一、为何源类+load先执行 源类分类没有覆盖+load方法？
那得看源码了看objc-os中的_objc_init方法中
void _objc_init(void)
{
static bool initialized = false;
if (initialized) return;
initialized = true;
// fixme defer initialization until an objc-using image is found?
environ_init();
tls_init();
static_init();
runtime_init();
exception_init();
cache_init();
_imp_implementationWithBlock_init();
_dyld_objc_notify_register(&map_images, load_images, unmap_image);
#if __OBJC2__
didCallDyldNotifyRegister = true;
#endif
}
_dyld_objc_notify_register(&map_images, load_images, unmap_image); 在objc-runtime-new找到load_images方法
void
load_images(const char *path __unused, const struct mach_header *mh)
{
if (!didInitialAttachCategories && didCallDyldNotifyRegister) {
didInitialAttachCategories = true;
loadAllCategories();
}
// Return without taking locks if there are no +load methods here.
if (!hasLoadMethods((const headerType *)mh)) return;
recursive_mutex_locker_t lock(loadMethodLock);
// Discover load methods
{
mutex_locker_t lock2(runtimeLock);
prepare_load_methods((const headerType *)mh);
}
// Call +load methods (without runtimeLock - re-entrant)
call_load_methods();
}
查看call_methods方法 objc-loadmethod文件中看到
开启一个自动释放池来访问类中的+loads方法，第二步才调用分类方法，直到没有跟多类或者分类方法
void call_load_methods(void)
{
static bool loading = NO;
bool more_categories;
loadMethodLock.assertLocked();
// Re-entrant calls do nothing; the outermost call will finish the job.
if (loading) return;
loading = YES;
void *pool = objc_autoreleasePoolPush();
do {
// 1. Repeatedly call class +loads until there aren't any more
while (loadable_classes_used > 0) {
call_class_loads();
}
// 2. Call category +loads ONCE
more_categories = call_category_loads();
// 3. Run more +loads if there are classes OR more untried categories
} while (loadable_classes_used > 0 || more_categories);
objc_autoreleasePoolPop(pool);
loading = NO;
}
这个调用和编译顺序是没有关系的
查看call_class_loads函数实现
static void call_class_loads(void){
int i;
// Detach current loadable list.
struct loadable_class *classes = loadable_classes;
int used = loadable_classes_used;
loadable_classes = nil;
loadable_classes_allocated = 0;
loadable_classes_used = 0;
// Call all +loads for the detached list.
for (i = 0; i < used; i++) {
Class cls = classes[i].cls;
load_method_t load_method = (load_method_t)classes[i].method;
if (!cls) continue;
if (PrintLoading) {
_objc_inform("LOAD: +[%s load]\n", cls->nameForLogging());
}
(*load_method)(cls, @selector(load));
}
// Destroy the detached list.
if (classes) free(classes);
}
拿到load_method 函数指针直接调用load函数
load_method_t load_method = (load_method_t)classes[i].method;
(*load_method)(cls, @selector(load));
总结
load调用和编译顺序是没有关系的,因为在_objc_init---load_images---call_load_methods----call_class_loads中
load_method_t load_method = (load_method_t)classes[i].method;
(*load_method)(cls, @selector(load));
分类为何会覆盖类中的方法，因为在它是通过消息机制进传递，类对象会通过isa指针找到元类中的方法列表进行查询。
二、initialize方法
001 initialize方法会在类第一次接收到消息时调用。走的是objc_msgSend调用。
调用顺序：先调用父类的+initialize，再调用子类的initialize。
[MyObj alloc] ---->objc_msgSend([MyObj class],@selector(alloc))
isa找到类对象/元类对象，寻找方法调用；superclass找到类对象/元类对象寻找方法；
看源码
objc-runtime-new文件下
/***********************************************************************
* class_getInstanceMethod. Return the instance method for the
* specified class and selector.
**********************************************************************/
Method class_getInstanceMethod(Class cls, SEL sel)
{
if (!cls || !sel) return nil;
// This deliberately avoids +initialize because it historically did so.
// This implementation is a bit weird because it's the only place that
// wants a Method instead of an IMP.
#warning fixme build and search caches
// Search method lists, try method resolver, etc.
lookUpImpOrForward(nil, sel, cls, LOOKUP_RESOLVER);
#warning fixme build and search caches
return _class_getMethod(cls, sel);
}
objc-initialize.mm
void callInitialize(Class cls)
{
((void(*)(Class, SEL))objc_msgSend)(cls, @selector(initialize));
asm("");
}
核心代码
// Try to atomically set CLS_INITIALIZING.
SmallVector<_objc_willInitializeClassCallback, 1> localWillInitializeFuncs;
{
monitor_locker_t lock(classInitLock);
if (!cls->isInitialized() && !cls->isInitializing()) {
cls->setInitializing();
reallyInitialize = YES;
// Grab a copy of the will-initialize funcs with the lock held.
localWillInitializeFuncs.initFrom(willInitializeFuncs);
}
}
步骤：
先确定superclass调用initialize，
接下来就是在当前类调用initialize
/***********************************************************************
* class_initialize. Send the '+initialize' message on demand to any
* uninitialized class. Force initialization of superclasses first.
**********************************************************************/
void initializeNonMetaClass(Class cls)
{
ASSERT(!cls->isMetaClass());
Class supercls;
bool reallyInitialize = NO;
// Make sure super is done initializing BEFORE beginning to initialize cls.
// See note about deadlock above.
//父类优先初始化
supercls = cls->superclass;
if (supercls && !supercls->isInitialized()) {
initializeNonMetaClass(supercls);
}
// Try to atomically set CLS_INITIALIZING.
SmallVector<_objc_willInitializeClassCallback, 1> localWillInitializeFuncs;
{
monitor_locker_t lock(classInitLock);
if (!cls->isInitialized() && !cls->isInitializing()) {
cls->setInitializing();
reallyInitialize = YES;
// Grab a copy of the will-initialize funcs with the lock held.
localWillInitializeFuncs.initFrom(willInitializeFuncs);
}
}
if (reallyInitialize) {
// We successfully set the CLS_INITIALIZING bit. Initialize the class.
// Record that we're initializing this class so we can message it.
_setThisThreadIsInitializingClass(cls);
if (MultithreadedForkChild) {
// LOL JK we don't really call +initialize methods after fork().
performForkChildInitialize(cls, supercls);
return;
}
for (auto callback : localWillInitializeFuncs)
callback.f(callback.context, cls);
// Send the +initialize message.
// Note that +initialize is sent to the superclass (again) if
// this class doesn't implement +initialize. 2157218
if (PrintInitializing) {
_objc_inform("INITIALIZE: thread %p: calling +[%s initialize]",
objc_thread_self(), cls->nameForLogging());
}
// Exceptions: A +initialize call that throws an exception
// is deemed to be a complete and successful +initialize.
//
// Only __OBJC2__ adds these handlers. !__OBJC2__ has a
// bootstrapping problem of this versus CF's call to
// objc_exception_set_functions().
#if __OBJC2__
@try
#endif
{
callInitialize(cls);
if (PrintInitializing) {
_objc_inform("INITIALIZE: thread %p: finished +[%s initialize]",
objc_thread_self(), cls->nameForLogging());
}
}
#if __OBJC2__
@catch (...) {
if (PrintInitializing) {
_objc_inform("INITIALIZE: thread %p: +[%s initialize] "
"threw an exception",
objc_thread_self(), cls->nameForLogging());
}
@throw;
}
@finally
#endif
{
// Done initializing.
lockAndFinishInitializing(cls, supercls);
}
return;
}
else if (cls->isInitializing()) {
// We couldn't set INITIALIZING because INITIALIZING was already set.
// If this thread set it earlier, continue normally.
// If some other thread set it, block until initialize is done.
// It's ok if INITIALIZING changes to INITIALIZED while we're here,
// because we safely check for INITIALIZED inside the lock
// before blocking.
if (_thisThreadIsInitializingClass(cls)) {
return;
} else if (!MultithreadedForkChild) {
waitForInitializeToComplete(cls);
return;
} else {
// We're on the child side of fork(), facing a class that
// was initializing by some other thread when fork() was called.
_setThisThreadIsInitializingClass(cls);
performForkChildInitialize(cls, supercls);
}
}
else if (cls->isInitialized()) {
// Set CLS_INITIALIZING failed because someone else already
// initialized the class. Continue normally.
// NOTE this check must come AFTER the ISINITIALIZING case.
// Otherwise: Another thread is initializing this class. ISINITIALIZED
// is false. Skip this clause. Then the other thread finishes
// initialization and sets INITIALIZING=no and INITIALIZED=yes.
// Skip the ISINITIALIZING clause. Die horribly.
return;
}
else {
// We shouldn't be here.
_objc_fatal("thread-safe class init in objc runtime is buggy!");
}
}
总结：
+ initializehe 和+load最大的区别在于 +initializehe是通过objc_msgSend（）进行调用
如果子类没有实现+initialize，会调用父类的+initialize，所以父类会被多次调用
如果分类中实现了+initialize就覆盖类本身的+initialize
扫一扫
被折叠的 条评论
为什么被折叠?
到【灌水乐园】发言
