Linux高性能服务器编程阅读日记——epoll两种触发模式比较
eopll,LT水平触发和ET边缘触发的区别,写了个简单的服务器代码测试了一下
#include<sys/types.h>
#include<sys/epoll.h>
#include<sys/socket.h>
#include<netinet/in.h>
#include<arpa/inet.h>
#include<assert.h>
#include<stdio.h>
#include<errno.h>
#include<unistd.h>
#include<fcntl.h>
#include<string.h>
#include<stdlib.h>
#include<pthread.h>
#define MAX_EVENT_NUMBER 1024
#define BUFFER_SIZE 10
//将文件描述符设置成非阻塞的
int setnonblocking(int fd)
{
int old_option = fcntl(fd, F_GETFL);
int new_option = old_option | O_NONBLOCK;
fcntl(fd,F_SETFL,new_option);
return old_option;
}
void addfd(int epollfd,int fd,bool enable_et)
{
epoll_event event;
event.data.fd = fd;
event.events = EPOLLIN;
if(enable_et)
event.events |= EPOLLET;
epoll_ctl(epollfd,EPOLL_CTL_ADD,fd,&event);
setnonblocking(fd);
}
void lt(epoll_event* events,int number,int epollfd,int listenfd)
{
char buf[BUFFER_SIZE];
for(int i=0;i<number;i++)
{
int sockfd = events[i].data.fd;
if(sockfd ==listenfd)
{
struct sockaddr_in client_address;
socklen_t client_addrlength = sizeof(client_address);
int connfd = accept(listenfd,
(struct sockaddr*)&client_address,
&client_addrlength);
addfd(epollfd,connfd,false);//对connfd禁用ET模式
}
else if(events[i].events&EPOLLIN)
{
//只要socket读缓存中还有未读出的数据,这段代码就被触发
printf("event trigger once\n");
memset(buf,'\0',BUFFER_SIZE);
int ret = recv(sockfd,buf,BUFFER_SIZE-1,0);
if(ret<=0)
{
close(sockfd);
continue;
}
printf("get %d bytes of content:%s\n",ret,buf);
}
else
printf("something else happened\n");
}
}
void et(epoll_event* events,int number,int epollfd,int listenfd)
{
char buf[BUFFER_SIZE];
for(int i=0;i<number;i++)
{
int sockfd = events[i].data.fd;
if(sockfd ==listenfd)
{
struct sockaddr_in client_address;
socklen_t client_addrlength = sizeof(client_address);
int connfd = accept(listenfd,(struct sockaddr*)&client_address,&client_addrlength);
addfd(epollfd,connfd,false);//对connfd禁用ET模式
}
else if(events[i].events&EPOLLIN)
{
//只要socket读缓存中还有未读出的数据,这段代码就被触发
printf("event trigger once\n");
while(1)
{
memset(buf,'\0',BUFFER_SIZE);
int ret = recv(sockfd,buf,BUFFER_SIZE-1,0);
if(ret<0)
{
if((errno==EAGAIN)||(errno==EWOULDBLOCK))
{
printf("read later\n");
break;
}
close(sockfd);
break;
}
else if(ret==0)
close(sockfd);
else
printf("get %d bytes of content:%s\n",ret,buf);
}
}
else
printf("something else happened\n");
}
}
int main(int argc,char* argv[])
{
const char* ip =argv[1];
int port = atoi(argv[2]);
int ret = 0;
struct sockaddr_in address;
bzero(&address,sizeof(address));
address.sin_family = AF_INET;
inet_pton(AF_INET,ip,&address.sin_addr);
address.sin_port = htons(port);
int listenfd = socket(PF_INET,SOCK_STREAM,0);
assert(listenfd >= 0);
ret = bind(listenfd,(struct sockaddr*)&address,sizeof(address));
assert(ret!=-1);
ret = listen(listenfd,5);
assert(ret!=-1);
epoll_event events[MAX_EVENT_NUMBER];
int epollfd = epoll_create(5);
assert(epollfd!=-1);
addfd(epollfd,listenfd,true);
while(1)
{
int ret = epoll_wait(epollfd,events,MAX_EVENT_NUMBER,-1);
if(ret<0)
{
printf("epoll fail");
break;
}
et(events,ret,epollfd,listenfd);
}
}
telnet模拟http请求发送给服务端可以发现,发送超过十个字符的请求的时候两种模式的处理方式不同,LT模式未读取完成则还可以继续触发epoll事件,ET模式必须每次有IO请求就循环读取结束为止,否则下次不会再触发epoll事件。
看起来是LT模式比较智能,但是实际上,ET模式效率比较高,因为读取IO请求只需要触发一次。