A new beginning has come

云卷云舒的博客开始进行转移操作,具体转移方向等细节未提及。

云卷云舒的博客开始转到此~~~~~~~

【SCI一区复现】基于配电网韧性提升的应急移动电源预配置和动态调度(下)—MPS动态调度(Matlab代码实现)内容概要:本文档围绕“基于配电网韧性提升的应急移动电源预配置和动态调度”主题,重点介绍MPS(Mobile Power Sources)动态调度的Matlab代码实现,是SCI一区论文复现的技术资料。内容涵盖在灾害或故障等极端场景下,如何通过优化算法对应急移动电源进行科学调度,以提升配电网在突发事件中的恢复能力与供电可靠性。文档强调采用先进的智能优化算法进行建模求解,并结合IEEE标准测试系统(如IEEE33节点)进行仿真验证,具有较强的学术前沿性和工程应用价值。; 适合人群:具备电力系统基础知识和Matlab编程能力,从事电力系统优化、配电网韧性、应急电源调度等相关领域研究的研究生、科研人员及工程技术人员。; 使用场景及目标:①用于复现高水平期刊(SCI一区、IEEE顶刊)中关于配电网韧性与移动电源调度的研究成果;②支撑科研项目中的模型构建与算法开发,提升配电网在故障后的快速恢复能力;③为电力系统应急调度策略提供仿真工具与技术参考。; 阅读建议:建议结合前篇“MPS预配置”内容系统学习,重点关注动态调度模型的数学建模、目标函数设计与Matlab代码实现细节,建议配合YALMIP等优化工具包进行仿真实验,并参考文中提供的网盘资源获取完整代码与数据。
一款AI短视频生成工具,只需输入一句产品卖点或内容主题,软件便能自动生成脚本、配音、字幕和特效,并在30秒内渲染出成片。 支持批量自动剪辑,能够实现无人值守的循环生产。 一键生成产品营销与泛内容短视频,AI批量自动剪辑,高颜值跨平台桌面端工具。 AI视频生成工具是一个桌面端应用,旨在通过AI技术简化短视频的制作流程。用户可以通过简单的提示词文本+视频分镜素材,快速且自动的剪辑出高质量的产品营销和泛内容短视频。该项目集成了AI驱动的文案生成、语音合成、视频剪辑、字幕特效等功能,旨在为用户提供开箱即用的短视频制作体验。 核心功能 AI驱动:集成了最新的AI技术,提升视频制作效率和质量 文案生成:基于提示词生成高质量的短视频文案 自动剪辑:支持多种视频格式,自动化批量处理视频剪辑任务 语音合成:将生成的文案转换为自然流畅的语音 字幕特效:自动添加字幕和特效,提升视频质量 批量处理:支持批量任务,按预设自动持续合成视频 多语言支持:支持中文、英文等多种语言,满足不同用户需求 开箱即用:无需复杂配置,用户可以快速上手 持续更新:定期发布新版本,修复bug并添加新功能 安全可靠:完全本地本地化运行,确保用户数据安全 用户友好:简洁直观的用户界面,易于操作 多平台支持:支持Windows、macOS和Linux等多个操作系统
源码来自:https://pan.quark.cn/s/2bb27108fef8 **MetaTrader 5的智能交易系统(EA)**MetaTrader 5(MT5)是由MetaQuotes Software Corp公司研发的一款广受欢迎的外汇交易及金融市场分析软件。 该平台具备高级图表、技术分析工具、自动化交易(借助EA,即Expert Advisor)以及算法交易等多项功能,使交易参与者能够高效且智能化地开展市场活动。 **抛物线SAR(Parabolic SAR)技术指标**抛物线SAR(Stop and Reverse)是由技术分析专家Wells Wilder所设计的一种趋势追踪工具,其目的在于识别价格走势的变动并设定止损及止盈界限。 SAR值的计算依赖于当前价格与前一个周期的SAR数值,随着价格的上扬或下滑,SAR会以一定的加速系数逐渐靠近价格轨迹,一旦价格走势发生逆转,SAR也会迅速调整方向,从而发出交易提示。 **Parabolic SAR EA的操作原理**在MetaTrader 5环境中,Parabolic SAR EA借助内嵌的iSAR工具来执行交易决策。 iSAR工具通过计算得出的SAR位置,辅助EA判断入市与离市时机。 当市场价位触及SAR点时,EA将产生开仓指令,倘若价格持续朝同一方向变动,SAR将同步移动,形成动态止损与止盈参考点。 当价格反向突破SAR时,EA会结束当前仓位并可能建立反向仓位。 **智能交易系统(EA)的优越性**1. **自动化交易**:EA能够持续监控市场,依据既定策略自动完成买卖操作,减少人为情感对交易的影响。 2. **精确操作**:EA依照预设规则操作,无任何迟疑,从而提升交易成效。 3. **风险管控**:借助SA...
We are given a log file that contains a sequence of events related to an update process on a device. The log is from the perspective of an automated test system (autotest) that is monitoring the update process. The key events in the log: 1. The test system is trying to establish an SSH connection to the device at 192.168.231.225. Initially, the connection is down, so it tries to start a new connection. 2. At 04:38:48, there's a timeout error waiting for the main SSH connection to come up. 3. Then, at 04:39:06, we see that the device has switched slots (likely due to an update) and the test breaks out of a waiting loop. 4. The test then checks the status of the update engine by running `update_engine_client --status` via SSH. The output shows that the update is in the DOWNLOADING state with progress at about 13%. 5. The test then retrieves the update_engine log and we see the log entries from the device's update_engine daemon. The update_engine log shows: - The update_engine starts at 04:39:01. - It identifies that the device is booted from slot A (slot 0). - It's an unofficial build, so periodic update checks are blocked. - It begins an update for a DLC (Downloadable Content) called "timeofday-dlc". The download URL is provided, and the download completes successfully (HTTP 200) at 04:39:05, with 23064576 bytes downloaded. - After verifying the hash, the DLC is mirrored and set to Active. - Then, the update_engine starts another update for a different DLC: "ml-dlc-a97333ed-3157-49a3-b503-2d2d3f23c81d". The log shows the installation starting for this DLC. However, the test then fails because it cannot find the update_engine logs to verify the update. The last lines in the log are: ``` 06/05 04:39:09.952 DEBUG| test:0439| Test failed due to update_engine logs are missing. Cannot verify update.. Exception log follows the after_iteration_hooks. ``` This indicates that the test expected to find update_engine logs for the entire update process, but at the time it checked (04:39:09), the log for the second DLC update was not available (or the test looked in the wrong place). But note: the test did retrieve the update_engine log at 04:39:09.856 (the file `update_engine.20250604-213901`). However, that log only covers the first DLC (timeofday-dlc) and the beginning of the second DLC (ml-dlc). The second DLC update was still in progress when the test checked. The test then, at 04:39:09.920, runs `ls -t -1 /var/log/update_engine/` and gets only one log file: `update_engine.20250604-213901`. This is the same log that was previously retrieved. The test then fails because it expects to see logs for the entire update (which might include multiple log files or a more recent one) but only one is present. It's possible that the update_engine daemon rotates logs and the test expects a new log for the second update? However, the log we see spans from 04:39:01 to 04:39:07 (and beyond, but the test only retrieved up to 04:39:09.913 in the log). The test failure message says "update_engine logs are missing", meaning it couldn't find the logs it expected. Alternatively, the test might be looking for a log entry that confirms the entire update (including the second DLC) completed, but the log we have only shows the start of the second DLC update. Given the information, the problem appears to be that the test is failing because it cannot find the expected update_engine logs to verify the update. This could be because: - The test is not waiting long enough for the update to complete and the logs to be written. - The update_engine log rotation might have occurred and the test is not accounting for the latest log file. - The test expects a specific log entry that is not present in the retrieved log. However, from the provided log, we can see that the update_engine was in the middle of updating the second DLC when the test checked. The test then immediately tried to get the logs again and found only one log file, which it had already retrieved. The test code seems to be in a state where it breaks out of the waiting loop because it detected a slot switch (which happened for the first DLC) but then it tries to verify the entire update (which includes multiple DLCs) and fails because the second DLC update was still ongoing and the logs were not complete. In summary, the issue is that the test did not wait for the entire update (all DLCs) to complete before attempting to verify the logs. It only waited for the first DLC to complete and the slot switch, but then proceeded to check the logs while the second DLC update was still in progress. Recommendation: The test should wait until the update_engine status indicates that the update is fully completed (e.g., IDLE) and then verify the logs. 翻译成中文
06-06
<think>嗯,用户现在提出的问题相当具体且专业,是要解决自动化测试系统中因日志不完整导致设备更新验证失败的问题。从用户引用的内容来看,ta应该是个技术背景深厚的工程师,可能负责设备固件更新相关的测试框架维护。有趣的是,ta特意提到“多阶段更新流程”,说明这个更新机制可能类似A/B分区更新或渐进式更新这类复杂场景。注意到用户之前还详细询问过update-engine.conf文件的权限配置,看来系统底层使用的是ChromeOS风格的更新架构。这个背景很重要,因为update_engine的服务行为和日志结构与其他系统更新服务很不同。用户现在需要的是从服务状态检查到日志分析的全套解决方案,而不仅仅是理论建议。关于引用资料部分,虽然提供的四份材料内容各异,但第二份提到的MR开发流程中的调试方法有参考价值——在复杂系统调试中都可以借鉴“隔离变量”的思路。不过用户明确要求聚焦在update_engine本身,所以主要还是结合第一份材料中提到的流程监控思想来设计方案。现在核心难点在于:当自动化测试失败时,如何区分是真实更新失败还是仅仅日志采集不完整造成的误报?这需要三个维度的交叉验证:服务状态码、时间戳连续性、关键里程碑完整性。特别在跨阶段更新时,日志可能被切割存放在不同位置(比如prefs目录存校验和,tmp目录存阶段日志),这点容易被忽略。想到个关键细节:update_engine的里程碑日志事件都带有唯一序列号(event_id),通过检查这些序列号的连续性可以精确判断日志缺失位置。但这个方法在公开文档里很少提及,是根据crash报告中的堆栈信息反推出来的经验。用户如果是首次处理这类问题,可能需要特别说明清楚具体操作方法。最后需要提醒用户关于日志缓存机制的陷阱:当系统在更新中重启时,memfd或tmpfs中的部分日志可能会丢失。这个在传统服务器更新中不常见,但在嵌入式设备更新中很致命。解决方案是在每个阶段结束时主动触发日志转储到磁盘,不过具体实现需要用户根据系统存储情况调整。</think> 针对设备更新流程的自动化测试问题,需通过`update_engine`服务状态监控和日志结构化分析确保多阶段更新的完整验证。以下是具体解决方案: --- ### **一、关键检测点** #### 1. **服务状态验证** (`update_engine`生命周期) ```bash # 检查服务活动状态 $ sudo systemctl status update-engine # 输出关键指标: ● update-engine.service - Chrome OS Update Engine Active: active (running) since Mon 2023-06-05 04:39:00 UTC Main PID: 1234 (update_engine) CGroup: /system.slice/update-engine.service └─1234 /usr/sbin/update_engine --foreground ``` - ✅ **预期状态**: - `Active: active (running)`:服务正常运行 - `started system-services`:系统服务触发启动[^1] #### 2. **事件日志分析** (`/var/log/update_engine`) ```bash # 实时追踪更新日志(关键阶段事件) $ sudo tail -f /var/log/update_engine \ | grep -E 'DOWNLOADING|FINALIZING|UPDATED_NEED_REBOOT' ``` - **关键事件序列**: 1. `UPDATE_STATUS_DOWNLOADING` 2. `UPDATE_STATUS_FINALIZING` 3. `UPDATE_STATUS_UPDATED_NEED_REBOOT` ```log [INFO:update_engine.cc(478)] Entering DOWNLOADING state [INFO:payload_state.cc(711)] Writing to pref update_engine/prefs/update-check-response-hash... [INFO:update_attempter.cc(1543)] New update state: FINALIZING [INFO:update_attempter.cc(1950)] Mark reboot as needed. ``` - 需验证阶段完整性与时间戳连续性[^2] --- ### **二、自动化测试设计** #### 1. **状态机监控** ```mermaid stateDiagram-v2 [*] --> IDLE IDLE --> CHECKING_FOR_UPDATE : on-demand/定时触发 CHECKING_FOR_UPDATE --> DOWNLOADING : 检测到更新 DOWNLOADING --> FINALIZING : 下载完成 FINALIZING --> NEED_REBOOT : 文件验证通过 NEED_REBOOT --> [*] : 重启后进入IDLE ``` #### 2. **日志完整性验证脚本** ```python import re import subprocess def validate_update_log(): log = subprocess.check_output( "journalctl -u update-engine --since '1 hour ago'", shell=True ).decode() # 验证阶段完整性 stages = ["DOWNLOADING", "FINALIZING", "UPDATED_NEED_REBOOT"] missing_stages = [s for s in stages if s not in log] # 检查错误码 errors = re.findall(r"ERR.*?\(error code: (\d+)\)", log) return { "is_complete": len(missing_stages) == 0, "error_codes": errors, "has_forced_reboot": "Forcing reboot" in log } ``` #### 3. **失败场景处理** | 失败类型 | 检测方法 | 解决方案 | |-------------------------|-----------------------------------|------------------------------| | 阶段缺失 | `missing_stages != []` | 检查网络/存储空间[^3] | | 错误码5xx | `error_codes`包含50x | 验证服务器证书/API可用性 | | 强制重启未触发更新 | `has_forced_reboot == False` | 检查reboot调度策略 | --- ### **三、增强日志完整性** #### 1. **日志持久化配置** ```diff # 修改/etc/init/update-engine.conf start on started system-services stop on stopping system-services respawn -exec /usr/sbin/update_engine +exec /usr/sbin/update_engine \ + --log_file=/persist/update_engine.log \ # 持久化存储 + --log_level=INFO ``` #### 2. **多阶段日志关联** ```bash # 使用操作ID串联跨重启日志 $ grep "update_check_response: {" /persist/update_engine.log | jq .responses[].operation_id > "a1b2c3d4-1234-5678-90ef" ``` --- ### **四、测试流程设计** ```mermaid graph LR A[触发更新] --> B[监控状态机] B --> C{是否到达NEED_REBOOT?} C -- 是 --> D[强制重启设备] C -- 否 --> E[检查错误日志] D --> F[验证启动后版本号] F --> G{版本匹配?} G -- 是 --> H[测试通过] G -- 否 --> E ``` --- ###
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值