On Hat Puzzle 1.2: Solutions

This section we show the solution and comments of the hat puzzle [from winkler's paper]:


Colored Hats (simultaneous version): 

It is not immediately obvious that any players can be saved. Often the first strategy considered is "guessing the majority color" ; e.g. if n=10, each player guesses the color he sees on 4 or more of his 9 teammates. But this results in 10 executions if the colors are distributed 5-and-5, and the most obvious modications to this scheme also result in total carnage in the worst case. 

However, it is easy to save \lfloor n/2 \rfloor players by the following device. Have the players pair up (say husband and wife); each husband chooses the color of his wifes hat and each wife chooses the color she doesn't see on her husbands hat. Clearly, if a couple have the same color hats, the husband will survive; if different ,the wife will survive. 

To see that this is best possible, imagine that the colors are assigned uniformly at random (e.g. by fair coin-flips), instead of by an adversary. Regardless of strategy the probability that any particular player survives is exactly 1/2; therefore the expected number of survivors is exactly n/2. It follows that the minimum number of survivors cannot exceed \lfloor n/2 \rfloor.


Colored Hats (sequential version):

This version of the hats game was passed to me by Girija Narlikar of Bell Labs, who heard it at a party (the previous version was my own response to Girija's problem, but has no doubt been considered many times before). For the sequential version it is easy to see that \lfloor n/2 \rfloor can be saved; for example, players n, n-2, n-4 etc. can each guess the color of the player immediately ahead, so that players n-1, n-3 etc. can echo the most recent guess and save themselves.

It seems like some probabilistic argument such as provided for the simultaneous version should also work here, to show that \lfloor n \rfloor is the most that can be saved. Not so : in fact, all the players except the last can be saved!

The last player (poor fellow) merely calls "red " if he sees an odd number of red hats infront of him, and "blue" otherwise. Player n-1 will now know the color of his own hat; for example, if he hears player n guess "red " and sees an even number of red hats ahead, he knowshis own hat is red. 

Similar reasoning applies to each player going up the line. Player i sums the number of red hats he sees and red guesses he hears; if the number is odd he guesses "red", if even he guesses "blue", and he's right (unless someone screwed up).

Of course the last player can never be saved, so n-1 is best possible.

一、 内容概要 本资源提供了一个完整的“金属板材压弯成型”非线性仿真案例,基于ABAQUS/Explicit或Standard求解器完成。案例精确模拟了模具(凸模、凹模)与金属板材之间的接触、压合过程,直至板材发生塑性弯曲成型。 模型特点:包含完整的模具-工件装配体,定义了刚体约束、通用接触(或面面接触)及摩擦系数。 材料定义:金属板材采用弹塑性材料模型,定义了完整的屈服强度、塑性应变等真实应力-应变数据。 关键结果:提供了成型过程中的板材应力(Mises应力)、塑性应变(PE)、厚度变化​ 云图,以及模具受力(接触力)曲线,完整再现了压弯工艺的力学状态。 二、 适用人群 CAE工程师/工艺工程师:从事钣金冲压、模具设计、金属成型工艺分析与优化的专业人员。 高校师生:学习ABAQUS非线性分析、金属塑性成形理论,或从事相关课题研究的硕士/博士生。 结构设计工程师:需要评估钣金件可制造性(DFM)或预测成型回弹的设计人员。 三、 使用场景及目标 学习目标: 掌握在ABAQUS中设置金属塑性成形仿真的全流程,包括材料定义、复杂接触设置、边界条件与载荷步。 学习如何调试和分析大变形、非线性接触问题的收敛性技巧。 理解如何通过仿真预测成型缺陷(如减薄、破裂、回弹),并与理论或实验进行对比验证。 应用价值:本案例的建模方法与分析思路可直接应用于汽车覆盖件、电器外壳、结构件等钣金产品的冲压工艺开发与模具设计优化,减少试模成本。 四、 其他说明 资源包内包含参数化的INP文件、CAE模型文件、材料数据参考及一份简要的操作要点说明文档。INP文件便于用户直接修改关键参数(如压边力、摩擦系数、行程)进行自主研究。 建议使用ABAQUS 2022或更高版本打开。显式动力学分析(如用Explicit)对计算资源有一定要求。 本案例为教学与工程参考目的提供,用户可基于此框架进行拓展,应用于V型弯曲
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值