers will betaken to the VIP area. Planners anticipate that the initial classification will take 3 minutes. They expect that, on average, 20 customers will be waiting to register and 5 will be waiting to be seen by the intern. Recall that registration takes an average of 2 minutes per customer. The intern is expected to take an average of 1 minute per customer. Planners expect the regular area to have, on average, 15 customers waiting to be seen. As before, once a customer’s turn comes,&n IFB205TC Process ManagementSQL bsp;each will take 5 minutes of a consultant’s time. The corporation anticipates that, on average, the VIP area will have only 1 customer waiting to be served. As before, once that customer’s turn comes, he or she will take 30 minutes of a consultant’s time. Assume that, as before, 90 percent of all customers are normal customers. Assume, too, that the intern is  100 percent  accurate in making classifications. (Assume the process to be stable; that is, average inflow rate equals average outflow rate.) (30 marks)

a.   Under the proposed plan, how long, on average, will a customer spend in the business process?

b.   On average, how long will a Potential Admit spend in the business process?

c.   On average, how many customers will be in the business process?

Simulation Reflection (40%)

Students are required to write a reflective report based on three iterations of hands-on practices in class, it should be 1000+10% words with references excluded.

Students will compose teams for running the business in class. For each iteration, pay attention to your approach adopted and the process performance, for instance, inventory, number of products assembled, material flow, quality, utilisation of resources, teamwork, and any other worthy of reflection.

The analysis should evolve covering the following iterations:

n Iteration 1: Make-to-Stock (Push) Scenario

n Iteration 2: Make-to-Order (Pull) Scenario

n Iteration 3: Customization Scenario

To conclude, the reflective analysis should base on the simulation of:

    Issues identified in the iterations with relevant optimization approaches

The reflection shall relate to the Topics of Lectures 7 & 9, ensure your discussion meets the requirements.

1.     Submission: Deadline

The penalty will be triggered with the late submission per University Policy.

2.    Format Requirements:

    Maximum 1000 words for each analytic question.

   Assignments must include the cover page with your student ID

   Pls. name the file as IFB205TC-PM-YourID

   All assignments must be typed, proof-read, and professional in appearance; and saved as PDF only.

   The word font should be ‘Times New Roman’ or ‘Calibri Light ’ and font size 12 with 1.5 spacing         

C语言-光伏MPPT算法:电导增量法扰动观察法+自动全局搜索Plecs最大功率跟踪算法仿真内容概要:本文档主要介绍了一种基于C语言实现的光伏最大功率点跟踪(MPPT)算法,结合电导增量法与扰动观察法,并引入自动全局搜索策略,利用Plecs仿真工具对算法进行建模与仿真验证。文档重点阐述了两种经典MPPT算法的原理、优缺点及其在不同光照和温度条件下的动态响应特性,同时提出一种改进的复合控制策略以提升系统在复杂环境下的跟踪精度与稳定性。通过仿真结果对比分析,验证了所提方法在快速性和准确性方面的优势,适用于光伏发电系统的高效能量转换控制。; 适合人群:具备一定C语言编程基础和电力电子知识背景,从事光伏系统开发、嵌入式控制或新能源技术研发的工程师及高校研究人员;工作年限1-3年的初级至中级研发人员尤为适合。; 使用场景及目标:①掌握电导增量法与扰动观察法在实际光伏系统中的实现机制与切换逻辑;②学习如何在Plecs中搭建MPPT控制系统仿真模型;③实现自动全局搜索以避免传统算法陷入局部峰值问题,提升复杂工况下的最大功率追踪效率;④为光伏逆变器或太阳能充电控制器的算法开发提供技术参考与实现范例。; 阅读建议:建议读者结合文中提供的C语言算法逻辑与Plecs仿真模型同步学习,重点关注算法判断条件、步长调节策略及仿真参数设置。在理解基本原理的基础上,可通过修改光照强度、温度变化曲线等外部扰动因素,进一步测试算法鲁棒性,并尝试将其移植到实际嵌入式平台进行实验验证。
评论
成就一亿技术人!
拼手气红包6.0元
还能输入1000个字符
 
红包 添加红包
表情包 插入表情
 条评论被折叠 查看
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值