Worse is better" -- Unix哲学之

本文探讨了Unix哲学中的WorseisBetter原则,即简单优于完美。通过介绍Unix早期面对信号处理和系统调用时的选择,展示了该哲学如何应用于实际问题解决中。在遇到信号中断时,Unix选择简单地返回错误(EINTR),而非尝试复杂的恢复策略。

本段文字介绍了Unix哲学之一:Worse is Better,同时本文还解释了为什么Unix阻塞系统调用可能会返回EINTR错误。

Richard P. Gabriel suggests that a key advantage of Unix was that it embodied a design philosophy he termed "Worse is better". In the "Worse is better" design style, simplicity of both the interface and the implementation is more important than any other attribute of the system — including correctness, consistency and completeness. Gabriel argues that this design style has key evolutionary advantages, though he questions the quality of some results.

For example, in the early days UNIX was a monolithic kernel (which means that user processes carried out kernel system calls all on the user stack). If a signal was delivered to a process while it was blocked on a long-term I/O in the kernel, then what should be done? Should the signal be delayed, possibly for a long time (maybe indefinitely) while the I/O completed? The signal handler could not be executed when the process was in kernel mode, with sensitive kernel data on the stack. Should the kernel back-out the system call, and store it, for replay and restart later, assuming that the signal handler completes successfully?

In these cases Ken Thompson and Dennis Ritchie favored simplicity over perfection. The UNIX system would occasionally return early from a system call with an error stating that it had done nothing - the "Interrupted System Call" - an error number 4 (EINTR) in today's systems. Of course the call had been aborted in order to call the signal handler. This could only happen for a handful of long-running system calls, i.e. read(), write(), open(), select(), etc. On the plus side, this made the I/O system many times simpler to design and understand. The vast majority of user programs were never affected because they didn't handle or experience signals other than SIGINT/^C and would die right away if one was raised. For the few other programs - things like shells or text editors that respond to job control keypresses - small wrappers could be added to system calls so as to retry the call right away if this EINTR error was raised. Problem solved, in a simple way.

更过Unix哲学,请看:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unix_philosophy

MATLAB主动噪声和振动控制算法——对较大的次级路径变化具有鲁棒性内容概要:本文主要介绍了一种在MATLAB环境下实现的主动噪声和振动控制算法,该算法针对较大的次级路径变化具有较强的鲁棒性。文中详细阐述了算法的设计原理与实现方法,重点解决了传统控制系统中因次级路径动态变化导致性能下降的问题。通过引入自适应机制和鲁棒控制策略,提升了系统在复杂环境下的稳定性和控制精度,适用于需要高精度噪声与振动抑制的实际工程场景。此外,文档还列举了多个MATLAB仿真实例及相关科研技术服务内容,涵盖信号处理、智能优化、机器学习等多个交叉领域。; 适合人群:具备一定MATLAB编程基础和控制系统理论知识的科研人员及工程技术人员,尤其适合从事噪声与振动控制、信号处理、自动化等相关领域的研究生和工程师。; 使用场景及目标:①应用于汽车、航空航天、精密仪器等对噪声和振动敏感的工业领域;②用于提升现有主动控制系统对参数变化的适应能力;③为相关科研项目提供算法验证与仿真平台支持; 阅读建议:建议读者结合提供的MATLAB代码进行仿真实验,深入理解算法在不同次级路径条件下的响应特性,并可通过调整控制参数进一步探究其鲁棒性边界。同时可参考文档中列出的相关技术案例拓展应用场景。
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值