1、直接引用
直接引用对基本数据类型与引用数据类型都不会复制一份新的,使用的都是原来的值
package clone;
public class Reference {
public static void main(String[] args){
People3 people=new People3();
people.num=1315;
Student3 stu1=new Student3();
stu1.age=1;
stu1.people3=people;
System.out.println("-----------原对象----------------------");
System.out.println("stu1:"+stu1);
System.out.println("stu1->age:"+stu1.age);
System.out.println("stu1->num:"+stu1.people3);
System.out.println("stu1->pepole3->num:"+stu1.people3.num);
Student3 stu2=(Student3) stu1;
System.out.println("-----------引用出来的对象----------------- ");
System.out.println("stu2:"+stu2);
System.out.println("stu2->age:"+stu2.age);
System.out.println("stu2->num:"+stu2.people3);
System.out.println("stu2->pepole3->num:"+stu2.people3.num);
stu1.age=3;
stu1.people3.num=1327;
System.out.println("-----------修改原对象对引用对象的影响-----------");
System.out.println("stu2:"+stu2);
System.out.println("stu2->age:"+stu2.age);
System.out.println("stu2->num:"+stu2.people3);
System.out.println("stu2->num:"+stu2.people3.num);
}
}
class Student3 implements Cloneable{
public int age;
public People3 people3;
}
class People3{
public int num;
}
输出的结果是这样的:
当改变原对象的基本数据类型与引用数据类型,新对象的基本数据类型与引用数据类型的值都会变,而且可以看到对象的hashcode值都是一样的
2、浅拷贝
浅拷贝会对基本数据类型复制一份新的,对引用数据类型会使用原来的对象的
package clone;
public class ShallowCopy {
public static void main(String[] args){
People people=new People();
people.num=1234;
Student stu1=new Student();
stu1.age=1;
stu1.people=people;
System.out.println("-----------原对象----------------------");
System.out.println("stu1:"+stu1);
System.out.println("stu1->age:"+stu1.age);
System.out.println("stu1->num:"+stu1.people);
System.out.println("stu1->pepole->num:"+stu1.people.num);
try {
System.out.println("-----------浅拷贝出的对象--------------");
Student stu2=(Student) stu1.clone();
System.out.println("stu2:"+stu2);
System.out.println("stu2->age:"+stu2.age);
System.out.println("stu2->num:"+stu2.people);
System.out.println("stu2->pepole->num:"+stu2.people.num);
stu1.age=3;
people.num=2345;
System.out.println("--------修改原对象对浅拷贝出的对象的影响-----------");
System.out.println("stu2:"+stu2);
System.out.println("stu2->age:"+stu2.age);
System.out.println("stu2->num:"+stu2.people);
System.out.println("stu2->pepole->num:"+stu2.people.num);
} catch (CloneNotSupportedException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
class Student implements Cloneable{
public int age;
public People people;
@Override
public Object clone() throws CloneNotSupportedException {
return super.clone();
}
}
class People{
public int num;
}
输出的结果是这样的:
当改变原对象的基本数据类型与引用数据类型,新对象的基本数据类型不变,引用数据类型的值会变,而且可以看到对象的hashcode值是一样的
3、深拷贝
package clone;
public class DeepCopy {
public static void main(String[] args){
People2 people2=new People2();
people2.num=3456;
Student2 stu1=new Student2();
stu1.age=1;
stu1.people2=people2;
System.out.println("-----------原对象----------------------");
System.out.println("stu1:"+stu1);
System.out.println("stu1->age:"+stu1.age);
System.out.println("stu1->num:"+stu1.people2);
System.out.println("stu1->pepole->num:"+stu1.people2.num);
try {
Student2 stu2=(Student2) stu1.clone();
System.out.println("-----------深拷贝出的对象--------------");
System.out.println("stu2:"+stu2);
System.out.println("stu2->age:"+stu2.age);
System.out.println("stu2->num:"+stu2.people2);
System.out.println("stu2->pepole->num:"+stu2.people2.num);
stu1.age=3;
stu1.people2.num=6789;
System.out.println("--------修改原对象对深拷贝出的对象的影响-----------");
System.out.println("stu2:"+stu2);
System.out.println("stu2->age:"+stu2.age);
System.out.println("stu2->num:"+stu2.people2);
System.out.println("stu2->pepole->num:"+stu2.people2.num);
} catch (CloneNotSupportedException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
class Student2 implements Cloneable{
public int age;
public People2 people2;
@Override
public Object clone() throws CloneNotSupportedException {
Student2 st2=null;
try {
st2 = (Student2) super.clone();
if (people2 != null) {
st2.people2=(People2)people2.clone();
}
} catch (CloneNotSupportedException ignored) {
}
return st2;
}
}
class People2 implements Cloneable{
public int num;
@Override
public Object clone() throws CloneNotSupportedException {
return super.clone();
}
}
输出结果是这样的:
当改变原对象的基本数据类型与引用数据类型,新对象的基本数据类型和引用数据类型的值都不会变,而且可以看到引用对象的hashcode值是不一样的
总结一下,图大概是这样子的:
还有一个问题,包装类型的处理是遵循基本数据类型的。