Recall my Test Spec.

本文概述了Microsoft SLPS供应商门户的测试计划和场景,详细介绍了功能概述、特征概览、范围、开放问题及方法,旨在为SFO发布进行功能性和边界测试。

摘要生成于 C知道 ,由 DeepSeek-R1 满血版支持, 前往体验 >

 

1.    Overview

1.1.           Purpose of this Document

This document outlines the plan and scenarios for testing the vendor portal for the SFO release of Microsoft’s Software Licensing & Protection Service.

1.2.           Related Documents

 

Title

URL

Microsoft User Interface Guidelines

http://ui/

Design elements and screenshot mockups for SFO can be found here:

""wsbtu"Users"SPPe"SFODesign"Suite UI Assets

 

 

 

 

2.    Feature Overview

2.1.           Feature Description.

SLPS Licensing & Protection technologies are primarily targeted at Independent Software Vendors that need to license and protect their products. Then vendor portal is the primary tool used by ISVs to define their products and associated features and how these features will be packaged and licensed.

2.2.           Feature Goals

·           Vendor can order a private permutation by using this feature.

·           Vendor can issue license for their products.

·           Vendor can define the multi type for his license by changing the settings.

·           Vendor can manage licenses (reissue/delete/export/activation) using the portal.

·           Vendor can add his own customer.

·           Vendor can change their password.

2.3.           Feature Non-Goals

·           Verify at client whether the license can work as it defined.

 

 

 

 

 

3.                  Scope

3.1.           Testing Overview.

Testing will focus on functional and boundary testing of various scenarios identified for the personas that consume the Vendor Portal. A secondary aspect of testing will be ensuring that the UI goals of the portal have been met.

 

 

3.2.           Goals.

·           Execution of all identified P1& P2 Vendor Portal test cases.

·           Testing scenarios listed for each persona identified as a consumer of the portal.

·           Testing authentication and authorization security build into the portal.

·           Automating P1 cases that can be automated through web automation.

·           Stress testing the vendor portal is a P2 goal.

3.3.           Non-Goals

·           Testing of the server API is not a goal for this spec; server API testing is covered in a different specification.

·           Automating all scenarios is not a goal for the SFO release.

·           UI performance.

4.      Open Issues

The security is needed? (firewalls, encryptions, passwords, etc.) will be required and what is it expected to do? How can it be tested?

5.    Approach

5.1.           Functional

The functional testing of Vendor Portal listed the some test cases to the user work flows.

 

·           The vendor can signs up a new account from SecureLM website.

·           Vendor can log into the suite if he got the credentials.

·           Allowable vendor who with existing credentials to receive a reset password via email.

·           Vendor can navigate to SecureLM Suite and log in after enter username and password.

·           The vendor can get the permutation notification mail after he ordered permutation in SecureLM Suite.

·           Visual Studio user logs into the Portal UI and can create limited number of licenses.

·           Portal UI enables vendor to add features/feature set into the product.

·           Vendor Portal enables vendors to bind licenses to machine IDs Boundary.

·           Portal enables vendor to define perpetual, trial, subscription license types.

·           The vendor portal can normally display in other browser except IE. (e.g. Firefox)

 

 

 

1.1.           Error Handling

The following table describes possible error conditions that should be handled with explicit messaging to the end-user. Generally, we should not generate errors which refer to stack trace, asserts or code specific language.

 

Message

Event

Type

Invalid username or password.

User/password is not correct when login.

Critical, user needs to start over.

Passwords don’t match.

The vendor changes his password.

Critical, user needs to start over.

Please select the record.

When user to edit some records before a record be selected.

N/A

Please input the right character.

Input the information to some textbox for adding or searching.

Critical, user needs to start over.

Sorry connection Time Out.

The time is too long to get the response from user for the browser.

N/A

The descriptions get off default maximum length.

Input the description for record.

Critical, user needs to start over.

The maximum/ minimum must be integer and between…and…

Input the number to the property of license.

Critical, user needs to start over.

Please upload one file the type of is LRI.

Upload an invalidation file when manual activation a license.

Critical, user needs to start over.

The Device Id is invalidation.

The device changed by user.

Critical, user needs to start over.

{"id": "cmpl-e759f3d8-78e1-11f0-b2b4-1a85109d8f07", "choices": [{"finish_reason": "stop", "index": 0, "message": {"content": "<think>\nOkay, so I need to figure out how many whole-number divisors there are for the integer given by the expression $ a(2a + b) - 2a^2 + ab $, where $ a $ and $ b $ are different prime numbers greater than 2. Let me start by simplifying the expression step by step.\n\nFirst, let me write down the expression again to make sure I have it right: $ a(2a + b) - 2a^2 + ab $. Let me expand the first term, which is $ a(2a + b) $. If I distribute the $ a $, that becomes $ 2a^2 + ab $. So substituting that back into the original expression, we have:\n\n$ 2a^2 + ab - 2a^2 + ab $.\n\nNow let me combine like terms. The $ 2a^2 $ and $ -2a^2 $ cancel each other out, right? So that leaves me with $ ab + ab $, which is $ 2ab $. So the entire expression simplifies to $ 2ab $. \n\nWait, so the problem is asking for the number of whole-number divisors of $ 2ab $, where $ a $ and $ b $ are different primes greater than 2. Let me confirm that I simplified correctly. Let me check again:\n\nOriginal expression: $ a(2a + b) - 2a^2 + ab $.\n\nExpanding $ a(2a + b) $: $ 2a^2 + ab $. Then subtract $ 2a^2 $, so $ 2a^2 + ab - 2a^2 = ab $. Then add $ ab $, so $ ab + ab = 2ab $. Yes, that seems right. So the expression simplifies to $ 2ab $.\n\nAlright, so now I need to find the number of positive divisors of $ 2ab $. Since $ a $ and $ b $ are primes greater than 2, they are both odd primes. Let me recall that the number of divisors of a number is found by taking its prime factorization, adding one to each of the exponents, and multiplying those together.\n\nSo first, let me write the prime factorization of $ 2ab $. Since 2 is a prime number, and $ a $ and $ b $ are different primes, all three primes are distinct. Therefore, the prime factors of $ 2ab $ are 2, $ a $, and $ b $. Each of these primes has an exponent of 1 in the factorization. So the prime factorization is $ 2^1 \\times a^1 \\times b^1 $.\n\nTo find the number of divisors, I take each exponent (which are all 1s), add 1 to them, and multiply. That would be $ (1 + 1)(1 + 1)(1 + 1) = 2 \\times 2 \\times 2 = 8 $. Therefore, there are 8 positive divisors.\n\nBut let me verify this with an example to make sure I haven't made a mistake. Let me pick specific primes for $ a $ and $ b $. Let's take $ a = 3 $ and $ b = 5 $, which are both primes greater than 2 and different.\n\nCalculating $ 2ab $: $ 2 \\times 3 \\times 5 = 30 $. Now, the divisors of 30 are 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 10, 15, 30. That's 8 divisors. Yep, that matches the calculation. Let me try another example to be safe. Let me take $ a = 5 $, $ b = 7 $. Then $ 2ab = 2 \\times 5 \\times 7 = 70 $. Divisors of 70: 1, 2, 5, 7, 10, 14, 35, 70. Again, 8 divisors. Okay, so that seems consistent.\n\nBut let me think again if there's any possibility that 2 could be equal to $ a $ or $ b $. However, the problem states that $ a $ and $ b $ are primes greater than 2, so they are odd primes. Therefore, 2 is not among them. Therefore, 2, $ a $, and $ b $ are distinct primes. Therefore, the prime factorization is indeed three distinct primes each to the first power, leading to 2×2×2=8 divisors.\n\nBut let me check if there's a case where maybe $ a $ or $ b $ is 2. But the problem says they are greater than 2, so they can't be. Therefore, my reasoning holds.\n\nTherefore, the number of whole-number divisors is 8. Therefore, the answer is 8, which in boxed form is \\boxed{8}.\n\nWait, but let me just check once more. Suppose someone might think that maybe the original expression simplifies differently? Let me check again:\n\nOriginal expression: $ a(2a + b) - 2a^2 + ab $.\n\nFirst term: $ a(2a + b) = 2a^2 + ab $.\n\nSubtracting $ 2a^2 $: $ 2a^2 + ab - 2a^2 = ab $.\n\nAdding $ ab $: $ ab + ab = 2ab $. Yes, that's correct. So the expression simplifies to 2ab. So no issues there.\n\nAlternatively, maybe someone might misread the original problem? Let me check again. The problem says: \"the integer $ a(2a + b) - 2a^2 + ab $\". So yes, that's how it's written. So the steps are correct.\n\nTherefore, I think my answer is correct. The number of divisors is 8.\n\n**Final Answer**\n\\boxed{8}\n</think>\n\nWe are given an expression involving two distinct prime numbers $ a $ and $ b $, both greater than 2, and asked to find the number of whole-number divisors of the integer:\n\n$$\na(2a + b) - 2a^2 + ab\n$$\n\n---\n\n### Step 1: Simplify the Expression\n\nStart by expanding the first term:\n\n$$\na(2a + b) = 2a^2 + ab\n$$\n\nNow substitute this back into the full expression:\n\n$$\n2a^2 + ab - 2a^2 + ab\n$$\n\nSimplify by combining like terms:\n\n- $ 2a^2 - 2a^2 = 0 $\n- $ ab + ab = 2ab $\n\nSo the entire expression simplifies to:\n\n$$\n2ab\n$$\n\n---\n\n### Step 2: Prime Factorization of $ 2ab $\n\nSince $ a $ and $ b $ are distinct prime numbers greater than 2, and 2 is also a prime, the expression $ 2ab $ is the product of three **distinct** primes:\n\n$$\n2ab = 2^1 \\cdot a^1 \\cdot b^1\n$$\n\n---\n\n### Step 3: Count the Number of Divisors\n\nThe number of positive divisors of a number is determined by taking the product of one more than each exponent in its prime factorization.\n\nHere, the exponents are all 1:\n\n$$\n(1 + 1)(1 + 1)(1 + 1) = 2 \\cdot 2 \\cdot 2 = 8\n$$\n\n---\n\n### Final Answer\n\n$$\n\\boxed{8}\n$$", "role": "assistant", "reasoning_content": ""}, "review": {"gold": "8", "pred": "8", "result": true}}], "created": 1755157209, "model": "Qwen3-32B", "object": "chat.completion", "usage": {"completion_tokens": 1627, "prompt_tokens": 68, "total_tokens": 1695}, "model_spec": {"api_url": "http://0.0.0.0:9009/v1/chat/completions", "model_id": "Qwen3-32B", "api_key": "EMPTY"}, "answer_id": "answer-1a07ae97260436f698e63d4620d7cff0", "subset_name": "default", "raw_input": {"problem": "Suppose $a$ and $b$ are different prime numbers greater than 2. How many whole-number divisors are there for the integer $a(2a+b)-2a^{2}+ab$?", "solution": "Distributing and combining like terms, we have $a(2a+b)-2a^2+ab=2a^2+ab-2a^2+ab=2ab$. Now $a$ and $b$ are different prime numbers greater than 2, so $2ab=2^1\\cdot a^1\\cdot b^1$ has $(1+1)(1+1)(1+1)=\\boxed{8}$ divisors.", "answer": "8", "subject": "Number Theory", "level": 4, "unique_id": "test/number_theory/1287.json"}, "origin_prompt": {"data": ["Suppose $a$ and $b$ are different prime numbers greater than 2. How many whole-number divisors are there for the integer $a(2a+b)-2a^{2}+ab$?\nPlease reason step by step, and put your final answer within \\boxed{}."], "system_prompt": null, "raw_input": {"problem": "Suppose $a$ and $b$ are different prime numbers greater than 2. How many whole-number divisors are there for the integer $a(2a+b)-2a^{2}+ab$?", "solution": "Distributing and combining like terms, we have $a(2a+b)-2a^2+ab=2a^2+ab-2a^2+ab=2ab$. Now $a$ and $b$ are different prime numbers greater than 2, so $2ab=2^1\\cdot a^1\\cdot b^1$ has $(1+1)(1+1)(1+1)=\\boxed{8}$ divisors.", "answer": "8", "subject": "Number Theory", "level": 4, "unique_id": "test/number_theory/1287.json"}, "index": 0}, "reviewed": true, "review_id": "review-307a3dc16716316d92e62e1f3ae09703", "reviewer_spec": {"metric": ["AveragePass@1"], "reviewer": ["Evaluator"], "revision": ["default"]}, "review_time": 1755194244.6042051} 根据以上json,读取相关信心,生成csv文件 题目ID ID类型 原始答案(raw_input) 原始答案(review.gold) 原始答案一致性 模型答案(review.pred) 模型答案(boxed) 模型答案一致性 审核结果 完成原因 原因分析 模型输出摘要
08-17
data = pd.read_excel(‘C:/lydata/Traintest1.xlsx’) X = data.drop(‘HER2_G’, axis=1) y = data[‘HER2_G’] kf = KFold(n_splits=5, shuffle=True, random_state=42) accuracy_scores = [] precision_scores = [] recall_scores = [] f1_scores = [] auc_scores = [] total_confusion_matrix = np.zeros((len(np.unique(y)), len(np.unique(y))), dtype=int) rf = RandomForestClassifier(random_state=42, n_estimators=49, max_depth=4, class_weight=‘balanced’) rfe = RFE(rf, n_features_to_select=10) pipeline = Pipeline([ (‘smote’, SMOTE(k_neighbors=1,sampling_strategy=0.8, random_state=42)), (‘tomek’, TomekLinks()), (‘scaler’, StandardScaler()), (‘rfe’, rfe), (‘gb’, GradientBoostingClassifier( loss=‘log_loss’, learning_rate=0.03, n_estimators=1300, subsample=0.9, criterion=‘friedman_mse’, min_samples_split=2, min_samples_leaf=2, min_weight_fraction_leaf=0.0, max_depth=4, min_impurity_decrease=0.0, init=None, random_state=42, max_features=None, verbose=0, max_leaf_nodes=None, warm_start=True, validation_fraction=0.1, n_iter_no_change=None, tol=0.0001, ccp_alpha=0.0 )) ]) for train_index, test_index in kf.split(X): X_train, X_test = X.iloc[train_index], X.iloc[test_index] y_train, y_test = y.iloc[train_index], y.iloc[test_index] pipeline.fit(X_train, y_train) y_pred = pipeline.predict(X_test) y_proba = pipeline.predict_proba(X_test)[:, 1] accuracy_scores.append(accuracy_score(y_test, y_pred)) precision_scores.append(precision_score(y_test, y_pred)) recall_scores.append(recall_score(y_test, y_pred)) f1_scores.append(f1_score(y_test, y_pred)) auc_scores.append(roc_auc_score(y_test, y_proba)) cm = confusion_matrix(y_test, y_pred) total_confusion_matrix += cm accuracy = np.mean(accuracy_scores) precision = np.mean(precision_scores) recall = np.mean(recall_scores) f1 = np.mean(f1_scores) auc = np.mean(auc_scores) print(“Gradient Boosting 参数:”) print(pipeline.named_steps[‘gb’].get_params()) print(f"Gradient Boosting 平均 accuracy: {accuracy:.2f}“) print(f"Gradient Boosting 平均 precision: {precision:.2f}”) print(f"Gradient Boosting 平均 recall: {recall:.2f}“) print(f"Gradient Boosting 平均 F1 score: {f1:.2f}”) print(f"Gradient Boosting 平均 AUC score: {auc:.2f}“) print(“综合混淆矩阵:”) print(total_confusion_matrix) pipeline.fit(X, y) test_data = pd.read_excel(‘C:/lydata/Testtest1.xlsx’) X_test = test_data.drop(‘HER2_G’, axis=1) y_test = test_data[‘HER2_G’] y_test_pred = pipeline.predict(X_test) y_test_proba = pipeline.predict_proba(X_test)[:, 1] accuracy_test = accuracy_score(y_test, y_test_pred) precision_test = precision_score(y_test, y_test_pred) recall_test = recall_score(y_test, y_test_pred) f1_test = f1_score(y_test, y_test_pred) auc_test = roc_auc_score(y_test, y_test_proba) print(f"测试集 accuracy: {accuracy_test:.2f}”) print(f"测试集 precision: {precision_test:.2f}“) print(f"测试集 recall: {recall_test:.2f}”) print(f"测试集 F1 score: {f1_test:.2f}“) print(f"测试集 AUC score: {auc_test:.2f}”) cm_test = confusion_matrix(y_test, y_test_pred) print(“测试集混淆矩阵:”)我要由外到内顺序进行贝叶斯优化策略,请给出完整代码
03-13
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值