C++ 网络库

本文对比分析了POCO库与其他C++库(如Boost、ACE)在多线程、网络、功能集成性、代码易读性、跨平台支持等方面的优势和劣势,提供了选择合适库的建议。

摘要生成于 C知道 ,由 DeepSeek-R1 满血版支持, 前往体验 >

http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/ACE-overview.html

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/992069/ace-vs-boost-vs-poco

http://blog.youkuaiyun.com/langeldep/article/details/6976120

As rdbound said, Boost has a "near STL" status. So if you don't need another library, stick to Boost. However, I use POCO because it has some advantages for my situation. The good things about POCO IMO:

  • Better thread library, especially a Active Method implementation. I also like the fact that you can set the thread priority.

  • More comprehensive network library than boost:asio. However boost::asio is also a very good library.

  • Includes functionality that is not in Boost, like XML, database interface, and logging, to name a few.

  • It is more integrated as one library than Boost.

  • It has clean, modern and understandable C++ code. I find it far easier to understand than most of the Boost libraries (but I am not a template programming expert :)).

  • It can be used on a lot of platforms.

Some disadvantages of POCO are:

  • It has limited documentation. This somewhat offset by the fact that the source is easy to understand.

  • It has a far smaller community and user base than, say, Boost. So if you put a question on Stack Overflow for example, your chances of getting an answer are less than for Boost

  • It remains to be seen how well it will be integrated with the new C++ standard. You know for sure that it will not be a problem for Boost.

I never used ACE, so I can't really comment on it. From what I've heard, people find POCO more modern and easier to use than ACE.

Some answers to the comments by Rahul:

  1. I don't know about versatile and advanced. The POCO thread library provides some functionality that is not in Boost: ActiveMethod and Activity, and ThreadPool. IMO POCO threads are also easier to use and understand, but this is a subjective matter.

  2. POCO network library also provides support for higher level protocols like HTTP and SSL (possibly also in boost::asio, but I am not sure?).

  3. Fair enough.

  4. Integrated library has the advantage of having consistent coding, documentation and general "look and feel".

  5. Being cross-platform is an important feature of POCO, this is not an advantage in relation to Boost.

Again, you should probably only consider POCO if it provides some functionality you need and that is not in Boost.


评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值