Coding Standards and Best Practices for "appobjects" Files

本文介绍了AppObjects类文件的最佳实践,包括使用Javadoc注释、遵循统一的命名规范、利用ObjectGetter类包装器以及如何为每个类文件添加单元测试等。这些指南有助于提高代码的可维护性和一致性。

 1. Each test object getter in an appobjects class file should be properly commented with javadoc.

Tip: You can easily add javadoc to your code by placing the cursor on the top line of the method you want to javadoc and type /**<enter>. RFT will create a javadoc outline for you including parameters.

 

Standard appobject getter javadoc header (section in light blue text below):

/**
  * @return WButton for OK button in Add Folder page
  */

 public WButton getButton_OK() {

...

 }

 

The appobject class file should also have a javadoc header above the class statement that provides the name of the appobjects class file and describes what the class file is (see below):

/**
 * Class Name   : <b>Browser</b> <BR>
 * Generated     : Oct 1, 2003 4:26:21 PM <BR>
 * Description   : Web Browser Test Object Library <BR>
 * Original Host : WinNT Version 5.0  Build 2195 (Service Pack 4) <BR>
 *
 * @since  2007/10/01 <BR>
 * @author *<BR>
 */


public class Browser extends BrowserHelper
{

...


2. All appobject getters should use a ObjectGetter class wrapper:

There are several getter wrappers in the ObjectGetter class. One for almost every situation. If your situation is a rare special case that a standard wrapper will not work then you can create a custom object getter in your appobject file but this should only be used in special cases. Using the standard getters makes it easy to make global changes to all test objects by only having to modify code in one place. It also makes it easier to manage large projects with lots of test objects. Below is an example of a appobject getter method using a standard ObjectGetter class wrapper. Almost all appobject getters should like this:

 public WButton getButton_Cancel()
 {
  try{return new WButton(og.getNthObject(0,Webfuncs.gsTitleProp, new RegularExpression(".*Cancel.*", false), Webfuncs.gsClassProp, Webfuncs.gsHtmlBtnRef));}catch(Exception e){return null;}   
 }


3.  All appobject getter names should follow the following format:

get<class_type>_<DescriptiveObjectName>() where <class_type> is equal to one of the following:
 
WTextField = Text
WButton = Button
WListBox = List
WLink = Link
WCheckBox = CheckBox
WRadioButton = RadioButton
WTable = Table

 

There may be some special cases that do fall under one of these classtypes but these types should cover approximately 90% to 95% of all test object classes.

 

The <DescriptiveObjectName> should be a descriptive object name in "Proper" case format (each word in the descriptive object name is capitalized for easier identification i.e. MyDescriptiveObject).

 

For example, if I were naming the getter for the "Teamspace Name" text field object it would like this:

getText_TeamSpaceName()

 

4. appobject class files should have a unique name beginning with a capital letter (i.e. Applications.java)

The appobjects automation directory and any of it's subdirectories should be in all lower case characters (i.e. appobjects.administration.admin_console.users) but the appobjects class file name should begin with a capital letter.

 

5. All appobject class files should eventually contain unit tests.

You can easily add unit tests to your appobject file by running the unittest.UnitTestMain script on your appobjects class file.

1. For every appobject class file (i.e. SearchPage, Teamspace, etc. ) for which you want a unit test generated, make an entry in the UnitTestMain script's vector using "v.add" (i.e. v.add(new Teamspace());   )
2. Add import statements as necessary.
3. Check out your appobjects files if they are under source control.
4. Then execute the UnitTestMain script.

The UnitTestMain script will generate a unit test section in your script that looks like the following:

 

 public void testMain (Object[] args)
 {
  og.verifyGetter(getButton_Cancel(), "getButton_Cancel()");
  og.verifyGetter(getButton_OK(), "getButton_OK()");
  }

  

The unit test, when executed, will verify that all of the test objects in your appobjects class file exist on the current browser page and are identifiable by the automation.

 

6. Generally, all necessary external classes are instantiated at the top of an appobjects class file directly below the class statement.

See the placement of the Browser b = new Browser(); statement below. If all of our class files use this area of the script to instantiate other classes it will be easier to find object reference variables, etc.

 

7. As a rule the appobjects folder should contain only test object library files. These test object library files should contain only test object getter methods. The getter methods should do nothing but return an object.

 

8. appobject class files (or tasks files) should not reference/import testcases files.

 

appobjects and tasks files should never reference (import) testcases files. testcases files (Scripts) can and should import the necessary tasks and appobjects files but not vice-versa. A tasks or appobjects file that imports a testcases file will cause a compile error when removing the imported testcases file from the datastore. tasks and appobjects files should never import testcases files.

独立储能的现货电能量与调频辅助服务市场出清协调机制(Matlab代码实现)内容概要:本文围绕“独立储能的现货电能量与调频辅助服务市场出清协调机制”展开,提出了一种基于Matlab代码实现的优化模型,旨在协调独立储能系统在电力现货市场与调频辅助服务市场中的联合出清问题。文中结合鲁棒优化、大M法和C&CG算法处理不确定性因素,构建了多市场耦合的双层或两阶段优化框架,实现了储能资源在能量市场和辅助服务市场间的最优分配。研究涵盖了市场出清机制设计、储能运行策略建模、不确定性建模及求解算法实现,并通过Matlab仿真验证了所提方法的有效性和经济性。; 适合人群:具备一定电力系统基础知识和Matlab编程能力的研究生、科研人员及从事电力市场、储能调度相关工作的工程技术人员。; 使用场景及目标:①用于研究独立储能在多电力市场环境下的协同优化运行机制;②支撑电力市场机制设计、储能参与市场的竞价策略分析及政策仿真;③为学术论文复现、课题研究和技术开发提供可运行的代码参考。; 阅读建议:建议读者结合文档中提供的Matlab代码与算法原理同步学习,重点关注模型构建逻辑、不确定性处理方式及C&CG算法的具体实现步骤,宜在掌握基础优化理论的前提下进行深入研读与仿真调试。
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值