prepare submission file and send this file to MPII dataset team and get evaluation results from them

人体姿态估计研究多基于MPII dataset,github上只能获取valid上的pck,论文结果多来自test。本文分享单人姿态估计获取MPII test结果的方法,MPII test数据块不公开且限制提交次数,可参考澳大利亚一位博士的github。

prepare submission file and get evaluation results from MPII dataset team

人体姿态估计(human pose estimation)的研究,很多论文都是基于MPII dataset。在github上面只能得到MPII dataset在valid上的pck(percent of correct key-points),valid上的精度一般比test上低1~2%,论文中的结果大都是在test上得到。
所以今天分享一下单人(single-person)的姿态估计如何获取在MPII上test的结果。MPII dataset 的test数据块不公开,而且限制提交的次数,72小时内不能重复提交,同样的方法提交不能超过4次。
这是MPII官网上的规定,也可以参考官网上的方法获取test的结果,反正我是没看懂。
具体的可以参考澳大利亚的一位博士的github,人超级nice。希望可以对你有帮助。

In a messaging or version-controlled system, submitting a form from a previous message may lead to several implications depending on how the system is designed and how the data is managed. When a form is submitted based on data from a prior message, there is a potential for data conflicts, outdated information being reintroduced, or unintended overwrites of more recent changes[^1]. One key consideration is data versioning. If the system maintains a history of changes, the submission might be treated as a new version of the data rather than an overwrite. This allows for traceability and the ability to roll back if necessary. However, if the system does not support versioning, submitting an older form could overwrite current data without any record of the previous state, leading to potential data loss or confusion[^1]. Another important aspect is concurrency control. Systems that enforce concurrency control mechanisms, such as optimistic or pessimistic locking, may prevent the submission of a form based on outdated data. In such cases, the system detects that the data has changed since the form was loaded and prompts the user to reconcile differences before allowing submission. Additionally, in systems that use form templates or schemas, submitting a form from a previous message may result in validation errors if the schema has evolved. For example, fields that were required in the older version may no longer exist, or new mandatory fields may have been added, making the submission incompatible with the current schema. From a user experience perspective, users might not be aware that they are working with outdated data, especially in collaborative environments where multiple users are making changes simultaneously. This could lead to inconsistencies or duplicated effort if not properly managed through notifications or user interface cues. To mitigate these risks, best practices include ensuring data availability and understanding the data model before submission, as well as cleansing and validating data to confirm its accuracy and relevance. In systems with personalization or segmentation capabilities, it is also important to validate input data using tools like Data Explorer to ensure that the data aligns with the intended audience or segment criteria[^1]. ```python # Example of a simple form submission handler in a version-controlled system class FormSubmissionHandler: def __init__(self, current_data_version): self.current_data_version = current_data_version def submit_form(self, submitted_data, submitted_version): if submitted_version < self.current_data_version: print("Warning: Submitting data from a previous version.") # Handle version conflict return "VersionConflict" else: # Process the submission print("Form submitted successfully.") return "Success" ```
评论
成就一亿技术人!
拼手气红包6.0元
还能输入1000个字符
 
红包 添加红包
表情包 插入表情
 条评论被折叠 查看
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值