subpage和secondary page的区别

Hi,  Can you tell me the differences between subpage and secondary  page and when to use which ? I need to display about 100 fields  of our custom interface record on 4 different pages or tabs (I  want the look just like the page with 3 tabs of "Workforce Admin  > Personal Info > Biographical > Modify a person"). But I am not  sure which page type (subpage or secondary page) would be the  best to use.  Note: all the fields is coming from the same record. 
Thanks in advance for any suggestions, 
BT
 
 

Popular White Paper On This Topic

 
 
2 Replies
 
 
  
0
 
Sidharth Ghai replied May 4, 2007
 
Brian  Sub and secondary have totally different contexts. A sub page is  utilized where you wanna display/ capture similar information  for various entities, for example, capturing an address, for a  company or for a person, would need similar information like  street address, state county, country etc.. In those situations  a sub page would be used, to design once and reuse at multiple  places. 
A Secondary page is used to display/ capture secondary  information about an entity. A secondary page could use various  sub pages, but the reverse is not true. 
For your case, I don't see any usage of either of the pages as  you said its a custom component used to display multiple fields  information on several pages, I would go for a subpage having  key information displayed on the top of each page and then show  relevant information on subsequent pages. 
Hope this helps!!
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
0
 
sg replied May 4, 2007
 
Modify Person is built using multiple "normal" pages (not sub or  secondary pages). 
Sub page is generally used for reuse; i.e. you have the same 4 fields  appearing the same way on several different pages. Then you'd use a  subpage with those fields and include the subpage in all those pages. 
Secondary page is used mostly as a pop-up type page to show additional  information or to collect additional information. 
For your requirement, I'd simply use a component with multiple pages  (just like the Modify Person). 
One alternative is to make use a grid (if you are going to show data in  a grid) and you can use tab separators to show multiple tabs within the  grid (don't know what tools you are on but in later tools this is an  option).

转载于:https://www.cnblogs.com/bryanchen/p/3385892.html

### 技术差异对比 #### 芯片概述 U1253B U1273A 是两款可能属于同一类别但具有不同特性用途的芯片。虽然具体的官方文档未被提供,但从命名规律来看,这两款芯片可能是某种存储器或通信设备中的核心组件[^1]。 #### 参数与功能比较 1. **信号处理能力** 如果假设 U1253B U1273A 类似于 A 律 13 折线法 μ 律 15 折线法,则可以推测两者在小信号大信号处理上的表现存在差异。通常情况下,类似于 μ 律的设计会更注重小信号的信噪比优化,而 A 律则更适合较大范围内的均衡性能需求。因此,如果 U1273A 更接近 μ 律设计,则其在小信号条件下可能会表现出更高的信噪比,但在大信号条件下的稳定性可能不如 U1253B。 2. **兼容性与写入模式** 参考三星 NAND Flash 的替代方案[K9K8G08U0E 替换 K9K8G08U0B],其中提到通过关闭子页写入模式来实现兼容性调整[^3]。类似的逻辑可应用于 U1253B U1273A:可能存在某些特定选项(如 `NAND_NO_SUBPAGE_WRITE`),用于适配不同的应用场景或硬件环境。这表明两者的内部架构可能支持不同程度的灵活性配置。 3. **应用领域** 结合引用[2]关于不同类型差异性分析的应用场景描述[^2],可以从实际使用角度进一步区分这两种芯片。例如: - 若目标市场主要面向消费级电子产品,则需重点评估成本效益比; - 对于工业控制或者医疗成像等领域,则应更加关注可靠性精确度指标。 4. **网络结构类比** 借助 UNet++ 架构及其变体之间的对比思路[^4],我们也可以尝试从复杂程度、资源消耗等方面探讨二者优劣之处。比如,假定 U1273A 相当于是加入了“深度监督”的增强版本,则它或许能在相同输入规模下取得更好的输出效果,不过代价是增加了计算负担或是功耗水平。 #### 性能测试建议 为了准确了解它们之间的真实差距,有必要借助 MATLAB 或 Python 编程工具完成一系列仿真实验。以下是简单的代码框架供参考: ```matlab % 初始化变量 signalStrength = linspace(0, 1, 100); % 定义信号强度向量 u1253bOutput = zeros(size(signalStrength)); u1273aOutput = zeros(size(signalStrength)); for i = 1:length(signalStrength) s = signalStrength(i); % 计算各自响应曲线 (此处仅为示意函数形式待确认具体表达式) u1253bOutput(i) = log(s + exp(-s)); u1273aOutput(i) = sqrt(abs(log(s))); end figure; plot(signalStrength, u1253bOutput, 'r', signalStrength, u1273aOutput, 'b'); legend('U1253B Response','U1273A Response'); xlabel('Signal Strength'); ylabel('Response Value'); title('Comparison of U1253B vs U1273A Performance'); grid on; ``` 以上脚本仅作为起点模板,最终还需依据厂商给出的确切数学模型加以完善。 ---
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值