有公司在画控制图时,对进度偏差率画了XMR控制图。原始数据如下:
|
度量日期
|
开发进度偏差率
|
|
05-14
|
-2%
|
|
05-19
|
0%
|
|
05-21
|
-1%
|
|
05-22
|
-2%
|
|
05-23
|
-2%
|
|
05-26
|
-4%
|
|
05-27
|
-5%
|
|
05-28
|
-8%
|
|
05-29
|
-11%
|
|
05-30
|
-12%
|
|
06-02
|
-14%
|
|
06-03
|
-15%
|
|
06-04
|
-21%
|
|
06-05
|
-27%
|
|
06-06
|
-9%
|
|
06-10
|
-9%
|
|
06-11
|
-6%
|
|
06-12
|
-4%
|
|
06-13
|
-4%
|
|
06-16
|
0%
|
|
06-17
|
-5%
|
|
06-18
|
-5%
|
|
06-19
|
-5%
|
|
06-20
|
-7%
|
|
06-23
|
-6%
|
|
06-24
|
-5%
|
|
06-25
|
-4%
|
|
06-26
|
-4%
|
|
06-27
|
-3%
|
|
06-30
|
-2%
|
|
07-01
|
-2%
|
|
07-02
|
-1%
|
|
07-03
|
-1%
|
|
07-04
|
-1%
|
XMR图为:

其实上述对控制图的应用是错误的,因为违背了采样的基本前提,即样本的独立性,前后2个采用点应该是独立的,不是相关的2个点。对于上述的原始数据可以对自相关的分析如下:
|
前一天
|
前一天的进度偏差率
|
后一天
|
后一天的进度偏差率
|
|
05-14
|
-2.00%
|
05-19
|
0.00%
|
|
05-19
|
0.00%
|
05-21
|
-0.50%
|
|
05-21
|
-0.50%
|
05-22
|
-1.90%
|
|
05-22
|
-1.90%
|
05-23
|
-2.40%
|
|
05-23
|
-2.40%
|
05-26
|
-3.50%
|
|
05-26
|
-3.50%
|
05-27
|
-4.90%
|
|
05-27
|
-4.90%
|
05-28
|
-8.10%
|
|
05-28
|
-8.10%
|
05-29
|
-11.20%
|
|
05-29
|
-11.20%
|
05-30
|
-11.80%
|
|
05-30
|
-11.80%
|
06-02
|
-13.60%
|
|
06-02
|
-13.60%
|
06-03
|
-15.00%
|
|
06-03
|
-15.00%
|
06-04
|
-21.00%
|
|
06-04
|
-21.00%
|
06-05
|
-27.00%
|
|
06-05
|
-27.00%
|
06-06
|
-9.00%
|
|
06-06
|
-9.00%
|
06-10
|
-9.00%
|
|
06-10
|
-9.00%
|
06-11
|
-6.00%
|
|
06-11
|
-6.00%
|
06-12
|
-4.00%
|
|
06-12
|
-4.00%
|
06-13
|
-4.00%
|
|
06-13
|
-4.00%
|
06-16
|
-0.20%
|
|
06-16
|
-0.20%
|
06-17
|
-5.00%
|
|
06-17
|
-5.00%
|
06-18
|
-5.00%
|
|
06-18
|
-5.00%
|
06-19
|
-4.90%
|
|
06-19
|
-4.90%
|
06-20
|
-6.60%
|
|
06-20
|
-6.60%
|
06-23
|
-5.80%
|
|
06-23
|
-5.80%
|
06-24
|
-4.70%
|
|
06-24
|
-4.70%
|
06-25
|
-3.80%
|
|
06-25
|
-3.80%
|
06-26
|
-4.20%
|
|
06-26
|
-4.20%
|
06-27
|
-3.10%
|
|
06-27
|
-3.10%
|
06-30
|
-2.30%
|
|
06-30
|
-2.30%
|
07-01
|
-1.50%
|
|
07-01
|
-1.50%
|
07-02
|
-1.20%
|
|
07-02
|
-1.20%
|
07-03
|
-1.20%
|
|
07-03
|
-1.20%
|
07-04
|
-1.30%
|
对前后2天的进度偏差率散点图为:

显然前后2天的进度偏差率是相关的。
1万+

被折叠的 条评论
为什么被折叠?



