Issues:
Plaintext Management Interfaces Accessible On Cisco Device port 2002/tcp
PCI COMPLIANCE STATUS
PCI Severity: MED
FAIL
VULNERABILITY DETAILS
CVSS Base Score: 4 AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
CVSS Temporal Score: 3.6 E:F/RL:W/RC:C
Severity: 3
QID: 38250
Category: General remote services
CVE ID: –
Vendor Reference: –
Bugtraq ID: –
Last Update: 10/31/2012
THREAT:
The target is determined to be a Cisco device, which uses protocols such as HTTP, TELNET, rlogin, FTP, and SNMP for configuration management.
These services can be accessed and are an invitation for malicious users to break in.
The port string mentioned with this vulnerability should identify the service in question.
IMPACT:
Malicious users can exploit this vulnerability to deploy a range of known attacks against accessible services. Brute force attacks such as password
guessing and Denial Of Service are also possible.
SOLUTION:
Consider taking the following precautionary measures:
Disable services that are not needed.
Consider putting access controls on these services. Access controls can be put together using the features in the device (if available) or using an
external firewall.
Do not use default passwords and replace them with hard to guess passwords. Change passwords frequently.
RESULT:
Service name: TELNET(Cisco) on TCP port 2002.
Plaintext Management Interfaces Accessible On Cisco Device port 9002/tcp
PCI COMPLIANCE STATUS
PCI Severity: MED
FAIL
VULNERABILITY DETAILS
CVSS Base Score: 4 AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
CVSS Temporal Score: 3.6 E:F/RL:W/RC:C
Severity: 3
QID: 38250
Category: General remote services
CVE ID: –
Vendor Reference: –
Bugtraq ID: –
Last Update: 10/31/2012
THREAT:
The target is determined to be a Cisco device, which uses protocols such as HTTP, TELNET, rlogin, FTP, and SNMP for configuration management.
These services can be accessed and are an invitation for malicious users to break in.
The port string mentioned with this vulnerability should identify the service in question.
IMPACT:
Malicious users can exploit this vulnerability to deploy a range of known attacks against accessible services. Brute force attacks such as password
guessing and Denial Of Service are also possible.
SOLUTION:
Consider taking the following precautionary measures:
Disable services that are not needed.
Consider putting access controls on these services. Access controls can be put together using the features in the device (if available) or using an
external firewall.
Do not use default passwords and replace them with hard to guess passwords. Change passwords frequently.
RESULT:
Service name: TELNET(Cisco) on TCP port 9002.
Screenshots:
R1#show control-plane host open-ports
Active internet connections (servers and established)
Prot Local Address Foreign Address Service State
tcp *:22 *:0 SSH-Server LISTEN
tcp *:23 *:0 Telnet LISTEN
tcp *:2002 88.198.46.51:58719 TCP Protocols ESTABLIS
udp *:123 *:0 NTP LISTEN
udp *:4500 *:0 ISAKMP LISTEN
udp *:161 *:0 IP SNMP LISTEN
udp *:162 *:0 IP SNMP LISTEN
udp *:1975 *:0 IPC LISTEN
udp *:57430 *:0 IP SNMP LISTEN
udp *:500 *:0 ISAKMP LISTEN
Root Cause:
- Complete disable line 2 access
- put an access list on the Line 2 for IPv4 and IPv6.
Solution:
line 2
transport input none
本文详细介绍了在Cisco设备上发现的安全漏洞,包括Telnet接口的未授权访问,导致的中等风险PCI合规性失败。文章提供了漏洞细节、威胁描述、影响分析及解决方案,建议禁用不必要的服务并实施访问控制来增强安全性。


951

被折叠的 条评论
为什么被折叠?



