ArrayList与LinkedList的性能对比

最新推荐文章于 2023-08-26 13:31:05 发布

weixin_34365635

最新推荐文章于 2023-08-26 13:31:05 发布

阅读量177

点赞数

CC 4.0 BY-SA版权

文章标签：移动开发

原文链接：http://blog.51cto.com/11219183/2401486

博客介绍了ArrayList与LinkedList都继承自Collection对象，因内部实现不同在性能上有差异。进行了插入和查询性能对比，指出LinkedList优势在于头部插入而非随机插入，使用时需按需选择。

摘要生成于 C知道，由 DeepSeek-R1 满血版支持，前往体验 >

ArrayList与LinkedList都是继承至Collection对象,内部实现导致性能方面存在一定的区别

插入性能对比

private final static int COUNT = 10000000;

private static long insertObject(List<Object> list) {
    Object obj = new Object();
    long startTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
    for (int i = 0; i < COUNT; i++) {
        list.add(obj);
    }
    long endTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
    return endTime - startTime;
}

public static void main(String[] args) {
    int initCount = (int) (COUNT * 1.5);
    System.out.println("ArrayList 增加" + COUNT + "条数据,耗时:" + insertObject(new ArrayList<Object>(initCount)));
    System.out.println("LinkedList 增加" + COUNT + "条数据,耗时:" + insertObject(new LinkedList<Object>()));
}

上述代码得出下列结果:
ArrayList与LinkedList的性能对比

查询性能对比

    private final static int COUNT = 1000000;

    private static Map<String, Object> insertObject(List<Object> list) {
        User user = new User();
        long startTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
        for (int i = 0; i < COUNT; i++) {
            user.setId(i);
            user.setName("i:" + i);
            user.setAge(i);
            list.add(user);
        }
        long endTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
        Map result = new HashMap<String, Object>();
        result.put("time", endTime - startTime);
        result.put("list", list);
        return result;
    }

    private static long readObject(List<User> list) {
        long startTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
        for (User user : list) {

        }
        long endTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
        return endTime - startTime;
    }

    public static void main(String[] args) {
        // 插入
        int initCount = (int) (COUNT * 1.5);
        Map<String, Object> arrayListResult = insertObject(new ArrayList<Object>());
        Map<String, Object> linkedListResult = insertObject(new LinkedList<Object>());
        System.out.println("ArrayList 增加" + COUNT + "条数据,耗时:" + arrayListResult.get("time"));
        System.out.println("LinkedList 增加" + COUNT + "条数据,耗时:" + linkedListResult.get("time"));

        // 读取
        System.out.println("ArrayList 查询" + COUNT + "条数据,耗时:" + readObject((List<User>) arrayListResult.get("list")));
        System.out.println("LinkedList 查询" + COUNT + "条数据,耗时:" + readObject((List<User>) linkedListResult.get("list")));
    }

结果如下所示:
ArrayList与LinkedList的性能对比

3.LinkedList的优势


    static final int N = 500000;

    static long timeList(List<Object> list) {
        long start = System.currentTimeMillis();
        Object o = new Object();
        for (int i = 0; i < N; i++) {
            list.add(0, o);
        }
        long endTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
        return endTime - start;
    }

    static long readList(List list) {
        long start = System.currentTimeMillis();
        for (int i = 0, j = list.size(); i < j; i++) {

        }
        return System.currentTimeMillis() - start;
    }

    static List addList(List list) {
        Object o = new Object();
        for (int i = 0; i < N; i++) {
            list.add(0, o);
        }
        return list;
    }

    public static void main(String[] args) {
        System.out.println("ArrayList添加" + N + "条耗时：" + timeList(new ArrayList<Object>()));
        System.out.println("LinkedList添加" + N + "条耗时：" + timeList(new LinkedList<Object>()));

        List list1 = addList(new ArrayList<>());
        List list2 = addList(new LinkedList<>());
        System.out.println("ArrayList查找" + N + "条耗时：" + readList(list1));
        System.out.println("LinkedList查找" + N + "条耗时：" + readList(list2));
    }

结果:
ArrayList与LinkedList的性能对比