Interface in Go

本文深入探讨了Go语言中的接口实现方式,包括接口值的两词对结构、接口表(itable)的动态计算以及内存优化。Go在方法调用上介于静态与动态之间,它在运行时计算itable,缓存以提高效率。同时,文章还讨论了方法查找性能方面的考虑。

Source:
(1)Go Data Structures: Interfaces
(2)Go Interfaces
Digest:

1. Interface Values:

Languages with methods typically fall into one of two camps: prepare tables for all the method calls statically (as in C++ and Java), or do a method lookup at each call (as in Smalltalk and its many imitators, JavaScript and Python included) and add fancy caching to make that call efficient. Go sits halfway between the two: it has method tables but computes them at run time. ...

Interface values are represented as a two-word pair giving a pointer to information about the type stored in the interface and a pointer to the associated data. ...

The first word in the interface value points at what i call an interface table or itable (pronounced i-table; in the runtime sources, the C implementation name is Itab). The itables begins with some metadata about the types involved and then becomes a list of function pointers. Note that the itable corresponds to the interface type, not the dynamic type. ...

The second word in the interface value points at the actual data. In this case a copy of b. The assignment "var s Stringer = b" makes a copy of b rather than point at b for the same reason that "var c uint64 = b" makes a copy: if b later changes, s and c are supposed to have the original value, not the new one. Values stored in interfaces might be arbitrarily large, but only one word is dedicated to holding the value in the interface structure, so assignment allocates a chunk of memory on the heap and records the pointer in the one-word slot. (There's an obvious optimization when the value does fit in the slot; we'll get to that later.)

...

2. Computing the Itable:

Now we know what the itables look like, but where do they come from? Go's dynamic type conversions mean that it isn't reasonable for the compiler or linker to precompute all possible itables: there are too many (interface type, concrete type) pairs, and most won't be needed. Instead, the compiler generates a type description structure for each concrete type like "Binary" or "int" or "func(map[int]string)". Among other metadata, the type description structure contains a list of the methods implemented by that type. Similarly, the compiler generates a (different) type description structure for each interface type like "Stringer"; it too contains a method list. The interface runtime computes the itable by looking for each method listed in the interface type's method table in the concrete type's method table. The runtime caches the itable after generating it, so that this correspondence need only be computed once.

...

3. Memory Optimizations:

...

4. Method Lookup Performance:

...

内容概要:本文介绍了一个基于MATLAB实现的无人机三维路径规划项目,采用蚁群算法(ACO)与多层感知机(MLP)相结合的混合模型(ACO-MLP)。该模型通过三维环境离散化建模,利用ACO进行全局路径搜索,并引入MLP对环境特征进行自适应学习与启发因子优化,实现路径的动态调整与多目标优化。项目解决了高维空间建模、动态障碍规避、局部最优陷阱、算法实时性及多目标权衡等关键技术难题,结合并行计算与参数自适应机制,提升了路径规划的智能性、安全性和工程适用性。文中提供了详细的模型架构、核心算法流程及MATLAB代码示例,涵盖空间建模、信息素更新、MLP训练与融合优化等关键步骤。; 适合人群:具备一定MATLAB编程基础,熟悉智能优化算法与神经网络的高校学生、科研人员及从事无人机路径规划相关工作的工程师;适合从事智能无人系统、自动驾驶、机器人导航等领域的研究人员; 使用场景及目标:①应用于复杂三维环境下的无人机路径规划,如城市物流、灾害救援、军事侦察等场景;②实现飞行安全、能耗优化、路径平滑与实时避障等多目标协同优化;③为智能无人系统的自主决策与环境适应能力提供算法支持; 阅读建议:此资源结合理论模型与MATLAB实践,建议读者在理解ACO与MLP基本原理的基础上,结合代码示例进行仿真调试,重点关注ACO-MLP融合机制、多目标优化函数设计及参数自适应策略的实现,以深入掌握混合智能算法在工程中的应用方法。
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值