
今日知识点:
Externality and Government Intervention
例题
Externality and Government Intervention
Acme and US Electric run coal-burning power plants. Each emits 40 tons of sulphur dioxide per month, total emissions = 80 tons/month.
Goal: Reduce SO2 emissions 25%, to 60 tons/month
Cost of reducing emissions: $100/ton for Acme, $200/ton for USE
Policy option 1: Regulation
Every firm must cut its emissions 25% (10 tons).
Compute the cost to each firm and total cost of achieving goal using this policy.
解析
Cost to Acme: (10 tons) x ($100/ton) = $1000
Cost to USE: (10 tons) x ($200/ton) = $2000
Total cost of achieving goal = $3000
下面我们为大家准备了一道同类型的题目,请大家一起来试试解答。
Question: Tradable pollution permits
Initially, Acme and USE each emit 40 tons SO2/month.
Goal: reduce SO2 emissions to 60 tons/month total.
Policy option 2: Tradable pollution permits
Issue 60 permits, each allows one ton SO2 emissions. Give 30 permits to each firm. Establish market for trading permits.
Each firm may use all its permits to emit 30 tons, may emit < 30 tons and sell leftover permits, or may purchase extra permits to emit > 30 tons.
Compute cost of achieving goal if Acme uses 20 permits and sells 10 to USE for $150 each.
.
.
.
.
.
正确答案及解析:
Acme
· sells 10 permits to USE for $150 each, gets $1500
· uses 20 permits, emits 20 tons SO2
· spends $2000 to reduce emissions by 20 tons
· net cost to Acme: $2000 - $1500 = $500
USE
· buys 10 permits from Acme, spends $1500
· uses these 10 plus original 30 permits, emits 40 tons
· spends nothing on abatement
· net cost to USE = $1500
Total cost of achieving goal = $500 + $1500 = $2000
Using tradable permits, goal is achieved at lower total cost and lower cost to each firm than using regulation.
本文探讨了环境外部性和政府干预的主题,通过Acme和US Electric两个公司的案例,分析了两种减排策略的成本。第一种是直接监管,要求每个公司减少25%的硫排放,总成本为$3000。第二种策略是可交易的污染许可证,通过市场交易,Acme和USE以总成本$2000实现了相同的目标,比监管政策更具成本效益。
760

被折叠的 条评论
为什么被折叠?



