A-Level经济例题解析及练习Analysis of Tax

本文探讨了不同产品和服务的税收如何影响消费者剩余、生产者剩余及总剩余。通过分析早餐麦片与防晒霜、短期与长期酒店房间以及杂货与高档餐厅用餐的税收,解释了需求弹性的变化如何导致税收带来的福利损失差异。

摘要生成于 C知道 ,由 DeepSeek-R1 满血版支持, 前往体验 >

ca8a082d3843bdaa02f5497e5b65abb2.jpeg

今日知识点:Analysis of Tax

例题

a5beecae24da000db93df51f164c7fb4.jpeg

A. Compute consumer surplus, producer surplus, and total surplus without a tax.

B. If $100 tax per ticket, compute consumer surplus, producer surplus, tax revenue, total surplus, and deadweight loss.


解析

cd98ae62eec6abdc5607ed7c59f74870.jpeg

8085538a70bbee920bf07b64130101b1.jpeg



下面我们为大家准备了一道同类型的题目,请大家一起来试试解答。

Question: Elasticity and the deadweight loss of a tax

Would the deadweight loss of a tax be larger if the tax were on:

A. Breakfast cereal or sunscreen?

B. Hotel rooms in the short run or hotel rooms in the long run?

C. Groceries or meals at fancy restaurants?


.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

正确答案:

A. Breakfast cereal or sunscreen
Breakfast cereal has more close substitutes than sunscreen, so demand for breakfast cereal is more price-elastic than demand for sunscreen.  So, a tax on breakfast cereal would cause a larger deadweight loss than a tax on sunscreen.

B. Hotel rooms in the short run or long run

The price elasticities of demand and supply for hotel rooms are larger in the long run than in the short run. So, a tax on hotel rooms would cause a larger deadweight loss in the long run than in the short run.

C. Groceries or meals at fancy restaurants

Groceries are more of a necessity and therefore less price-elastic than meals at fancy restaurants. So, a tax on restaurant meals would cause a larger deadweight loss than a tax on groceries.

评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值