Difference Between Class.ForName() And ClassLoader.LoadClass() Methods In Java

本文对比了Java中Class.forName和ClassLoader.loadClass两种动态加载类的方法。前者为静态方法且加载时初始化静态成员;后者为实例方法,允许指定类加载器并延迟类的初始化。

This is one of the most frequently asked questions in Java interviews. This question describes how deeply you know about class loading, dynamic class loading mechanism and class initialization. Both Class.forName(String className) and ClassLoader.LoadClass(String className) methods try to dynamically load class with given string class name and both methods return java.lang.Class objects for given string class name.

But now question arise that if both methods have same behavior than what is the difference between them? There is one visible difference is that, where Class.forName(String className) method is static method ofjava.lang.Class class, in other hand, ClassLoader.LoadClass(String className) method is instance method (non-static method). Therefore, if you want to use and call ClassLoader.LoadClass(String className)method, you need any java.lang.ClassLoader instance to load any class with this method.

One another difference is ClassLoader used by both methods to load given class. Where Class.forName(String className) method use the same ClassLoader to load the class, which is used by it’s caller. For example, if you have created a class XYZ in which you have used Class.forName(String className) method to load any given class, in this case, Class.forName(String className) method will use same ClassLoader with which XYZ class has loaded. Whereas ClassLoader.LoadClass(String className) method use that ClassLoader on whichClassLoader instance this method is called. If you are concerned about any specific or your own ClassLoader to load any class then you should use ClassLoader.LoadClass(String className) method to load any given class.

Let us discuss one major difference between both methods. The major difference between both methods is class initialization after loading any given class. Class.forName(String className) method load given class dynamically and initialize it statically. It initialize all static fields of this class and it’s super class static fields recursively. Whereas ClassLoader.LoadClass(String className) method load the class dynamically but delay the initialization of given class. Therefore, choice of use from both methods depends on situations, if you know, static initialization of any class is costly, then you could choose delay initialization usingClassLoader.LoadClass(String className) method.

But there is one more method in java.lang.Class class, in which you can specify your own ClassLoader to load any class and delay class initialization as well. There is one method with three parameters in which you can specify your ClassLoader and set Boolean flag, whether you want to initialize that class or not. For example,Class.forName(String className, boolean initialize, ClassLoader loader). This method can be use for more flexibility and customization like initialization and ClassLoader.

I hope now you are bit more clear about differences in both methods which generally look alike. If you know any more differences please share with us.

内容概要:本文介绍了一个基于冠豪猪优化算法(CPO)的无人机三维路径规划项目,利用Python实现了在复杂三维环境中为无人机规划安全、高效、低能耗飞行路径的完整解决方案。项目涵盖空间环境建模、无人机动力学约束、路径编码、多目标代价函数设计以及CPO算法的核心实现。通过体素网格建模、动态障碍物处理、路径平滑技术和多约束融合机制,系统能够在高维、密集障碍环境下快速搜索出满足飞行可行性、安全性与能效最优的路径,并支持在线重规划以适应动态环境变化。文中还提供了关键模块的代码示例,包括环境建模、路径评估和CPO优化流程。; 适合人群:具备一定Python编程基础和优化算法基础知识,从事无人机、智能机器人、路径规划或智能优化算法研究的相关科研人员与工程技术人员,尤其适合研究生及有一定工作经验的研发工程师。; 使用场景及目标:①应用于复杂三维环境下的无人机自主导航与避障;②研究智能优化算法(如CPO)在路径规划中的实际部署与性能优化;③实现多目标(路径最短、能耗最低、安全性最高)耦合条件下的工程化路径求解;④构建可扩展的智能无人系统决策框架。; 阅读建议:建议结合文中模型架构与代码示例进行实践运行,重点关注目标函数设计、CPO算法改进策略与约束处理机制,宜在仿真环境中测试不同场景以深入理解算法行为与系统鲁棒性。
评论
成就一亿技术人!
拼手气红包6.0元
还能输入1000个字符
 
红包 添加红包
表情包 插入表情
 条评论被折叠 查看
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值