ABI Compliance Checker 使用教程

ABI Compliance Checker 使用教程

abi-compliance-checkerA tool for checking backward API/ABI compatibility of a C/C++ library项目地址:https://gitcode.com/gh_mirrors/ab/abi-compliance-checker

1. 项目的目录结构及介绍

ABI Compliance Checker 是一个用于检查 C/C++ 库向后兼容性的工具。以下是其基本目录结构:

abi-compliance-checker/
├── bin/
│   └── abi-compliance-checker
├── lib/
│   ├── ABI.pm
│   ├── API.pm
│   └── ...
├── t/
│   ├── test-cases/
│   └── ...
├── Makefile.PL
├── README.md
└── ...
  • bin/:包含可执行文件 abi-compliance-checker
  • lib/:包含工具的核心模块,如 ABI.pmAPI.pm
  • t/:包含测试用例。
  • Makefile.PL:用于生成 Makefile 的 Perl 脚本。
  • README.md:项目的说明文档。

2. 项目的启动文件介绍

项目的启动文件是 bin/abi-compliance-checker。这是一个 Perl 脚本,用于启动 ABI Compliance Checker 工具。以下是启动文件的基本结构:

#!/usr/bin/env perl

use strict;
use warnings;

use FindBin;
use lib "$FindBin::Bin/../lib";

use ABI::ComplianceChecker;

ABI::ComplianceChecker->new->run;
  • #!/usr/bin/env perl:指定使用 Perl 解释器。
  • use strict;use warnings;:启用严格模式和警告。
  • use FindBin;use lib "$FindBin::Bin/../lib";:设置库路径。
  • use ABI::ComplianceChecker;:导入主模块。
  • ABI::ComplianceChecker->new->run;:创建并运行主模块实例。

3. 项目的配置文件介绍

ABI Compliance Checker 的配置主要通过命令行参数进行。以下是一些常用的配置选项:

abi-compliance-checker -lib NAME -old OLD.xml -new NEW.xml
  • -lib NAME:指定库的名称。
  • -old OLD.xml:指定旧版本的 ABI 描述文件。
  • -new NEW.xml:指定新版本的 ABI 描述文件。

此外,还可以通过创建 XML 描述文件来配置库的版本、头文件路径和库路径:

<version>1.0</version>
<headers>/path/to/headers/</headers>
<libs>/path/to/libraries/</libs>
  • <version>:指定库的版本。
  • <headers>:指定头文件路径。
  • <libs>:指定库路径。

以上是 ABI Compliance Checker 的基本使用教程,涵盖了项目的目录结构、启动文件和配置文件的介绍。

abi-compliance-checkerA tool for checking backward API/ABI compatibility of a C/C++ library项目地址:https://gitcode.com/gh_mirrors/ab/abi-compliance-checker

创作声明:本文部分内容由AI辅助生成(AIGC),仅供参考

### DeepSeek ABI Integration and Compatibility #### Understanding ABI Compatibility in the Context of DeepSeek In software development, ensuring Application Binary Interface (ABI) compatibility is crucial when integrating libraries or tools into larger systems. For a platform like DeepSeek that may involve extensive use of external C/C++ libraries, maintaining ABI stability ensures seamless upgrades without breaking existing applications[^1]. DeepSeek can leverage an ABI compliance checker tool to monitor changes within its core components as well as third-party dependencies. This approach helps identify potential issues early during development cycles rather than encountering them after deployment. For instance, suppose there exists a hypothetical scenario where DeepSeek uses `libtinyalsa` for audio processing capabilities. If updates are made to this library leading to extending changes in its ABI, developers would need to address these modifications promptly using scripts provided by Android build environments: ```bash $ANDROID_BUILD_TOP/development/vndk/tools/header-checker/utils/create_reference_dumps.py -l libtinyalsa ``` This command regenerates reference dumps necessary for validating future ABI consistency checks against new versions of `libtinyalsa`. #### Implementing ABI Checks Within Development Pipelines To integrate ABI verification processes effectively within Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment pipelines used by projects such as DeepSeek, consider automating tasks related to running ABICC on every commit or pull request targeting critical branches. Automating these steps reduces human errors while promoting best practices around dependency management. Additionally, incorporating static analysis tools capable of detecting common pitfalls associated with violating established conventions regarding function signatures, data structures alignment requirements, etc., further strengthens overall system robustness over time. #### Best Practices for Maintaining ABI Stability When developing modules intended for inclusion inside platforms similar to DeepSeek, adhering strictly to guidelines concerning public interfaces exposed through headers files becomes paramount. Developers should avoid making unnecessary alterations outside documented APIs unless absolutely required due to functional enhancements or security patches. Furthermore, employing versioned symbols allows consumers of shared objects (.so files under Linux/macOS; .dlls on Windows) to coexist peacefully alongside multiple iterations simultaneously installed across diverse operating systems configurations encountered throughout target user bases. --related questions-- 1. How does one set up automated testing frameworks specifically tailored towards catching ABI regressions? 2. What strategies exist for minimizing disruptions caused by mandatory API deprecations affecting widely adopted open-source packages? 3. Can you provide examples illustrating how symbol versioning works internally within ELF binaries produced via GCC/Clang compilers? 4. Are there any notable differences between handling ABI concerns among various programming languages beyond just C/C++ ecosystems?
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包

打赏作者

叶准鑫Natalie

你的鼓励将是我创作的最大动力

¥1 ¥2 ¥4 ¥6 ¥10 ¥20
扫码支付:¥1
获取中
扫码支付

您的余额不足,请更换扫码支付或充值

打赏作者

实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值