NLP - text classification

Architecture

在这里插入图片描述

在这里插入图片描述

Disadvantage of Shallow Learning

  • need feature engineering
  • disregard the natural sequential structure / contexted information, hard to learn semantic information

Advantage of Deep Learning

  • avoid designing rules and features by human
  • semantically meaning

Text Classification Methods:

extracting features from row text data and predicting the categories of text data

Shallow Learning Methods

  • preprocess data: word segmentation, data cleaning, data statistics

  • text representation: 使text形成计算机更易计算/理解的方式:Bag-of-words (BOW), N-gram, term frequency-inverse document frequency (TF-IDF), word2vec and GloVe

    • BOW: representing each text with a dictionary-sized vector
      • 缺点:cannot properly capture more complex linguistic phenomena in sentiment analysis
      • “white blood cells destroying an infection” and “an infection destroying white blood cells” have the same bag-of-words representation,但前者positive reaction后者negative reaction
    • N-gram: considers the information of adjacent words and builds a dictionary by considering the adjacent words
    • TF-IDF: word frequency and inverses the document frequency to model the text
    • word2vec: employs local context information to obtain word vectors
    • GloVe: with both the local context and global statistical features – trains on the nonzero elements in a word-word co-occurrence matrix
  • feed the text representation to classifier

    • SVM
    • Naive Bayes
    • KNN
    • Decision Tree

Deep Learning Methods

Recursive Neural Network Based Methods
  • Recursive Neural Network [https://zybuluo.com/hanbingtao/note/626300

    • motivation
      • RNN循环神经网络是将长度不定的输入分割为长度相等的小块输入,如一句话拆分为多个单词,一次输入一个词来处理任意长度的句子。但单纯的序列是不够的,如考虑一句话在不同断句下可能有不同意思,为了表明这些不一样的意思,可以构建树结构/图结构去储存信息。此时需要用到的是递归神经网络去讲一个树/图结构编码为相应向量再去计算向量远近
      • forward-propagation
        • 子节点编码产生父节点,父节点维度与子节点相同。
        • 子节点与父节点之间的神经元为全连接结构。
      • backward-propagation:BPTS
        • 父节点—>子节点
  • Recursive Autoencoder (RAE)

    • Semi-Supervised Recursive Autoencoders for Predicting Sentiment Distributions

    • Contribution

      • Instead of using a BOW, hierarchical structure and uses compositional semantics to understand sentiment.
      • 有标签和无标签的数据都能使用
      • 不限于positive/negative sentiment, predict a multidimensional distribution over several complex, interconnected sentiments.
    • Neural Word Representation: Word Embedding

      • 每个word vector: n × 1 n\times1 n×1,|V|个vocabulary,embedding matrix L: n × ∣ V ∣ n\times|V| n×V
        • 方法一:每个word vector从mean为0的Gaussian Distribution中随机采样得到,然后逐步调整去拟合label的distribution
        • 方法二:用jointly learn an embedding of words into a vector space and use these vectors to predict how likely a word occurs given its context的model,采用gradient ascent的方式学习从co-occurrence学习syntactic and semantic information
    • 如何对于给定的由m个word组成的句子选取相应的embedding

      • 每个word有自己的index k,k标记word所在的位置,考虑one-hot向量 b k b_k bk=[0,0,…1,0,…,0]
      • 选取embedding可以看做是矩阵乘法: L b k Lb_k Lbk n × ∣ V ∣ × ∣ V ∣ × 1 = n × 1 n\times|V|\times|V|\times1 = n\times1 n×V×V×1=n×1
      • 之前用的binary number representation,现在是用vector组成list,为了方便continuous sigmoid unit。
    • 如何得到reduced dimensional vector representation在这里插入图片描述

      • 传统方法

        • 父节点由两个子节点得到,以 x 3 , x 4 x_3, x_4 x3,x4 y 1 y_1 y1为例
        • y 1 = a c t i v a t e _ f u n c t i o n ( W 1 [ x 3 , x 4 ] + b ) y_1 = activate\_function(W^1[x_3,x_4]+b) y1=activate_function(W1[x3,x4]+b)。其中, [ x 3 , x 4 ] [x_3,x_4] [x3,x4]表示两个vector的cat; W 1 W^1 W1为相应系数矩阵, n × 2 n n\times2n n×2n;b为bias,激活函数通常为tahn
        • loss来自于用得到的 y 1 y_1 y1重构 [ x 3 ^ , x 4 ^ ] [\hat{x_3},\hat{x_4}] [x3^,x4^],用重构的与原来的算Euclidean Distance。
      • 本文方法: unsupervised

        • assume sentence有m个word, [ x 1 , x 2 , . . . , x m ] [x_1,x_2,...,x_m] [x1,x2,...,xm],遍历所有相邻pair [ x i , x i + 1 ] [x_i,x_{i+1}] [xi,xi+1],储存reconstruction error,取最小error的pair construct parent p p p,替换two children为parent p p p直至全部替换。e.g. [ x 1 , x 2 , x 3 , x 4 ] − − − > [ x 1 , x 2 , p ( 3 , 4 ) ] [x_1,x_2,x_3,x_4]--->[x_1,x_2,p_{(3,4)}] [x1,x2,x3,x4]>[x1,x2,p(3,4)]

        • 这里reconstruction error的问题,已经合并过多次的父节点通常比合并次数少/未合并的节点具有更大的weight。所以这里添加相应系数在这里插入图片描述

        • length normalization: y 1 = y 1 ÷ ∣ ∣ y 1 ∣ ∣ y_1 = y_1\div||y_1|| y1=y1÷y1

      • 本文方法: semi-supervised

        • motivation:extend RAE to predict a sentence/phrase level distribution
        • RAE天然的具有了捕捉phrase feature的能力,因为parent node也有自己的distributed vector,而上层的parent可以被看做phrase feature
        • 加cross-entropy error
          • predict parent label的概率 d K d_K dK, s o f t m a x ( W l a b e l p ) softmax(W^{label}p) softmax(Wlabelp), 一共K个label, ∑ d k = 1 \sum d_k = 1 dk=1, d k d_k dk可认为是给定两个子节点时父节点为K类的conditional probability。
          • 则cross-entropy为在这里插入图片描述
          • 此时损失函数为normalize+加权后的reconstruction error 和 cross-entropy error: α E r e c o n s t r u c t i o n − e r r o r + ( 1 − α ) E c r o s s − e n t r o p y \alpha E_{reconstruction-error}+(1-\alpha)E_{cross-entropy} αEreconstructionerror+(1α)Ecrossentropy
  • MV-RNN

  • RNTN

  • DeepReNN

Multilayer Perceptron Based Methods
  • Paragraph-Vec: Distributed Representations of Sentences and Documents
    • 概要:认为BOW存在问题-未关注word order+未关注semantics,所以提出Paragraph Vector to learn fix length feature representations from variable length,并在一些text classification 和 sentiment analysis task

Datasets

  • Sentiment Analysis (SA): binary class and multi-class

  • News Classification (NC): recognizing news topics and recommending related news according to user interest.

  • Question Answering (QA)

    • Extractive QA: multiple candidate answers for each question to choose which one is the right answer
    • Generative QA: 自己生成答案,通常不被认为是text classification
  • Natural Language Inference (NLI): identify whether the meaning of one text can be deduced from another

Evaluation Metrics

  • Single-label: divides the text into one of the most likely categories

    • Acc + Error Rate
    • Precision + Recall + F1: for unbalanced test set
    • Exact Match (EM): for QA measuring the prediction that matches all the ground-truth answers precisely
    • Mean Reciprocal Rank (MRR): for QA and Information Retrieval tasks
    • Hamming-loss (HL): assesses the score of misclassified instance-label pairs where a related label is omitted or an unrelated is predicted
  • Multi-label

    • Micro-F1
    • Macro-F1
    • Precision at Top K (P@K)
2009年新书,非扫描 Contents List of Figures xiii List of Tables xix Introduction xxi About the Editors xxvii Contributor List xxix 1 Analysis of Text Patterns Using Kernel Methods 1 Marco Turchi, Alessia Mammone, and Nello Cristianini 1.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1.2 General Overview on Kernel Methods . . . . . . . 1 1.2.1 Finding Patterns in Feature Space . . . . . . . . . . . 5 1.2.2 Formal Properties of Kernel Functions . . . . . . . . . 8 1.2.3 Operations on Kernel Functions . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 1.3 Kernels for Text . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 1.3.1 Vector SpaceModel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 1.3.2 Semantic Kernels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 1.3.3 String Kernels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 1.4 Example . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 1.5 Conclusion and Further Reading . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 2 Detection of Bias in Media Outlets with Statistical Learning Methods 27 Blaz Fortuna, Carolina Galleguillos, and Nello Cristianini 2.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 2.2 Overview of the Experiments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 2.3 Data Collection and Preparation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 2.3.1 Article Extraction from HTML Pages . . . . . . . . . 31 2.3.2 Data Preparation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 2.3.3 Detection of Matching News Items . . . . . . . . . . . 32 2.4 News Outlet Identification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 2.5 Topic-Wise Comparison of Term Bias . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 2.6 News OutletsMap . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 2.6.1 Distance Based on Lexical Choices . . . . . . . . . . . 42 vii © 2009 by Taylor and Francis Group, LLC viii 2.6.2 Distance Based on Choice of Topics . . . . . . . . . . 43 2.7 RelatedWork . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 2.8 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 2.9 Appendix A: Support Vector Machines . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 2.10 Appendix B: Bag of Words and Vector Space Models . . . . . 48 2.11 Appendix C: Kernel Canonical Correlation Analysis . . . . . 49 2.12 Appendix D: Multidimensional Scaling . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 3 Collective Classification for Text Classification 51 Galileo Namata, Prithviraj Sen, Mustafa Bilgic, and Lise Getoor 3.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 3.2 Collective Classification: Notation and Problem Definition . . 53 3.3 Approximate Inference Algorithms for Approaches Based on Local Conditional Classifiers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 3.3.1 Iterative Classification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 3.3.2 Gibbs Sampling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 3.3.3 Local Classifiers and Further Optimizations . . . . . . 55 3.4 Approximate Inference Algorithms for Approaches Based on Global Formulations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 3.4.1 Loopy Belief Propagation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 3.4.2 Relaxation Labeling via Mean-Field Approach . . . . 59 3.5 Learning the Classifiers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 3.6 Experimental Comparison . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 3.6.1 Features Used . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 3.6.2 Real-World Datasets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 3.6.3 Practical Issues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63 3.7 RelatedWork . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64 3.8 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 3.9 Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 4 Topic Models 71 David M. Blei and John D. Lafferty 4.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71 4.2 Latent Dirichlet Allocation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72 4.2.1 Statistical Assumptions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73 4.2.2 Exploring a Corpus with the Posterior Distribution . . 75 4.3 Posterior Inference for LDA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76 4.3.1 Mean Field Variational Inference . . . . . . . . . . . . 78 4.3.2 Practical Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81 4.4 Dynamic Topic Models and Correlated Topic Models . . . . . 82 4.4.1 The Correlated Topic Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82 4.4.2 The Dynamic Topic Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84 4.5 Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89 © 2009 by Taylor and Francis Group, LLC ix 5 Nonnegative Matrix and Tensor Factorization for Discussion Tracking 95 Brett W. Bader, Michael W. Berry, and Amy N. Langville 5.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95 5.1.1 Extracting Discussions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96 5.1.2 RelatedWork . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96 5.2 Notation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97 5.3 Tensor Decompositions and Algorithms . . . . . . . . . . . . 98 5.3.1 PARAFAC-ALS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100 5.3.2 Nonnegative Tensor Factorization . . . . . . . . . . . . 100 5.4 Enron Subset . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102 5.4.1 TermWeighting Techniques . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103 5.5 Observations and Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105 5.5.1 Nonnegative Tensor Decomposition . . . . . . . . . . . 105 5.5.2 Analysis of Three-Way Tensor . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106 5.5.3 Analysis of Four-Way Tensor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108 5.6 Visualizing Results of the NMF Clustering . . . . . . . . . . . 111 5.7 FutureWork . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 116 6 Text Clustering with Mixture of von Mises-Fisher Distributions 121 Arindam Banerjee, Inderjit Dhillon, Joydeep Ghosh, and Suvrit Sra 6.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121 6.2 RelatedWork . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123 6.3 Preliminaries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124 6.3.1 The von Mises-Fisher (vMF) Distribution . . . . . . . 124 6.3.2 Maximum Likelihood Estimates . . . . . . . . . . . . . 125 6.4 EMon aMixture of vMFs (moVMF) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126 6.5 Handling High-Dimensional Text Datasets . . . . . . . . . . . 127 6.5.1 Approximating κ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 128 6.5.2 Experimental Study of the Approximation . . . . . . . 130 6.6 Algorithms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 132 6.7 Experimental Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 134 6.7.1 Datasets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 135 6.7.2 Methodology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138 6.7.3 Simulated Datasets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138 6.7.4 Classic3 Family of Datasets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 140 6.7.5 Yahoo News Dataset . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143 6.7.6 20 Newsgroup Family of Datasets . . . . . . . . . . . . 143 6.7.7 Slashdot Datasets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 145 6.8 Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 146 6.9 Conclusions and Future Work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 148 © 2009 by Taylor and Francis Group, LLC x 7 Constrained Partitional Clustering of Text Data: An Overview 155 Sugato Basu and Ian Davidson 7.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 155 7.2 Uses of Constraints . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 157 7.2.1 Constraint-Based Methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 157 7.2.2 Distance-BasedMethods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 158 7.3 Text Clustering . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 159 7.3.1 Pre-Processing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 161 7.3.2 DistanceMeasures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 162 7.4 Partitional Clustering with Constraints . . . . . . . . . . . . 163 7.4.1 COP-KMeans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 163 7.4.2 Algorithms with Penalties – PKM, CVQE . . . . . . . 164 7.4.3 LCVQE: An Extension to CVQE . . . . . . . . . . . . 167 7.4.4 Probabilistic Penalty – PKM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 167 7.5 Learning Distance Function with Constraints . . . . . . . . . 168 7.5.1 Generalized Mahalanobis Distance Learning . . . . . . 168 7.5.2 Kernel Distance Functions Using AdaBoost . . . . . . 169 7.6 Satisfying Constraints and Learning Distance Functions . . . 170 7.6.1 Hidden Markov Random Field (HMRF) Model . . . . 170 7.6.2 EMAlgorithm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 173 7.6.3 Improvements to HMRF-KMeans . . . . . . . . . . . 173 7.7 Experiments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 174 7.7.1 Datasets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 174 7.7.2 Clustering Evaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 175 7.7.3 Methodology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 176 7.7.4 Comparison of Distance Functions . . . . . . . . . . . 176 7.7.5 Experimental Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 177 7.8 Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 180 8 Adaptive Information Filtering 185 Yi Zhang 8.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 185 8.2 Standard EvaluationMeasures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 188 8.3 Standard Retrieval Models and Filtering Approaches . . . . . 190 8.3.1 Existing Retrieval Models . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 190 8.3.2 Existing Adaptive Filtering Approaches . . . . . . . . 192 8.4 CollaborativeAdaptive Filtering . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 194 8.5 Novelty and Redundancy Detection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 196 8.5.1 Set Difference . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 199 8.5.2 Geometric Distance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 199 8.5.3 Distributional Similarity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200 8.5.4 Summary of Novelty Detection . . . . . . . . . . . . . 201 8.6 Other Adaptive Filtering Topics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 201 8.6.1 Beyond Bag ofWords . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 202 © 2009 by Taylor and Francis Group, LLC xi 8.6.2 Using Implicit Feedback . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 202 8.6.3 Exploration and Exploitation Trade Off . . . . . . . . 203 8.6.4 Evaluation beyond Topical Relevance . . . . . . . . . 203 8.7 Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 204 9 Utility-Based Information Distillation 213 Yiming Yang and Abhimanyu Lad 9.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 213 9.1.1 Related Work in Adaptive Filtering (AF) . . . . . . . 213 9.1.2 Related Work in Topic Detection and Tracking (TDT) 214 9.1.3 Limitations of Current Solutions . . . . . . . . . . . . 215 9.2 A Sample Task . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 216 9.3 Technical Cores . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 218 9.3.1 Adaptive Filtering Component . . . . . . . . . . . . . 218 9.3.2 Passage Retrieval Component . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 219 9.3.3 Novelty Detection Component . . . . . . . . . . . . . 220 9.3.4 Anti-Redundant Ranking Component . . . . . . . . . 220 9.4 EvaluationMethodology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 221 9.4.1 Answer Keys . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 221 9.4.2 Evaluating the Utility of a Sequence of Ranked Lists . 223 9.5 Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 225 9.6 Experiments and Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 226 9.6.1 Baselines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 226 9.6.2 Experimental Setup . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 226 9.6.3 Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 227 9.7 Concluding Remarks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 229 9.8 Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 229 10 Text Search-Enhanced with Types and Entities 233 Soumen Chakrabarti, Sujatha Das, Vijay Krishnan, and Kriti Puniyani 10.1 Entity-Aware Search Architecture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 233 10.1.1 Guessing Answer Types . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 234 10.1.2 Scoring Snippets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 235 10.1.3 Efficient Indexing and Query Processing . . . . . . . . 236 10.1.4 Comparison with Prior Work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 236 10.2 Understanding the Question . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 236 10.2.1 Answer Type Clues in Questions . . . . . . . . . . . . 239 10.2.2 Sequential Labeling of Type Clue Spans . . . . . . . . 240 10.2.3 From Type Clue Spans to Answer Types . . . . . . . . 245 10.2.4 Experiments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 247 10.3 Scoring Potential Answer Snippets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 251 10.3.1 A ProximityModel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 253 10.3.2 Learning the Proximity Scoring Function . . . . . . . 255 10.3.3 Experiments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 257 10.4 Indexing and Query Processing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 260 © 2009 by Taylor and Francis Group, LLC xii 10.4.1 Probability of a Query Atype . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 262 10.4.2 Pre-Generalize and Post-Filter . . . . . . . . . . . . . 262 10.4.3 Atype Subset Index Space Model . . . . . . . . . . . . 265 10.4.4 Query Time BloatModel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 266 10.4.5 Choosing an Atype Subset . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 269 10.4.6 Experiments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 271 10.5 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 272 10.5.1 Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 272 10.5.2 Ongoing and Future Work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 273 © 2009
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值