0505写作02

 

11111111

More people are using mobile phones and computers to communicate. Therefore, people are losing the ability to communicate with each other face to face. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

 

Increase in use of electronic equipment, an increasing number of people prefer to chat by social network. In my opinion, this will lead to a loss of people’s ability of communication.

 

Nowadays, plenty of social apps and software appear on the mobile phones and computers. This new kind of communication mode help people contact with others more convenient. Concretely speaking, most people prefer chat with friends by some apps instead of meeting face to face. Because people do not have enough time to visit their friends’ home or go out together to have a meal. If people want to say something, they can just send a message immediately, which will only take them a few seconds. In a word, the Internet has brought people closer.

 

However, excessive network communication have a negative impact on people’s ability of expression. When people are sending messages, they actually are reading words and typing. In other words, they do not use ability in oral expression as well as auditory system. If things continue this way, people’s language skills will be weakened. In short, people are losing the ability to communicate with each other face to face.

 

From my personal perspective, if people always choose to contact by network, to some extent they might be nervous when they have communicate face to face. Network communication allows people have a lot of time to check their wording and expression, people can choose the best way to express their ideas. But authentic communication is totally different, concentration and improvisation are the most important. In brief, people may have to deal with tension.

 

In my opinion, people are losing the language skills. Although network is convenient, it will have a adverse influence on the ability of face-to-face communication.

 

 

 

 

22222222222222222

Some people think charity organizations should help people in great need wherever they live. However, others think they should help people in their own country. Discuss both opinions and give your own opinion.

 

An increasing number of charity organizations appeared in many countries. Some people claim that charities should help people all around the world, but others think they should help people in their own country. In my opinion, I support the former.

 

If charity organizations concentrate the funds to its own country, some charity projects can speed up. Concretely speaking, if some institution use all the resources to help certain areas in one country, these areas will be greatly helped. Some people may improve their living standard in a short time. In a word, native people will get better help because of the concentration of charities.

 

However, as a matter of fact, many countries have few charity organizations, some cities even do not have any institution. If some people who live in the poverty or wartime get help, it is like to save them from the dark abyss. A slice of bread or a bottle of water which means nothing to most people may become a life-saving straw to some pathetic people. In short, poor people in other countries will get great help.

 

From my personal perspective, international charity organizations can greatly promote the relationship of many countries. In the process of aid, people of different races from different countries may build firm relationships. In brief, friendships can improve relationship between countries.

 

In conclusion, charity organizations should help people in great need wherever they live. Although some native people need help, aid some foreign people may make the world better.