source:http://www.eyeondna.com/2007/09/14/what-comes-after-genome-sequencing/
by
Posted September 14, 2007 in
It’s been just over a week since we were all in a tizzy over
and already people are asking, “What next?” And the answer would be: systems biology.According to Dr. Leroy Hood, president of the the
, systems biology is “the science of discovering, modeling, understanding and ultimately engineering at the molecular level the dynamic relationships between the biological molecules that define living organisms.” And over at new member blog, , takes the leap . In published in Molecular Systems Biology, Dr. Church said we need the following:-
Focused population association studies
-
Animal models
-
Functional genomics on the cells from the subjects
As an epidemiologst, I’m particularly interested in population association studies for which many study participants would be recruited to give a sample of their DNA, submit to a lifestyle survey, and commit to follow-ups. The
and in Quebec, Canada are two such examples (please see previous ).In parallel with genome mapping and sequencing, researchers in Europe believe
to delineate which specific genes are producing which specific proteins. Mapping the proteome is considerably more difficult than dealing with the genome because some proteins are present in almost undetectable amounts. It’s also very difficult to know if all proteins have been found if certain genes happen to be inactive at the time of assay.Professor Rudolf Aebersold from the
:The idea would be that if we could map out the whole proteome, we could develop a toolbox structure enabling assays (for detecting proteins) to be done faster and more cheaply.
As you can see, the work fun doesn’t stop with whole genome sequencing. In fact, it’s just begun.
: Proteomics – protein separation from Wellcome Images under Creative Commons
Tags:
, , , , , , ,