matlab 音调
The problem with tone policing — specifically online — is that because it’s hard to fully grasp the tone of a statement on the internet, the concept of arguing against, placing judgment on, or dissecting a person’s tone usually comes down to who feels entitled to enact the perceived rules in the space where the discussion is occurring. Also, to lay it plain, it’s dismissive and, depending on the subject matter and people doing the policing, racist.
语气警务(尤其是在线警务)的问题在于,由于很难完全掌握互联网上的声明语气,因此,争论,对他人的语气作出判断或对人的语气进行剖析的概念通常归结为那些有权颁布的人在进行讨论的空间中的感知规则。 而且,说白了,它是不屑一顾的,并且取决于主题和执行警务的人,种族主义。
“Tone policing has roots in colonialism and white supremacist practices that hold individuals to a certain standard in order to be considered acceptable,” writer Naomi Day explains. “Consider Indigenous children who were forced into boarding schools run by the government or missionaries and forbidden from speaking their native languages, which also separated them from their cultures. Respectability politics is another ancestor of tone policing.”
作家内奥米·戴(Naomi Day)解释说:“警务源于殖民主义和白人至上主义的作法,这些作法使个人达到一定的标准,以便被人们接受。” “考虑土著儿童,他们被迫进入政府或传教士开办的寄宿学校 ,被禁止讲其母语,这也使他们与文化背道而驰。 尊重政治是语气管理的另一祖先。”
翻译自: https://momentum.medium.com/the-problem-with-tone-policing-6cc34eb80844
matlab 音调