--測試如下(Windows2003+SQL2005 sp3)
USE tempdb
go
IF OBJECT_ID ( 'Test' ) IS NOT NULL
DROP TABLE Test
SELECT * INTO Test FROM syscolumns
go
--step1:
DBCC FREEPROCCACHE -- 清空緩存中的執行計劃
--step2:( 執行3次 )
DECLARE @TabName sysname , @ID INT , @SQL NVARCHAR ( 4000)
SET @TabName= 'Test'
SET @ID= 103--@ID{101,102,103} -- 輸入次值,執行3次
SET @SQL= N'SELECT * FROM ' + @TabName+ ' WHERE ID=' + RTRIM ( @ID)+ ' order by ID asc'
EXEC ( @SQL)
-- 查看產執行計劃
SELECT dbName= DB_NAME ( dbID ) , Cacheobjtype, objtype, objid , sql
FROM sys.syscacheobjects WHERE cacheobjtype= 'Compiled Plan' AND objtype IN( 'Adhoc' , 'prepared' ) AND sql LIKE '%Test%' AND sql NOT LIKE '%syscacheobjects%' AND sql NOT LIKE '%msdb.%'
-- 執行計劃產生3次
/*
dbName Cacheobjtype objtype objid sql
tempdb Compiled Plan Adhoc 319724907 SELECT * FROM Test WHERE ID=102 order by ID asc
tempdb Compiled Plan Adhoc 513201771 SELECT * FROM Test WHERE ID=103 order by ID asc
tempdb Compiled Plan Prepared 475976984 (@1 tinyint)SELECT * FROM [Test] WHERE [ID]=@1 ORDER BY [ID] ASC
tempdb Compiled Plan Adhoc 674221447 SELECT * FROM Test WHERE ID=101 order by ID asc
*/
go
--step1:
DBCC FREEPROCCACHE -- 清空緩存中的執行計劃
--step2:( 執行三次 )
DECLARE @TabName sysname , @ID INT , @SQL NVARCHAR ( 4000)
SET @TabName= 'Test'
SET @ID= 101--@ID{101,102,103} -- 輸入次值,執行三次
SET @SQL= N'SELECT * FROM ' + @TabName+ ' WHERE ID=@ID order by ID asc'
exec sp_executesql @stmt= @SQL, @Params= N'@ID int' , @ID= @ID
SELECT dbName= DB_NAME ( dbID ) , Cacheobjtype, objtype, objid , sql FROM sys.syscacheobjects WHERE cacheobjtype= 'Compiled Plan' AND objtype IN( 'Adhoc' , 'prepared' ) AND sql LIKE '%Test%' AND sql NOT LIKE '%syscacheobjects%' AND sql NOT LIKE '%msdb.%'
-- 執行計劃產生1次
/*
dbName Cacheobjtype objtype objid sql
tempdb Compiled Plan Prepared 421211796 (@ID int)SELECT * FROM Test WHERE ID=@ID order by ID asc
*/
本文通过具体实验演示了在SQL Server中如何使用参数化查询和动态SQL来影响执行计划的缓存,进而提高查询效率。文章对比了两种不同方法产生的执行计划数量,展示了参数化查询减少重复计划缓存的优势。
2592

被折叠的 条评论
为什么被折叠?



