Should angular $watch be removed when scope destroyed?

本文探讨了在AngularJS中当$scope被销毁时,是否需要手动取消watchers和listeners的注册。结论指出,对于作用域内的watchers无需手动取消注册,因为它们会在作用域销毁时自动清除。然而,注册在其他作用域上的事件监听器则需要手动取消。

$scope上的watchers和listeners在$scope destroy的时候是否需要手动unregister

这里有讨论: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/25113884/should-angular-watch-be-removed-when-scope-destroyed

结论是: No, you don't need to remove $$watchers, since they will effectively get removed once the scope is destroyed.

From Angular's source code (v1.2.21), Scope's $destroy method:

$destroy: function() {
    ...
    if (parent.$$childHead == this) parent.$$childHead = this.$$nextSibling;
    if (parent.$$childTail == this) parent.$$childTail = this.$$prevSibling;
    if (this.$$prevSibling) this.$$prevSibling.$$nextSibling = this.$$nextSibling;
    if (this.$$nextSibling) this.$$nextSibling.$$prevSibling = this.$$prevSibling;
    ...
    this.$$watchers = this.$$asyncQueue = this.$$postDigestQueue = [];

So, the $$watchers array is emptied (and the scope is removed from the scope hierarchy).

Removing the watcher from the array is all the unregister function does anyway:

$watch: function(watchExp, listener, objectEquality) {
    ...
    return function deregisterWatch() {
        arrayRemove(array, watcher);
        lastDirtyWatch = null;
    };
}

So, there is no point in unregistering the $$watchers "manually".

You should still unregister event listeners though (as you correctly mention in your post) !

NOTE: You only need to unregister listeners registered on other scopes. There is no need to unregister listeners registered on the scope that is being destroyed. E.g.:

// You MUST unregister these
$rootScope.$on(...);
$scope.$parent.$on(...);

// You DON'T HAVE to unregister this
$scope.$on(...)

(Thx to @John for pointing it out)

Also, make sure you unregister any event listeners from elements that outlive the scope being destroyed. E.g. if you have a directive register a listener on the parent node or on <body>, then you must unregister them too. Again, you don't have to remove a listener registered on the element being destroyed.

Kind of unrelated to the original question, but now there is also a $destroyed event dispatched on the element being destroyed, so you can hook into that as well (if it's appropriate for your usecase):

link: function postLink(scope, elem) {
  doStuff();
  elem.on('$destroy', cleanUp);
}

转载于:https://my.oschina.net/uniquejava/blog/820203

评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值