转自博客 http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_4d25466d0101p47z.html
===============================================================================
Greenhouse-Geisser 一般在ANOVA的统计分析常用,在结果报告中我很困惑其df的报告。今天特意把这个问题弄个明白:
自由度是否报告校正后的,让我很困恼,有网友说:即便校正也不需要报告校正后自由度,只报告原来非校正的。或者看看文献里如何报告的。有位发表过脑电文章的在国内科研单位工作的网友说:是必须报告校正后的,也一般报告四舍五入的整数值即可。
如下是源自:https://statistics.laerd.com/statistical-guides/sphericity-statistical-guide-2.php
This is to counteract the fact that when the assumption of sphericity is violated, there is an increase in Type I errors due to the critical values in the F-table being too small. These corrections attempt to correct this bias.---校正的目的
epsilon (referred to as
)具体是指: 如下的红线框旁边的(p大于0.05,所以这个是没有违反球形检验):
当ε = 1时,说明这个值就是满足球形检验;但是当这个值越是小于1时,则越不满足违反了球形检验。
Greenhouse-Geisser 一般在ANOVA的统计分析常用,在结果报告中我很困惑其df的报告。今天特意把这个问题弄个明白:
自由度是否报告校正后的,让我很困恼,有网友说:即便校正也不需要报告校正后自由度,只报告原来非校正的。或者看看文献里如何报告的。有位发表过脑电文章的在国内科研单位工作的网友说:是必须报告校正后的,也一般报告四舍五入的整数值即可。
如下是源自:https://statistics.laerd.com/statistical-guides/sphericity-statistical-guide-2.php
This is to counteract the fact that when the assumption of sphericity is violated, there is an increase in Type I errors due to the critical values in the F-table being too small. These corrections attempt to correct this bias.---校正的目的
epsilon (referred to as

当ε = 1时,说明这个值就是满足球形检验;但是当这个值越是小于1时,则越不满足违反了球形检验。
Greenhouse-Geisser Correction
Greenhouse-Geisser Correction为了校正F-分布的自由度进行估计epsilon;比如在违反了球形检验,就可以使用该检验。自由度也要相应的变化:The Greenhouse-Geisser procedure estimates epsilon (referred to as ) in order to correct the degrees of freedom of the F-distribution as has been mentioned previously, and shown below: