Slave被误写入数据如何恢复到主库

最新推荐文章于 2024-09-26 16:48:29 发布

原创最新推荐文章于 2024-09-26 16:48:29 发布 · 409 阅读

7 ·

CC 4.0 BY-SA版权

文章标签：

#GreatSQL #MySQL

文章探讨了在GreatSQL主从复制环境中，如何处理由于误操作导致从库写入数据而主库未同步的情况，包括使用二进制日志分析和手动复制解决方法。最后，确认主库数据正常同步至从库的后续测试结果。

背景

在GreatSQL主从复制环境中，有时候可能会出现一些误操作，将本应该写入到主库的数据写入到了从库，导致主从数据不一致，影响数据同步。是否可以将写入从库的数据同步写入主库呢？

测试环境

角色	IP地址	数据库开放端口	版本
主库	192.168.137.179	3308	GreatSQL 8.0.32
从库	192.168.137.180	3308	GreatSQL 8.0.32

复制链路：

greatsql> show slave status\G;
*************************** 1. row ***************************
               Slave_IO_State: Waiting for source to send event
                  Master_Host: 192.168.137.179
                  Master_User: root
                  Master_Port: 3308
                Connect_Retry: 60
              Master_Log_File: binlog.000001
          Read_Master_Log_Pos: 157
               Relay_Log_File: oracle_dts-relay-bin.000002
                Relay_Log_Pos: 367
        Relay_Master_Log_File: binlog.000001
             Slave_IO_Running: Yes
            Slave_SQL_Running: Yes

表数据

主库

greatsql> select * from dept;
+--------+------------+----------+
| DEPTNO | DNAME      | LOC      |
+--------+------------+----------+
|     10 | ACCOUNTING | NEW YORK |
|     20 | RESEARCH   | DALLAS   |
|     30 | SALES      | CHICAGO  |
|     40 | OPERATIONS | BOSTON   |
|     60 | it         | 成都     |
+--------+------------+----------+
5 rows in set (0.00 sec)

greatsql> insert into dept select 70,'IT','CTU';
Query OK, 1 row affected (0.01 sec)
Records: 1  Duplicates: 0  Warnings: 0

greatsql> commit;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec)

从库

greatsql> select * from dept;
+--------+------------+----------+
| DEPTNO | DNAME      | LOC      |
+--------+------------+----------+
|     10 | ACCOUNTING | NEW YORK |
|     20 | RESEARCH   | DALLAS   |
|     30 | SALES      | CHICAGO  |
|     40 | OPERATIONS | BOSTON   |
|     60 | it         | 成都     |
|     70 | IT         | CTU      |
+--------+------------+----------+
6 rows in set (0.00 sec)

主库写入的数据正常同步到从库

在从库写入数据

greatsql> insert into dept select 80,'IT','SZ';
Query OK, 1 row affected (0.01 sec)
Records: 1  Duplicates: 0  Warnings: 0

greatsql> insert into dept select 90,'SALES','SZ';
Query OK, 1 row affected (0.01 sec)
Records: 1  Duplicates: 0  Warnings: 0

从库数据

greatsql> select * from dept;
+--------+------------+----------+
| DEPTNO | DNAME      | LOC      |
+--------+------------+----------+
|     10 | ACCOUNTING | NEW YORK |
|     20 | RESEARCH   | DALLAS   |
|     30 | SALES      | CHICAGO  |
|     40 | OPERATIONS | BOSTON   |
|     60 | it         | 成都     |
|     70 | IT         | CTU      |
|     80 | IT         | SZ       |
|     90 | SALES      | SZ       |
+--------+------------+----------+
8 rows in set (0.00 sec)

主库数据

greatsql> select * from dept;
+--------+------------+----------+
| DEPTNO | DNAME      | LOC      |
+--------+------------+----------+
|     10 | ACCOUNTING | NEW YORK |
|     20 | RESEARCH   | DALLAS   |
|     30 | SALES      | CHICAGO  |
|     40 | OPERATIONS | BOSTON   |
|     60 | it         | 成都     |
|     70 | IT         | CTU      |
+--------+------------+----------+
6 rows in set (0.01 sec)

此时从库写入的数据在主库中并没有出现

解析从库的二进制日志

$ mysqlbinlog -vv --base64-output=decode-rows  binlog.000002>b002.sql

 BEGIN
/*!*/;

#at 354
#240221 16:10:25 server id 18001  end_log_pos 416 CRC32 0xcc81584b      Table_map: `scott`.`dept` mapped to number 101
#has_generated_invisible_primary_key=0
#at 416
#240221 16:10:25 server id 18001  end_log_pos 462 CRC32 0x5149e38a      Write_rows: table id 101 flags:
 STMT_END_F

###INSERT INTO `scott`.`dept`
###SET
###@1=80 /* INT meta=0 nullable=0 is_null=0 */
###@2='IT' /* VARSTRING(56) meta=56 nullable=1 is_null=0 */
###@3='SZ' /* VARSTRING(52) meta=52 nullable=1 is_null=0 */
#at 462
#240221 16:10:25 server id 18001  end_log_pos 493 CRC32 0xab795e4a      Xid = 34

可以看到写入的从库写入的数据在 binlog.000002，我们可以通过 grep 从库的 server id 确定日志文件中有没有在从库写入的数据。

复制从库日志到主库

$ scp binlog.000002  192.168.137.179:/tmp/
Warning: Permanently added '192.168.137.179' (ECDSA) to the list of known hosts.
root@192.168.137.179's password: 
binlog.000002                                                        100%  836     1.1MB/s   00:00

应用从库的二进制日志

应用从库的日志到主库

$ mysqlbinlog binlog.000002|mysql -uroot -p -h127.1 -P3308

主库应用从库二进制日志时，从库二进制日志信息未发生变化

greatsql> show binary logs;
+---------------+-----------+-----------+
| Log_name      | File_size | Encrypted |
+---------------+-----------+-----------+
| binlog.000001 |       498 | No        |
| binlog.000002 |       836 | No        |
| binlog.000003 |       237 | No        |
+---------------+-----------+-----------+
3 rows in set (0.00 sec)

主从复制链路状态正常

greatsql> show slave status\G;
*************************** 1. row ***************************
               Slave_IO_State: Waiting for source to send event
                  Master_Host: 192.168.137.179
                  Master_User: root
                  Master_Port: 3308
                Connect_Retry: 60
              Master_Log_File: binlog.000001
          Read_Master_Log_Pos: 1059
               Relay_Log_File: oracle_dts-relay-bin.000002
                Relay_Log_Pos: 1269
        Relay_Master_Log_File: binlog.000001
             Slave_IO_Running: Yes
            Slave_SQL_Running: Yes

可以看到主库在应用从库产生的二进制日志时，从库没有重复应用这些二进制日志(By default, the replication I/O (receiver) thread does not write binary log events to the relay log if they have the replica's server ID (this optimization helps save disk usage). )，出现主键冲突，导致复制状态出错

查看主库数据

greatsql> select * from dept;
+--------+------------+----------+
| DEPTNO | DNAME      | LOC      |
+--------+------------+----------+
|     10 | ACCOUNTING | NEW YORK |
|     20 | RESEARCH   | DALLAS   |
|     30 | SALES      | CHICAGO  |
|     40 | OPERATIONS | BOSTON   |
|     60 | it         | 成都     |
|     70 | IT         | CTU      |
|     80 | IT         | SZ       |
|     90 | SALES      | SZ       |
+--------+------------+----------+
8 rows in set (0.00 sec)

后续测试，主库写入数据可正常同步到从库。

Enjoy GreatSQL :)