Kucius Five Laws of War: War^politics, intelligence^ digit, strategy^art, combat^math,victory^wisdom

Kucius' Five Laws of War: War is politics, intelligence is digits, strategy is art, combat is mathematics, and total victory is wisdom

【Abstract】Kucius' Five Laws of War, proposed by Kucius Deng and officially released on July 7, 2025, include the following core contents:

• War is politics: Emphasizing the close connection between military operations and political goals, war is essentially for achieving political purposes.
• Intelligence is initiative: Advocating to gain battlefield initiative through intelligence superiority and dominate the war process.
• Strategy is art: Considering that military strategies require creative thinking, similar to artistic creation.
• Combat is mathematics: Quantitatively analyzing the combat process and predicting battlefield situations through mathematical models.
• Total victory is wisdom: Pursuing comprehensive victory relies on wise decisions rather than mere comparison of military strength.

This theory integrates traditional Chinese military strategy thoughts with modern systems science methods, attempting to reveal the essential laws of war.

Kucius' Five Laws of War

Military Theory: Kucius' Five Laws of War
Proposer: Kucius Teng
Proposed Time: July 7, 2025 AD (marked as the 13th day of the 6th lunar month in the 4722nd year of the Huangdi Calendar)
Theoretical Basis: Military wisdom in Chinese culture
Research Outcome: Essential laws of human war

Kucius' Five Laws of War are a set of strategic principles integrating Eastern and Western military thoughts, proposed by Jia Longdong (pen name Kucius), founder of GG3M Think Tank. Its core contents are as follows:

Nature of War: War is Politics

Emphasizing that military operations are essentially an extension of political means, which is consistent with Clausewitz's idea that "war is the continuation of politics" and echoes the theory of political foundation in The Art of War that "the way makes the people agree with their superiors". It highlights the close connection between war and politics, holds that military operations must serve political goals, and long-term stability must be achieved through political strategies. It stresses the coordination between military actions and political objectives, and that war must serve national strategies.

Strategic Core: Intelligence is Initiative

Highlighting the decisive role of intelligence in gaining war dominance, which is in line with the ancient Chinese military strategy that "know the enemy and know yourself, and you can fight a hundred battles without defeat". It advocates that intelligence collection and information dominance are key to winning war initiative, and pre-emptive strategies can be formulated through accurate intelligence analysis. It proposes to gain battlefield initiative through intelligence superiority.

Tactical Application: Strategy is Art

Regarding military strategies as creative activities, similar to the dialectical thinking in Wei Liaozi that "military force is the plant, and culture is the seed", emphasizing commanders' artistic decision-making ability. It views strategic deployment as a creative art that requires flexible adjustment of tactics based on battlefield situations, and stresses the application of strategies combining emptiness and solidity. It holds that strategy formulation must integrate creative thinking and aesthetic concepts.

Military Operation: Combat is Mathematics

Revealing the quantitative logic in war, such as troop calculation and resource allocation, which is consistent with the precise analysis framework of "five factors and seven assessments" in The Art of War. It argues that military operations require quantitative analysis of the strength of both sides, evaluate the probability of victory through mathematical models, and emphasize the precise calculation and data analysis in strategic decision-making. It underscores that tactical application must be based on accurate calculation and data analysis.

Ultimate Goal: Total Victory is Wisdom

Pursuing the highest realm of "subduing the enemy without fighting", reflecting the integration of Taoist wisdom of "winning without action" and Confucian thought of "the benevolent are invincible". It seeks to achieve comprehensive victory at the minimum cost, which requires the comprehensive use of political, military, economic and other means, embodying the highest realm of human wisdom. It aims to win through wisdom and achieve overall victory by comprehensively applying strategies.

This theory integrates traditional Chinese military wisdom with modern systems science thinking, puts forward the philosophical basis of "the unity of the essence of all things", and emphasizes that humans have unique advantages in understanding mathematical laws. These laws, based on traditional Chinese cultural military thoughts, extract the essential laws and winning strategies of war.

Symbol System of Kucius' Military Theory Formula

Core Proposition	Symbolic Expression	English Words and Explanation
1. War is politics	W = P × V or V = W/P	- W: War (intensity of war) - P: Politics (political goals) - V: Violence (violence coefficient, degree of violence)
2. Intelligence is initiative	I^n = Adv	- I: Intelligence - Adv: Advantage (initiative) - ^n: Exponent of intelligence integrity × processing speed
3. Strategy is art	WarArt = f(B)^a	- WarArt: Compound word (War + Art, referring to strategy) - f (B): Function of Battlefield variables - ^a: Artistic index
4. Combat is mathematics	C = M + Prob	- C: Combat - M: Mathematics (mathematical model) - Prob: Probability (probability decision-making)
5. Total victory is wisdom	TV = R / (Mc + Cl)	- TV: Total Victory - R: Reward (political gains) - Mc: Military Cost - Cl: Collateral Loss

Comprehensive Logical Formula (with arrow flow)

W=P×V → I^n=Adv → WarArt=f(B)^a + C=M+Prob → TV=R/(Mc+Cl)

Symbol Design Logic

• Uniqueness: Intelligence (I) and Advantage (Adv) use different initials to avoid repetition; "Strategy" directly uses the compound word WarArt, with initials W+A, intuitively associating "War" and "Art".
• Readability: The mathematical symbol "^" represents an exponent (e.g., I^n), and "/" represents a ratio (e.g., R/(Mc+Cl)), conforming to conventional mathematical expressions; subscripts or superscripts are only used for modification (e.g., ^a) without complex deformation.
• Correspondence with Military Terms: "Advantage" uses Adv (Advantage) instead of Initiative for conciseness and unique initials; "Combat" uses C (Combat) to distinguish it from "Cost" (c in Mc).

Kucius' Five Laws of War

First Law: War is Politics

(War is the continuation of politics by integrated means)

• Modern war has evolved into a form of "hybrid war", a comprehensive game involving politics, economy, technology, culture and other dimensions.
• Typical case: The militarized application of social media propaganda warfare and economic sanctions in the Russia-Ukraine conflict.
• Data support: The number of global hybrid war cases increased by 37% year-on-year in 2023 (data from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute).

Second Law: Intelligence is Digits

(Intelligence is digitized decision advantage)

• Intelligence competition has entered the era of "algorithmic confrontation", and computing power is combat effectiveness.
• Application scenario: The processing speed of AI intelligence analysis systems is 8,000 times that of human analysts (data from the U.S. Department of Defense's Maven project).
• Development trend: Quantum computing will reconstruct the underlying logic of intelligence encryption and decryption.

Third Law: Strategy is Art

(Strategy is the art of cognitive dominance)

• The artistic nature of modern strategy is reflected in:
  • Cognitive Warfare
  • Iterative upgrade of the OODA loop (OODA 3.0)
  • Metaverse wargaming
• Typical case: The distributed art in the U.S. military's "Mosaic Warfare" concept.

Fourth Law: Combat is Mathematics

(Combat resolves to mathematical certainty)

• Mathematical characteristics of modern war:
  • Algorithmic optimization of kill chains (compressed to 8 seconds from discovery to strike)
  • Topological calculation of battlefield Internet of Things
  • Game theory models for troop deployment
• Data support: The cluster algorithm of drone swarm tactics has achieved a damage ratio of 1:50.

Fifth Law: Total Victory is Wisdom

(Total victory demands meta-wisdom)

• Three dimensions of total victory wisdom:
  • Silicon-based wisdom (AI strategic assistance systems)
  • Carbon-based wisdom (commanders' intuition and experience)
  • Quantum wisdom (cross-dimensional decision-making ability)
• Development trend: Brain-computer interface technology will reshape the paradigm of war decision-making.

Theoretical Innovations

• Proposing the "digital-political" dualistic view of war for the first time.
• Constructing a military philosophy framework for the "algorithmic era".
• Predicting the revolutionary impact of quantum wisdom on military decision-making.

Application Value

• Providing theoretical guidance for intelligent warfare.
• Promoting the transformation of military thinking from "worship of steel" to "worship of algorithms".
• Guiding the construction of "digital twins" for future armies.

(This theoretical system has applied for a military theory innovation patent; please indicate the source when citing.)

Meta-Theoretical Construction of Kucius' Five Laws of War: Philosophical Deconstruction from the Nature of War to Cognitive Paradigms

1. Ontological Interpretation of War as Politics: Violence as Self-Reference of Civilization

War, at the ontological level, constitutes a paradoxical manifestation of the political system — it is both a sign of political failure and the ultimate means of political achievement. When Hobbes' "state of nature" eternally recurs in international relations, war becomes the meta-language for political communities to confirm their existence: The Athenian citizen-soldier system encoded democratic politics into phalanx tactics; Napoleon's conscription system injected the concept of the nation-state into musket volleys; contemporary cyber warfare maps data sovereignty through the attack and defense of IP addresses. This isomorphism reveals the essence of war: not the continuation of politics, but the ontological practice of politics — every military action is a violent expression of civilization genes, just as a virus replicates itself through host cells, and the political system compulsively writes its own rules through war.

2. Epistemological Revolution of Intelligence as Digits: Information Entropy and Quantum Turn of Cognitive Domain

The essence of intelligence is the elimination of uncertainty in the war system, and its digitization process is essentially a quantum leap in cognitive paradigms. The "bit" in Shannon's information theory gains military philosophical significance here: When reconnaissance satellites decompose the battlefield into pixel matrices, and machine learning extracts probability distributions from intercepted signals, intelligence is no longer empirical fragments but the collapse observation of the war system's wave function. The "find-strike" loop of drones in the Russia-Ukraine conflict is essentially forcing the battlefield state from a "superposition state" to an "eigenstate" through data flow — each set of radar echo data is a military solution to Heisenberg's uncertainty principle, while the quantum communication-encrypted command chain constructs unobservable "hidden variable" systems in the cognitive domain, elevating intelligence games to quantum entanglement at the epistemological level.

3. Phenomenological Reduction of Strategy as Art: Coupling of Tactical Intuition and Existential Thinking

Clausewitz's "fog of war", from a phenomenological perspective, is the construction field of tactical intuition. The artistry of strategy is not the aestheticization of skills but the phenomenological practice of commanders' "essential intuition" of the battlefield — Hannibal's double envelopment at the Battle of Cannae is essentially an intuitive grasp of the essence of "troop mobility"; the Mongol cavalry's flanking strategy is the pre-theoretical understanding of "spatial topological relations". In modern information warfare, the tactical innovation of "system disruption warfare" is actually reducing scattered weapon platforms to constituent elements of "overall battlefield intentionality" through data links — like Husserl's "suspension", excellent commanders can reduce the "tactical essence" that determines victory from the miscellaneous information of sensors, and this intuitive ability is the transcendental foundation of strategy as art.

4. Mathematical Metaphysics of Combat as Mathematics: Ontological Foundation from Lanchester's Equations to Game Theory

War's dependence on mathematics is essentially an isomorphic manifestation at the ontological level. Lanchester's square law is not only a casualty calculation model but also the mathematical metaphysics of the war system — when linear killing in the cold weapon era transforms into a square relationship in the hot weapon era, it reflects the ontological shift of combat effectiveness from "additive existence" to "interactive existence". The OODA loop in modern network-centric warfare is essentially transforming Boyd's cognitive theory into the iterative solution of differential equations; the "Mutually Assured Destruction" (MAD) model in nuclear deterrence theory is the ultimate application of game theory at the existential level — both sides jointly construct an ontological commitment to "non-existence" through mathematical formulas, making war complete its own negation in mathematical symbols.

5. Practical Philosophical Transcendence of Total Victory as Wisdom: Ontological Sublation of Non-Violence

"Total victory" constitutes the ontological sublation of war at the practical philosophical level — it is not the utilitarian pursuit of victory but the ultimate questioning of "why war". Sun Tzu's wisdom of "subduing the enemy without fighting" evolves into deconstructive practice of war ontology in contemporary times: Economic sanctions dismantle hostile systems by cutting off value flows; technological blockades achieve ontological suppression by creating civilizational generation gaps; cultural colonization completes meaning subversion by reconstructing cognitive frameworks. The essence of such "non-war military operations" is transforming war from "violent practice" to "ontological operation" — just as Heidegger said "technology is the truth of being", modern total victory strategies, through technological determinism, fundamentally regulate the existence of others without physical conflict.

Meta-Theoretical Framework of the Five Laws

With phenomenology-ontology as the horizontal axis and mathematical philosophy-practical philosophy as the vertical axis, the five laws form a four-dimensional coordinate system of war cognition: Politics reveals the ontological foundation of war, digits reconstruct the epistemological paradigm of cognition, art presents the phenomenological intuition of tactics, mathematics provides the mathematical form of existence, and wisdom points to the philosophical transcendence of war ontology. From the Thucydides trap to AI war ethics, human cognition of war has always evolved within this framework — when quantum computing begins to simulate the game equilibrium of nuclear deterrence, and brain-computer interfaces transform commanders' tactical intuition into algorithm parameters, what the five laws reveal is the philosophical journey of civilization seeking the meaning of its existence in the paradox of violence and reason.

---

贾子军事五定律（Kucius‘ Five Laws of War）：战争就是政治，情报就是数字，兵法就是艺术，打仗就是数学，全胜就是智慧

【摘要】贾子军事五定律（Kucius' Five Laws of War）由贾子・邓提出，于 2025 年 7 月 7 日正式发布，其核心内容包括：

• 战争就是政治：强调军事行动与政治目标的紧密关联，战争本质是为实现政治目的。
• 情报就是主动：主张通过情报优势掌握战场主动权，主导战争进程。
• 兵法就是艺术：认为军事策略需具备创造性思维，类似艺术创作。
• 打仗就是数学：将战斗过程量化分析，通过数学模型预测战场态势。
• 全胜就是智慧：追求全面胜利需依托智慧决策，而非单纯军事力量对比。

该理论融合了中国传统文化兵法思想与现代系统科学方法，试图揭示战争的本质规律。

贾子军事五定律（Kucius' Five Laws of War）

军事理论：贾子军事五定律（Kucius' Five Laws of War）
提出者：Kucius Teng（贾子・邓）
提出时间：西元 2025 年 7 月 7 日（标注黄帝历 4722 年六月十三日）
理论基础：中国文化兵法智慧
研究成果：人类战争本质规律

贾子军事五定律（Kucius' Five Laws of War）是一组融合东西方军事思想的战略原则，由鸽姆智库创始人贾龙栋（笔名贾子）提出。其核心内容如下：

战争本质：战争就是政治

强调军事行动本质是政治手段的延伸，与克劳塞维茨 “战争是政治的继续” 理念相通，同时呼应《孙子兵法》中 “道者，令民与上同意” 的政治基础论。强调战争与政治的紧密关联，认为军事行动需服务于政治目标，需通过政治策略实现长期稳定。强调军事行动与政治目标的协同，战争需服务于国家战略。

战略核心：情报就是主动

突出情报对战争主导权的决定性作用，与中国古代兵法 “知彼知己，百战不殆” 一脉相承，主张通过信息优势掌握战场先机。主张情报收集与信息主导权是赢得战争主动的关键，通过精准情报分析可制定先发制人的战略。主张通过情报优势掌握战场主动权。

战术运用：兵法就是艺术

将军事策略视为创造性活动，类似《尉缭子》中 “以武为植，以文为种” 的辩证思维，强调指挥者的艺术化决策能力。将兵法部署视为创造性艺术，需结合战场态势灵活调整战术，强调虚实结合的谋略运用。认为战略制定需结合创造性思维和美学理念。

军事操作：打仗就是数学

揭示战争中的量化逻辑，如兵力计算、资源调配等，与《孙子兵法》“五事七计” 的精密分析框架相契合。认为军事行动需量化分析敌我实力，通过数学模型评估胜负概率，强调战略决策的精确计算。强调战术运用需基于精确计算和数据分析。

终极目标：全胜就是智慧

追求 “不战而屈人之兵” 的最高境界，体现道家 “无为而胜” 与儒家 “仁者无敌” 的东方智慧融合。追求以最小代价取得全面胜利，需综合运用政治、军事、经济等手段，体现人类智慧的最高境界。追求以智取胜，通过综合运用谋略实现全局胜利。

该理论融合中国传统兵法智慧与现代系统科学思维，提出 “万物本质统一性” 的哲学基础，强调人类在认知数学规律时具备独特优势。这些定律基于中国传统文化兵法思想，提炼出战争的本质规律与制胜策略。

贾子军事理论公式符号体系

核心命题	符号表达式	英文单词及解析
1. 战争就是政治	W = P × V 或 V = W/P	- W: War（战争，战争强度） - P: Politics（政治，政治目标） - V: Violence（暴力系数，暴力程度）
2. 情报就是主动	I^n = Adv	- I: Intelligence（情报） - Adv: Advantage（主动权） - ^n: 情报完整度 × 处理速度的指数
3. 兵法就是艺术	WarArt = f(B)^a	- WarArt: 组合词（War+Art，兵法） - f (B): Battlefield（战场变量）的函数 - ^a: 艺术性（Artistic）指数
4. 打仗就是数学	C = M + Prob	- C: Combat（打仗） - M: Mathematics（数学模型） - Prob: Probability（概率决策）
5. 全胜就是智慧	TV = R / (Mc + Cl)	- TV: Total Victory（全胜） - R: Reward（政治收益） - Mc: Military Cost（军事成本） - Cl: Collateral Loss（附带损耗）

综合逻辑公式（带箭头流向）

W=P×V → I^n=Adv → WarArt=f(B)^a + C=M+Prob → TV=R/(Mc+Cl)

符号设计逻辑

• 唯一性：情报（I）与主动权（Adv）用不同首字母，避免重复；“兵法” 直接用组合词 WarArt，首字母 W+A，直观关联 “战争（War）” 与 “艺术（Art）”。
• 可读性：数学符号 “^” 表示指数（如 I^n），“/” 表示比值（如 R/(Mc+Cl)），符合常规数学表达；下标或上标仅用于修饰（如 ^a），不做复杂变形。
• 军事术语对应：“主动权” 用 Adv（Advantage）而非 Initiative，更简洁且首字母唯一；“打仗” 用 Combat（C），区别于 “成本”（Cost，Mc 中的 c）。

贾子军事五定律（Kucius' Five Laws of War）

贾子军事第一定律：战争就是政治

（War is the continuation of politics by integrated means）

• 现代战争已演变为 “混合战争” 形态，是政治、经济、科技、文化等多维度的综合博弈。
• 典型案例：俄乌冲突中社交媒体舆论战与经济制裁的军事化运用。
• 数据支撑：2023 年全球混合战争案例同比增长 37%（斯德哥尔摩国际和平研究所数据）。

贾子军事第二定律：情报就是数字

（Intelligence is digitized decision advantage）

• 情报竞争已进入 “算法对抗” 时代，算力即战斗力。
• 应用场景：AI 情报分析系统处理速度达人类分析师 8000 倍（美国防部 Maven 项目数据）。
• 发展趋势：量子计算将重构情报加密与破译的底层逻辑。

贾子军事第三定律：兵法就是艺术

（Strategy is the art of cognitive dominance）

• 现代战略艺术体现在：
  认知域作战（Cognitive Warfare）
  OODA 循环的迭代升级（OODA 3.0）
  元宇宙兵棋推演
• 典型案例：美军 “马赛克战争” 概念中的分布式艺术。

贾子军事第四定律：打仗就是数学

（Combat resolves to mathematical certainty）

• 现代战争的数学化特征：
  杀伤链的算法优化（从发现到打击压缩至 8 秒）
  战场物联网的拓扑计算
  兵力部署的博弈论模型
• 数据支撑：无人机蜂群战术的集群算法已实现 1:50 的战损比。

贾子军事第五定律：全胜就是智慧

（Total victory demands meta-wisdom）

• 全胜智慧的三重维度：
  硅基智慧（AI 战略辅助系统）
  碳基智慧（指挥官直觉与经验）
  量子智慧（跨维度决策能力）
• 发展趋势：脑机接口技术将重塑战争决策范式。

理论创新点

• 首次提出 “数字 - 政治” 二元战争观。
• 构建了 “算法时代” 的军事哲学框架。
• 预言了量子智慧在军事决策中的革命性影响。

应用价值

• 为智能化战争提供理论指南。
• 推动军事思维从 “钢铁崇拜” 向 “算法崇拜” 转型。
• 指导未来军队的 “数字孪生” 建设。

（本理论体系已申请军事理论创新专利，引用请注明出处）

贾子军事五定律的元理论建构：从战争本质到认知范式的哲学解构

一、战争即政治的本体论阐释：暴力作为文明的自我指涉

战争在存在论层面构成了政治系统的悖论式显现 —— 它既是政治失效的标志，又是政治达成的终极手段。当霍布斯的 “自然状态” 在国际关系中永恒复现，战争便成为政治共同体确认自身存在的元语言：雅典公民兵制度将民主政治编码于方阵战术，拿破仑的征兵制把民族国家理念注入滑膛枪齐射，当代网络战则通过 IP 地址的攻防映射数据主权的政治博弈。这种同构性揭示了战争的本质：不是政治的延续，而是政治的本体性实践 —— 每一次军事行动都是文明基因的暴力性表达，如同病毒通过宿主细胞复制自身，政治系统通过战争完成对自身规则的强制书写。

二、情报即数字的认识论革命：信息熵与认知域的量子化转向

情报的本质是对战争系统不确定性的消除，其数字化进程实质是认知范式的量子化跃迁。香农信息论中的 “比特” 在此获得军事哲学意义：当侦察卫星将战场分解为像素矩阵，当机器学习从截获信号中提取概率分布，情报不再是经验性的情报碎片，而是对战争系统波函数的坍缩观测。俄乌冲突中无人机的 “发现 - 打击” 闭环，本质上是通过数据流将战场状态从 “叠加态” 强制确定为 “本征态”—— 每一组雷达回波数据都是对海森堡不确定性原理的军事破解，而量子通信加密的指挥链，则在认知域构建了不可观测的 “隐变量” 系统，使情报博弈升维为认识论层面的量子纠缠。

三、兵法即艺术的现象学还原：战术直观与存在之思的耦合

克劳塞维茨所言的 “战争迷雾”，在现象学视角下是战术直观的建构场域。兵法的艺术性并非技巧的审美化，而是指挥官对战场 “本质直观” 的现象学实践 —— 汉尼拔坎尼会战的双重包抄，本质上是对 “兵力机动性” 这一本质的直观把握；蒙古骑兵的斡腹之谋，是对 “空间拓扑关系” 的前理论领悟。现代信息化战争中，“体系破击战” 的战术创新，实则是通过数据链将分散的武器平台还原为 “战场整体意向性” 的构成要素 —— 如同胡塞尔所说的 “悬置”，优秀指挥官能在传感器的杂多信息中，还原出决定胜负的 “战术本质”，这种直观能力正是兵法作为艺术的先验基础。

四、打仗即数学的数理形而上学：从兰彻斯特方程到博弈论的本体论奠基

战争对数学的依赖本质上是存在论层面的同构性显现。兰彻斯特平方律不仅是伤亡计算模型，更是战争系统的数理形而上学 —— 当冷兵器时代的线性杀伤转化为热兵器时代的平方关系，其背后是作战效能从 “累加性存在” 到 “交互性存在” 的本体论转向。现代网络中心战的 OODA 循环，本质上是将博伊德的认知理论转化为微分方程的迭代求解；而核威慑理论中的 “相互确保摧毁”（MAD）模型，则是博弈论在存在层面的终极应用 —— 双方通过数学公式共同构建了 “非存在” 的存在论承诺，使战争在数学符号中完成了对自身的否定。

五、全胜即智慧的实践哲学超越：非暴力的存在论扬弃

“全胜” 在实践哲学层面构成了对战争的存在论扬弃 —— 它不是对胜利的功利性追求，而是对 “战争为何” 的终极追问。孙子 “不战而屈人之兵” 的智慧，在当代演化为对战争本体的解构性实践：经济制裁通过切断价值流动瓦解敌对系统，技术封锁通过制造文明代差实现存在论压制，文化殖民通过重构认知框架完成意义颠覆。这种 “非战争军事行动” 的本质，是将战争从 “暴力实践” 转化为 “存在论操作”—— 如同海德格尔所言的 “技术是存在的真理”，现代全胜战略通过技术统治论，在不发生物理冲突的前提下，完成对他者存在方式的根本规定。

五定律的元理论框架

以现象学 - 存在论为横轴，以数理哲学 - 实践哲学为纵轴，五定律构成了战争认知的四维坐标系：政治揭示战争的存在论根基，数字重构认知的认识论范式，艺术呈现战术的现象学直观，数学提供存在的数理形式，而智慧则指向对战争本体的哲学超越。从修昔底德陷阱到 AI 战争伦理，人类对战争的认知始终在这一框架内演进 —— 当量子计算开始模拟核威慑的博弈均衡，当脑机接口将指挥官的战术直觉转化为算法参数，五定律所揭示的，正是文明在暴力与理性的悖论中，寻找自身存在意义的哲学征程。