<think>We are going to write a C++ program that meets the specifications above.
Steps:
1. We have to handle the command-line arguments.
2. The program must output the student details when no arguments are given (argc==1).
3. For two arguments: perform addition and output the result.
4. For three arguments: check the third argument for operation code and perform the corresponding operation.
5. For any other number of arguments (less than 2 or more than 3), output 'P'.
Additionally, we must implement error handling as per the functional requirements.
Error handling precedence (as per E9):
P -> incorrect number of arguments (argc != 3 and argc != 4? Actually: no arguments: argc==1 -> student details, 2 arguments: addition, 3 arguments: operation, otherwise: P)
Actually:
argc==1: student details
argc==3: two numbers -> addition
argc==4: three arguments (two numbers and one operation code) -> operation
Otherwise: output 'P'
But note: the program name is argv[0], so:
argc=1: only program name -> student details
argc=2: program name and one argument -> then we have two arguments? Wait, no:
Actually, the command line:
lab1.exe 10 2 -> argc=3 (argv[0]=lab1.exe, argv[1]="10", argv[2]="2")
lab1.exe 10 2 s -> argc=4
So:
argc==1: output student details.
argc==3: two numbers -> addition.
argc==4: three numbers? Actually, the third argument is the operation code (string of length 1?).
However, the specification says:
M4: less than TWO (meaning less than 2 numbers? But note: the program name is one, so if argc<3 -> less than two numbers?
Actually:
argc=1 -> no numbers -> output student details? But M1 says no command line arguments -> student details.
But M4 says: less than two OR more than three -> output 'P'
So let's clarify:
No command line arguments: argc=1 -> output student details (M1).
Two command line arguments: meaning two numbers? Actually, the program is called with two numbers: that would be argc=3 (because program name is one).
Three command line arguments: meaning three numbers? Actually, that would be argc=4.
Therefore:
argc=1 -> student details (M1)
argc=3 -> two numbers -> addition (M2)
argc=4 -> three arguments (the third being the operation code) -> operation (M3, E1)
Otherwise (argc=2, or argc>=5) -> output 'P' (M4)
But note: the specification says "less than TWO" (meaning less than two numbers) -> that would be argc=1 (which is already handled) and argc=2 (which is one number) -> then we output 'P'.
Also, more than three numbers (argc>=5) -> output 'P'.
So the structure:
if (argc == 1) -> output student details and return 0.
Then check the number of arguments:
if (argc == 3) -> two numbers: do addition (if both numbers are valid) else output error.
if (argc == 4) -> three arguments: two numbers and one operation code: do the operation (if valid) else output error.
else -> output 'P' and return 0.
However, note the error precedence: first check the number of arguments -> if not 1,3,4 then output 'P' and exit.
Steps for error handling:
We have to check the arguments in the following order of errors:
1. Check the number of arguments: if not 1,3,4 -> output 'P' and return.
2. For the two numbers (argv[1] and argv[2]) we must check that they are valid numbers (as per E3) and within the range (E6).
If invalid number -> output 'X' and return.
If out of range -> output 'R' and return.
3. For three arguments (argc==4), check the operation code (argv[3]):
If it is not one of 'a', 's', 'm', 'd', 'p' -> output 'V' and return.
4. Then, for the operation:
For division: check for division by zero -> output 'M'
For exponentiation: check for undefined cases (like base negative and exponent fractional, or 0^0) -> output 'Y'
5. Also, when using pow(), if it returns a domain error or range error (like NaN or infinity) then we output 'Y'. But note: we already checked the range of input?
However, the exponentiation might produce a very large number that is out of range? But the specification says the output is a number?
However, the error handling says: if anything else goes wrong, output 'Y'. So we can check the result of pow() for errors.
How to convert the string to a number?
We can use `strtod` (or `atof` but `atof` doesn't give error indication). We'll use `strtod` because it sets `errno` and we can check for conversion errors.
Steps for converting a string to double:
char *endptr;
double num = strtod(str, &endptr);
if (endptr == str) -> no conversion -> invalid.
if (*endptr != '\0') -> there are extra characters -> invalid? But note: the specification says that numbers like "123abc" are invalid.
However, the specification also says that numbers can have a sign and decimal point and exponent? But the autotester only tests for the basic numbers (E3) and not the intermediate (E4) or advanced (E5).
So we must at least check that the entire string is consumed?
But note: the specification says that numbers like ".3" are valid. So we must accept that.
We'll check:
- The string must be entirely consumed (except for trailing spaces? but the command-line arguments don't have spaces).
- Actually, the string is exactly the argument. So we must check that the entire string is converted.
So:
double num1 = strtod(argv[1], &endptr1);
if (*endptr1 != '\0') -> invalid -> output 'X'
Also, we must check for overflow?
If errno == ERANGE -> then the number is too big or too small -> output 'R'
But note: we have a range requirement: between -65536 and 65536. So we must check the absolute value of the number?
If the number is outside [-65536, 65536] -> output 'R'
However, note: the exponentiation might produce a result that is out of range? But the specification says that the input numbers must be in that range. The result of the operation can be any value?
The specification does not restrict the result, only the inputs.
So for the inputs: we check the range.
Steps for each number (argv[1] and argv[2]):
a. Reset errno to 0 before conversion.
b. Use strtod to convert.
c. Check if the entire string was consumed? (if the endptr points to the end of the string, i.e., '\0')
d. If not, output 'X' and return.
e. If the conversion sets errno to ERANGE, then the number is too big to represent? But note: the range we are required is [-65536, 65536].
However, a number like 1e300 would be converted to infinity? and then we can check the value?
f. After conversion, check if the number is in the range [MINRANGE, MAXRANGE] (inclusive). If not, output 'R' and return.
But note: what if the string is "inf" or "nan"? Then strtod will return infinity or NaN?
The specification says: invalid numbers -> output 'X'. So we must check that the conversion produces a finite number?
We can check with isinf and isnan?
Actually, the specification says:
"Valid numbers are all numbers that the average Engineering graduate in Australia would consider valid."
So we must check:
- The entire string is consumed? (so no extra characters)
- The number is finite? (not inf or nan)
Therefore, after conversion, we can check:
if (isinf(num) || isnan(num)) -> invalid? But note: if the input is "inf", then that is not a valid number? So we output 'X'.
However, the specification E3 does not list "inf" as valid. So we output 'X' for any non-finite number?
Also, note: the input might be a string that starts with digits and then has non-digit? Then we output 'X'.
So the steps for each number:
errno = 0;
char *endptr;
double num = strtod(str, &endptr);
if (endptr == str) { // no digits found
output 'X' and return.
}
if (*endptr != '\0') { // there are extra characters
output 'X' and return.
}
if (errno == ERANGE) {
// This means the number is too big or too small to represent as double? But note: we are going to check the range below anyway.
// However, the specification says: if the number is out of [-65536,65536] we output 'R'. But what if the number is 1e300?
// We can check: if the absolute value is greater than MAXRANGE? -> then output 'R'. But note: if the number is too big to represent, it becomes inf -> then we check isinf -> then we output 'X'?
// Actually, if the number is too big, strtod sets errno to ERANGE and returns HUGE_VAL (which is inf). So then we have:
// isinf(num) -> true -> then we output 'X'? But wait: the specification says that the number must be in the range. So we output 'R' for out of range?
// But note: the precedence: first we check for invalid number (X) then range (R).
// However, if the number is too big to be represented as a double, then it is not a valid number? Or is it?
// The specification says: numbers that are too big (like 1e300) are out of range -> output 'R'.
// But the autotester will only test numbers that are in the range?
// Actually, the specification says: "Input number range checking: All input numbers must be between (and including) +2^16 (65536) or -2^16 (-65536)."
// So if the number is outside that range, we output 'R'. However, if the number is so big that it becomes inf, then it is not a finite number?
// We must output 'R' for any number that is outside the range? But note: the range check is after the valid number check.
}
Actually, we can do:
Step 1: Check entire string is consumed -> if not, output 'X'
Step 2: Check if the number is finite (using isfinite) -> if not, output 'X'?
But note: if the number is too big and becomes inf, then it is not finite -> then we output 'X'?
However, the specification says that numbers that are too big are out of range -> output 'R'.
How to resolve?
According to the precedence:
First: invalid number (X) -> if the string is not entirely consumed, then output 'X'
Then: if the number is finite? -> if not, then it is not a valid number? But the specification does not explicitly say that non-finite is invalid?
However, the specification says: "if the first two arguments are not valid decimal numbers, the output shall be 'X'"
We can interpret:
- A number that is too big to represent (so becomes inf) is not a valid decimal number? -> output 'X'
- But the specification also has a separate error for out of range: 'R'.
How about:
We check the entire string is consumed -> if not, output 'X'
Then, if the number is not finite (isinf or isnan) -> output 'X'?
Then, if the number is finite but outside the range [MINRANGE, MAXRANGE] -> output 'R'
However, note: a number that is 70000 is finite and within the representable range of double, but it is outside the allowed input range? -> output 'R'
So the steps:
for each of the two numbers:
char *endptr;
errno = 0;
double num = strtod(argv[i], &endptr);
// Check if we consumed the entire string?
if (*endptr != '\0') {
cout << 'X' << endl;
return 0;
}
// Check if conversion failed? (like no digits) -> endptr==argv[i] is already covered by above? because if no digits, then endptr==argv[i] and *endptr != '\0' (unless the string is empty) -> but the argument is not empty?
// Actually, if the string is empty, then argv[i] is an empty string -> then endptr==argv[i] and *endptr=='\0' -> then we would not get *endptr!='\0'. So we must also check if endptr==argv[i]?
Actually, we can do:
if (endptr == argv[i]) {
// no conversion
cout << 'X' << endl;
return 0;
}
// Check for ERANGE? But note: if the number is too big, we get inf and errno=ERANGE.
if (errno == ERANGE) {
// Now, the number might be too big or too small?
// But the specification says: if the number is out of the range [-65536,65536] we output 'R'.
// However, this error is set when the number is too big to represent in double? which is a different kind of out-of-range?
// We are required to output 'X' for invalid numbers? But the specification says: non-finite numbers are invalid?
// Actually, if we get inf or nan, we can check:
if (isinf(num) || isnan(num)) {
// This is an invalid number? because it's not a real finite number?
cout << 'X' << endl;
return 0;
}
// But note: strtod for a number that is too small (subnormal) might set errno to ERANGE? but then the number is finite?
// However, the specification says: we must check the range [-65536,65536]. So we can proceed to check the value?
// Actually, we can ignore the ERANGE if the number is finite? and then check the range?
}
// Now, check if the number is finite?
if (!isfinite(num)) {
cout << 'X' << endl;
return 0;
}
// Now, check the range:
if (num < MINRANGE || num > MAXRANGE) {
cout << 'R' << endl;
return 0;
}
However, note: the specification says that the input numbers must be in the range. So if the number is 70000 (which is >65536) we output 'R'.
But what about a number that is 1e300?
When we convert with strtod, we get inf -> then we check isinf -> which is true -> then we output 'X'.
But the specification says: if the number is too big (like 1e300) we should output 'R'?
Actually, the specification says: "Input number range checking: All input numbers must be between (and including) +2^16 (65536) or -2^16 (-65536)."
So 1e300 is out of that range? but it is also not representable?
How does the autotester test?
The autotester will only test numbers that are in the range? for the input?
But the specification says:
E7.2: "Range check: ... input for valid numbers will only be tested to the maximum 9.9e99 (Note: 9.9e99 is out of range and your program should output 'R')"
So we must output 'R' for 9.9e99?
But 9.9e99 is a finite number? because it is within the range of double? (double can represent up to about 1e308).
Then we would output 'R' because 9.9e99 > 65536.
Therefore, we don't need to worry about the conversion to double producing inf for numbers that are too big? because the autotester will only test numbers that are <= 9.9e99? and 9.9e99 is finite?
So the steps for each number:
Step 1: Convert the string to double using strtod.
Step 2: Check that the entire string was consumed? (if not, output 'X')
Step 3: Check that the number is finite? (if not, output 'X')
Step 4: Check that the number is in the range [-65536, 65536]? (if not, output 'R')
But note: what if the string is "0.0"? -> that's within the range?
Now, for the operation:
For two arguments (argc=3): we do addition.
For three arguments (argc=4): we check the operation code:
if (argv[3] is a string of length 1) and the character is one of 'a','s','m','d','p'
Otherwise, output 'V'
Then, for each operation:
Addition: num1 + num2
Subtraction: num1 - num2
Multiplication: num1 * num2
Division:
if (num2 == 0) -> output 'M'
else: num1 / num2
Exponentiation:
We have to check for undefined cases:
- If base is negative and the exponent is not an integer? -> but note: the exponent can be fractional?
However, the specification says: if the exponent is between -1 and 1 (excluding -1 and 1) and the base is negative, then it's undefined?
Actually, the specification says: "if the base is negative you can't accept an exponent between (but not including) -1 and 1"
- Also, 0^0 is undefined.
So:
if (num1 == 0 && num2 == 0) -> undefined, output 'Y'
if (num1 < 0) {
// Check if the exponent is in (-1,1) and not zero?
// But note: exponent can be fractional?
// We can check: if the exponent is an integer? then it's defined?
// How to check if the exponent is an integer?
// We can do: if (fabs(num2 - round(num2)) < 1e-9) then it's an integer?
// But note: the exponent might be fractional? and the base negative -> then pow returns NaN?
}
However, the specification says: if the result does not produce a real number -> output 'Y'.
We can compute the result with pow() and then check if the result is NaN?
But note: the specification says: "if there is a domain error or undefined subset of values" -> output 'Y'.
How to check for domain error in pow?
We can set errno=0 before pow, and then check errno after?
Steps:
errno = 0;
double result = pow(num1, num2);
if (errno == EDOM) {
// domain error
cout << 'Y' << endl;
return 0;
}
if (errno == ERANGE) {
// range error? but the result might be too big? -> then we output the number?
// But note: the specification says: if the result is not a real number -> output 'Y'.
// However, range error doesn't mean it's not real? It might be infinity? which is a real number?
// But the specification says: undefined error -> output 'Y'.
// Actually, the specification says: "ANYTHING ELSE THAT CAN GO WRONG" -> output 'Y'.
// So we output 'Y' for any error from pow?
}
Actually, we can check:
if (isnan(result)) {
// then output 'Y'
}
if (isinf(result)) {
// but the specification doesn't say that we have to output an error for overflow?
// because the result of the operation might be very large? but the specification says to output the number?
// However, the specification also says: if the operation produces an undefined result -> output 'Y'.
// But overflow is defined? It's just too big?
// The specification says: "MURPHY'S LAW" -> anything else that goes wrong?
// But note: the specification says: "if there is a domain error or undefined subset of values" -> output 'Y'.
// So overflow? we should output the number?
}
How about:
We check for the specific cases that the specification mentions:
- base negative and exponent in (-1,1) (excluding -1 and 1) -> then output 'Y'
- 0^0 -> output 'Y'
Then, for other cases, we compute with pow and then check if the result is NaN? -> then output 'Y'
But note: the specification says: "Hint: Consider using the pow() function" and then says to output 'Y' for domain errors.
So we can do:
if (num1 < 0) {
if (num2 > -1.0 && num2 < 1.0 && num2 != 0.0) {
cout << 'Y' << endl;
return 0;
}
}
if (num1 == 0 && num2 == 0) {
cout << 'Y' << endl;
return 0;
}
double result = pow(num1, num2);
if (isnan(result)) {
cout << 'Y' << endl;
return 0;
}
Then, if we passed these checks, output the result.
However, note: what if the exponent is negative? and the base is negative? and the exponent is an integer? -> then it's defined?
Example: (-2)^(-3) = -0.125 -> defined.
But our check:
if (base negative and exponent in (-1,1) and not zero) -> we output 'Y'.
But what if the exponent is 0.5? -> then we output 'Y'.
What if the exponent is 0.5 and the base is negative? -> that is a complex number -> then pow returns NaN? -> then we also output 'Y'.
So we can rely on the NaN check?
But the specification says: "if the base is negative you can't accept and exponent between (but not including) -1 and 1".
So we must catch that case and output 'Y'.
Therefore, we do:
if (num1 < 0) {
if (num2 > -1.0 && num2 < 1.0 && num2 != 0.0) {
cout << 'Y' << endl;
return 0;
}
}
if (num1 == 0.0 && num2 == 0.0) {
cout << 'Y' << endl;
return 0;
}
double result = pow(num1, num2);
if (isnan(result)) {
cout << 'Y' << endl;
return 0;
}
Then, if we get here, we output the result.
But note: what if the exponent is 0?
Then any base (except 0) -> result=1.
And if base=0 and exponent=0, we already caught.
Also, note: what if the base is negative and the exponent is an integer?
Then we don't output 'Y', and pow should work?
However, what if the exponent is a very large integer? Then the pow function might return inf? -> then we output the result?
The specification doesn't restrict the result, only the inputs.
So we output the result.
Formatting the output:
We must output the result as a number. But note: the specification says: "a numerical number" and then a new line.
We can use:
cout << result << endl;
But note: if the result is an integer, should we output without decimal?
The examples:
Example1: 10+2 -> 12 (integer)
Example2: 10-2 -> 8 (integer)
Example3: 10/2 -> 5 (integer)
However, the inputs can be floating point.
The specification does not specify the format. But the autotester will compare the output as a string?
We can output in fixed or scientific?
How about: we output the number as it is?
But note: if the result is an integer, we don't want to output decimal places?
However, the autotester might be expecting 12.0 for a floating point operation?
Actually, the examples output integers without decimal.
How to achieve?
We can check if the result is integer?
But note: the operations might produce fractional results?
The specification does not specify the format.
We can use:
if (result == static_cast<int>(result)) {
cout << static_cast<int>(result) << endl;
} else {
cout << result << endl;
}
But caution: the result might be very large? and we don't want to cast to int?
Alternatively, we can use formatting with `std::fixed` and `std::setprecision`, but we are not allowed to include <iomanip>?
We are only allowed the specified includes.
How about:
cout << result << endl;
This will output in the default format. For integers, it will output without decimal?
Example:
double a = 12.0;
cout << a << endl; // outputs "12"
But for 12.1, it outputs "12.1"
So that's acceptable.
However, what if the result is an integer but very large? then it might output in scientific?
But the inputs are limited to [-65536,65536]. The exponentiation:
base max 65536, exponent max 65536 -> 65536^65536 is a huge number -> which will be output in scientific notation?
The specification doesn't specify the format.
We'll output the number as the default double format.
But note: the autotester will compare the string?
We must be cautious: the autotester might expect an integer for integer results?
However, the examples are integers.
Let's do:
For integer results, we output without decimal?
How? We can use:
if (floor(result) == result) {
cout << static_cast<long long>(result) << endl;
} else {
cout << result << endl;
}
But note: the number might be very large? and we cannot cast to long long?
Alternatively, we can use:
if (abs(result) < 1e15 && floor(result)==result) {
// then output as integer
cout << static_cast<long long>(result) << endl;
} else {
cout << result << endl;
}
But the specification does not require this.
Actually, the specification says: "a numerical number" and the examples are integers.
We'll output the number as the default double.
Why? because the autotester will be able to parse both integer and floating point?
But note: the autotester is comparing strings.
How about: we output with `std::defaultfloat`? which is the default.
So we do:
cout << result << endl;
This should work.
Implementation:
Steps:
if (argc == 1) {
output student string
return 0;
}
if (argc != 3 && argc != 4) {
cout << 'P' << endl;
return 0;
}
// Now, we have two numbers: argv[1] and argv[2] -> convert and check errors.
double num1, num2;
// Function to convert a string to double and check errors:
auto convertArg = [](const char* str) -> double {
char *endptr;
errno = 0; // reset errno
double num = strtod(str, &endptr);
// Check if we consumed the entire string?
if (endptr == str) { // no digit found
return NAN; // we'll use NAN to indicate conversion failure (X)
}
if (*endptr != '\0') { // extra characters
return NAN;
}
// Check for ERANGE?
// But note: if the number is too big and becomes inf, then we have isinf(num) -> true -> then we return NAN?
// But the specification says: non-finite numbers are invalid?
if (isinf(num) || isnan(num)) {
return NAN;
}
// Now, check the range:
if (num < MINRANGE || num > MAXRANGE) {
// We return a special value? but we have to output 'R' immediately and exit?
// How to communicate the error?
// We cannot because we are inside a function?
// Alternatively, we do the conversion and error checking in the main without a function?
// Or we can return a struct that includes the error code?
}
This is getting complex. We'll do the conversion and error checking without a helper function?
We'll do:
// Convert the first argument
char *endptr1;
errno = 0;
double num1 = strtod(argv[1], &endptr1);
if (endptr1 == argv[1] || *endptr1 != '\0') {
cout << 'X' << endl;
return 0;
}
if (isinf(num1) || isnan(num1)) {
cout << 'X' << endl;
return 0;
}
if (num1 < MINRANGE || num1 > MAXRANGE) {
cout << 'R' << endl;
return 0;
}
// Similarly for the second argument
char *endptr2;
errno = 0;
double num2 = strtod(argv[2], &endptr2);
if (endptr2 == argv[2] || *endptr2 != '\0') {
cout << 'X' << endl;
return 0;
}
if (isinf(num2) || isnan(num2)) {
cout << 'X' << endl;
return 0;
}
if (num2 < MINRANGE || num2 > MAXRANGE) {
cout << 'R' << endl;
return 0;
}
Now, if we have two arguments (argc=3), then we do addition:
double result = num1 + num2;
cout << result << endl;
If we have three arguments (argc=4), then we check the third argument:
char* op = argv[3];
if (strlen(op) != 1) { // must be a single character
cout << 'V' << endl;
return 0;
}
char op_char = op[0];
if (op_char == 'a') {
result = num1 + num2;
} else if (op_char == 's') {
result = num1 - num2;
} else if (op_char == 'm') {
result = num1 * num2;
} else if (op_char == 'd') {
if (num2 == 0) {
cout << 'M' << endl;
return 0;
}
result = num1 / num2;
} else if (op_char == 'p') {
// Check for undefined cases:
if (num1 < 0) {
if (num2 > -1.0 && num2 < 1.0 && num2 != 0.0) {
cout << 'Y' << endl;
return 0;
}
}
if (num1 == 0 && num2 == 0) {
cout << 'Y' << endl;
return 0;
}
errno = 0;
double result_pow = pow(num1, num2);
if (isnan(result_pow)) {
cout << 'Y' << endl;
return 0;
}
result = result_pow;
} else {
cout << 'V' << endl;
return 0;
}
// Then output the result
cout << result << endl;
But note: what if the exponentiation produces a finite number? then we output it.
However, what if the exponentiation produces an inf?
Then we output the inf? which will be printed as "inf" or "1.#INF", etc?
The specification does not say we have to check the result of the operation for range?
Only the inputs are checked for range.
But the specification says: "ANYTHING ELSE THAT CAN GO WRONG" -> output 'Y'.
So if the result is inf, is that an error?
Actually, the specification does not say that the result must be in a range.
So we output the number?
Example: 2^100000 -> inf?
But the autotester might not test such large exponents?
We'll output the number as is.
However, note: the specification says: "if the result does not produce a real number" -> output 'Y'.
But inf is a real number? (it represents an infinite real number).
So we don't output 'Y' for inf.
But the specification says: "MURPHY'S LAW" -> anything else that goes wrong?
And the example of pow() returning an error? we already handled the domain error and NaN.
So we output the result.
However, what if the exponentiation produces a very small number (subnormal) that rounds to zero?
Then we output 0?
We'll output the result as is.
Note: the specification says: the program must output the result and then a newline.
We must be cautious: the output must be exactly the number and nothing else.
Let's code accordingly.
But note: the division by zero is handled only for the division operation?
What if we do exponentiation: 0 to a negative exponent? -> that would be 1/(0^positive) -> division by zero?
Then pow(0, -2) would return inf?
Then we output inf?
But the specification says: for division by zero (only in the division operation) we output 'M'.
For exponentiation, we don't check for division by zero?
However, the exponentiation operation might involve division by zero? -> then we output the inf?
But the specification does not require an error for that?
So we output the inf?
But note: the specification says: "ANYTHING ELSE THAT CAN GO WRONG" -> output 'Y'.
And the example of pow() returning an error? we already handled the domain error and NaN.
So we don't output an error for inf?
Therefore, we do not check the result of pow for inf?
However, the specification says: for division by zero in the division operation -> output 'M'.
For exponentiation, we only output 'Y' for the specific cases (negative base with fractional exponent in (-1,1) and 0^0) and for NaN?
So we are consistent.
Now, note: the operations for addition, subtraction, multiplication, division, and exponentiation might produce a NaN?
For example: 0.0/0.0 -> NaN? but we already check for division by zero?
But what if we have 0.0/0.0?
In division: if num2==0, we output 'M'. But note: 0.0/0.0 -> num2 is 0? -> then we output 'M'.
But that's not correct: 0.0/0.0 is NaN, but we are not checking if num1 is zero?
Actually, we check: if (num2 == 0) -> then output 'M'.
But 0.0/0.0 has num2==0? -> then we output 'M'.
However, the specification says: division by zero -> output 'M'.
It doesn't matter if the numerator is zero?
So we output 'M' for any division by zero.
But what about: 0.0/0.0 -> that's 0/0 -> undefined?
The specification doesn't require a separate error for that?
So we treat it as division by zero?
Similarly, for exponentiation: 0.0 to a negative exponent: we get inf? -> then we output inf?
We'll code accordingly.
Let's write the code accordingly.
Note: we must include <cmath> for pow, isinf, isnan, etc. (already included as <math.h>)
We'll also use <cctype> for tolower? but we don't need to because the operation is case sensitive?
The specification says: the operation codes are case sensitive?
So 'a' is valid, 'A' is not?
Therefore, we compare exactly.
We'll use:
#include <cmath>
#include <cstdlib>
#include <iostream>
#include <cstring> // for strlen
But note: the includes are already provided.
We'll write the code.
Important: the program must return 0 in all cases.
We'll structure the main:
if (argc==1) ...
if (argc != 3 && argc !=4) ...
convert num1 and check errors (X, R) -> if error, output and return.
convert num2 and check errors (X, R) -> if error, output and return.
if (argc==3) {
result = num1+num2;
cout << result << endl;
return 0;
}
if (argc==4) {
check op:
if not single char -> V
if not in {'a','s','m','d','p'} -> V
then do the operation, with error checks for division (M) and exponentiation (Y) and then output the result.
}
Let's code accordingly.
Note: we must be cautious with floating point comparisons: use tolerance?
For checking zero:
if (num2 == 0.0) -> but what if num2 is very small?
The specification says: division by zero -> output 'M'.
So we must check for exact zero?
However, what if num2 is 0.0000000001? -> then we don't output 'M'.
So we do:
if (num2 == 0.0) // this is exact zero.
But note: if the user inputs "0.0000000000000000000001", then the conversion might be 1e-22? which is not zero?
So we are safe.
Similarly, for the exponentiation:
if (num1 == 0.0 && num2 == 0.0) -> we check exact zero?
But what if num1 is very close to zero? and num2 is very close to zero?
Then we don't output 'Y'.
So we do exact comparison?
The specification says: 0^0 is undefined -> so we only output 'Y' for exact zero?
We'll do exact comparisons for zero?
But note: floating point representation: sometimes 0.0 might be represented as -0.0?
We can use:
if (num1 == 0.0 && num2 == 0.0) -> but note: 0.0 and -0.0 are both zero?
How to check for zero?
if (num1 == 0.0) -> this is true for both 0.0 and -0.0?
So we are safe.
However, what if num1 is negative zero?
Then the condition: num1 < 0 -> false? because -0.0 is not less than 0?
So for base negative zero, we don't check the exponent?
But note: pow(-0.0, exponent) might be defined for some exponents?
We'll rely on the pow function?
And if the exponent is in (-1,1) and not zero, then we output 'Y'?
But note: the base is negative? -> but -0.0 is not negative?
So we don't output 'Y' for base=-0.0 and exponent=0.5?
Then we compute pow(-0.0, 0.5) -> which is 0.0?
So we are safe.
We'll code accordingly.
Let's code.</think>根据给定的要求，我将编写一个C++程序来实现基本的算术运算功能，并满足所有错误处理要求。以下是完整的解决方案：
```cpp
#include <iostream>
#include <cstdlib>
#include <cmath>
#include <cstring>
#include <cerrno>
using namespace std;
const double MAXRANGE = 65536.0; // 2^16
const double MINRANGE = -65536.0;
// 检查字符串是否为有效数字
bool isValidNumber(const char* str, double& num) {
char* endptr;
errno = 0;
num = strtod(str, &endptr);
// 检查是否整个字符串都被转换
if (endptr == str || *endptr != '\0') {
return false;
}
// 检查转换错误（如溢出）
if (errno == ERANGE || isinf(num) || isnan(num)) {
return false;
}
// 检查数字范围
if (num < MINRANGE || num > MAXRANGE) {
return false;
}
return true;
}
int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
// 无参数时输出学生信息
if (argc == 1) {
cout << "3939723,s3939723@student.rmit.edu.au,Yang_Yang" << endl;
return 0;
}
// 参数数量检查
if (argc != 3 && argc != 4) {
cout << 'P' << endl;
return 0;
}
double num1, num2;
// 转换并验证第一个数字
if (!isValidNumber(argv[1], num1)) {
// 检查是格式错误还是范围错误
char* endptr;
strtod(argv[1], &endptr);
if (endptr == argv[1] || *endptr != '\0' || errno == ERANGE || isinf(num1) || isnan(num1)) {
cout << 'X' << endl;
} else {
cout << 'R' << endl;
}
return 0;
}
// 转换并验证第二个数字
if (!isValidNumber(argv[2], num2)) {
char* endptr;
strtod(argv[2], &endptr);
if (endptr == argv[2] || *endptr != '\0' || errno == ERANGE || isinf(num2) || isnan(num2)) {
cout << 'X' << endl;
} else {
cout << 'R' << endl;
}
return 0;
}
// 两个参数时执行加法
if (argc == 3) {
cout << num1 + num2 << endl;
return 0;
}
// 三个参数时检查操作符
char* op = argv[3];
if (strlen(op) != 1) {
cout << 'V' << endl;
return 0;
}
double result;
switch (op[0]) {
case 'a': // 加法
result = num1 + num2;
break;
case 's': // 减法
result = num1 - num2;
break;
case 'm': // 乘法
result = num1 * num2;
break;
case 'd': // 除法
if (num2 == 0.0) {
cout << 'M' << endl;
return 0;
}
result = num1 / num2;
break;
case 'p': // 幂运算
// 处理0^0未定义情况
if (num1 == 0.0 && num2 == 0.0) {
cout << 'Y' << endl;
return 0;
}
// 处理负底数和小数指数
if (num1 < 0.0) {
if (num2 > -1.0 && num2 < 1.0 && num2 != 0.0) {
cout << 'Y' << endl;
return 0;
}
}
result = pow(num1, num2);
if (isnan(result) || isinf(result)) {
cout << 'Y' << endl;
return 0;
}
break;
default: // 无效操作符
cout << 'V' << endl;
return 0;
}
// 输出结果
cout << result << endl;
return 0;
}
```
### 代码解释
1. **头文件包含**：
- `<iostream>`：用于输入输出
- `<cstdlib>`：包含`strtod`函数
- `<cmath>`：包含数学函数（`pow`, `isinf`, `isnan`）
- `<cstring>`：包含`strlen`函数
- `<cerrno>`：包含错误处理宏
2. **常量定义**：
- `MAXRANGE`和`MINRANGE`：定义输入数字的有效范围（-65536到65536）
3. **辅助函数`isValidNumber`**：
- 使用`strtod`转换字符串为double
- 检查整个字符串是否被成功转换
- 检查转换错误（溢出、无穷大、NaN）
- 检查数字是否在有效范围内
4. **主函数逻辑**：
- **无参数**：输出学生信息（学号、邮箱、姓名）
- **参数数量检查**：不是2或3个参数时输出'P'
- **数字转换验证**：
- 使用`isValidNumber`检查每个数字
- 区分格式错误('X')和范围错误('R')
- **两个参数**：执行加法并输出结果
- **三个参数**：
- 检查操作符长度（必须是单个字符）
- 根据操作符执行相应运算
- 特殊处理：
- 除法检查除零错误('M')
- 幂运算检查未定义情况('Y')
- **输出结果**：使用cout直接输出数值
### 错误处理顺序
1. 参数数量错误（'P'）
2. 数字格式错误（'X'）
3. 数字范围错误（'R'）
4. 无效操作符（'V'）
5. 除零错误（'M'）
6. 幂运算未定义（'Y'）
### 测试用例
1. 无参数：`lab1.exe` → 输出学生信息
2. 两个参数：`lab1.exe 10 2` → 输出12
3. 三个参数加法：`lab1.exe 10 2 a` → 输出12
4. 三个参数减法：`lab1.exe 10 2 s` → 输出8
5. 无效参数数量：`lab1.exe 10` → 输出'P'
6. 无效数字：`lab1.exe abc 2` → 输出'X'
7. 超出范围：`lab1.exe 70000 2` → 输出'R'
8. 无效操作符：`lab1.exe 10 2 x` → 输出'V'
9. 除零：`lab1.exe 10 0 d` → 输出'M'
10. 未定义幂：`lab1.exe 0 0 p` → 输出'Y'
### 注意事项
1. 操作符区分大小写（'a'有效，'A'无效）
2. 输入数字可以是整数或浮点数
3. 严格遵循错误处理优先级
4. 所有输出以换行符结束
5. 程序始终返回0
本文介绍了一个关于Android开发中ActionBar标题显示的问题及解决方案。作者发现将requestWindowFeature(Window.FEATURE_NO_TITLE)放在setContentView之后会导致标题栏不被隐藏，通过调整这两行代码的顺序解决了该问题。
扫一扫
4971
被折叠的 条评论
为什么被折叠?
到【灌水乐园】发言
