52 questions to ask before accepting a science job ——科研之路

职业发展专家Joanne Kamens在AAAS年会上分享了科学家在考虑新机会时应该询问的52个问题,帮助他们在理性思考基础上做出选择,避免仅凭直觉决策。这些问题涉及工作满意度、职位大小、竞争环境、直接上司、技能发展、行业转换可能性、薪酬福利等多个方面,为即将踏入科学领域的专业人士提供了宝贵的决策指南。

For most of us, there’s no such thing as the perfect job offer. Even when we have an ideal in mind, when it comes to real life opportunities, there is usually some sort of compromise involved. At the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), taking place in Boston this week, career development expert and Executive Director of Addgene, Joanne Kamens, spoke about the kinds of questions all scientists should ask of a new opportunity to find out if it’s right for them.

Most importantly, Kamens says, remember that taking on a new job is not the final decision – you can always change your mind, or move on to other things if it’s not for you. But asking the right questions before making that decision means you can base your choices on rational thinking rather than gut feelings. So here they are.

What should I be looking for in a job?

The most important thing for job satisfaction, contrary to popular belief, is not salary but engagement. Research shows that salary and benefits are less important for job satisfaction than how much you feel you belong, are valued, and are contributing.

To work out whether you’ll get that out of a new job, try to find out about the opportunities there will be for you to learn and grow, Kamens advises. Will the work challenge you? Are there resources in place to help you cope with the pressures and maintain a good work-life balance – what support is available?

You should also pay close attention to the working environment. Can you see yourself there; do you fit in? And what about the values or the organization? Are they similar to your own?

To answer these questions you need to know yourself and what suits your style, so take some time to consider that before setting out to gather this information.

How big is it?

Size matters, says Kamens. Find out how big the lab or company is and whether it has grown over time. If not, why not (it’s not necessarily a bad thing if it has stayed that size on purpose, but it could be a sign that it’s a stagnant workplace)? For lab jobs in particular, ask whether there are enough projects to go around. What will your initial responsibilities be and how fast can you get your own projects? If you are good at asking for help then a big company might be fine for you, but others may feel lost in that environment. Do you come from a big family? Does hustle and bustle make you edgy? Visit the place and ask yourself how it feels to you.

How competitive is the workplace?

Many workplaces, and labs in particular, tend to fall into one of two categories – ‘dog eat dog’ vs ‘team attitude’. There are ways to tell which one your potential new workplace falls into. In collaborative labs, for instance, papers have multiple authors, whereas in highly competitive labs it will probably just be the PI and one other who publish each paper. Ask yourself whether you like and thrive on competition. Some people do, but you need to accept whether that will make you happy before entering that kind of environment.

Who will be my real boss?

This will depend on the size of the lab or company. Find out who will manage you in the day-to-day. Will it be the person who is hiring you or, say, a post-doc? Ask whether there is a chance your hiring manager will be moving on soon. For a lab, is the advisor really around serving as a mentor? Do you care? Ask the graduate students and the post-docs there whether they meet one-on-one with the lab head, and how often these meetings take place.

Do I want this person as my mentor?

This question is most important if you are looking for a position in a training lab. Once you know who will be leading the group, you need to find out whether they are going to be teaching you the kind of stuff you really need to know to move your career forwards. What’s their involvement in the rest of the department? How good are they at getting funding? Can they deal with conflict in their lab? Do they motivate their group with encouragement or criticism?

Kamens stresses that if you are a grad student or a post-doc, you are going to be working at the mercy of this person for very little money for a protracted period of time. You are supposed to be learning the skills you need to be a good scientist and how to run a lab well. So there really is no need to “work for a jerk”, she says. When it comes to a job, it’s a different story, and you may indeed have less choice in the kind of person you have to put up with as your boss.

Trying to find out all this information about the person who is hiring you can be tricky, so when you have an interview in a lab, try and meet as many of the lab members as possible. Preferably, ask them for a coffee out of the lab where you can talk to them more openly. Ask them whether they respect the PI, whether they are learning from them, whether people in the lab socialise together? These sorts of questions will give you some good hints towards the truth.

Will I be expanding my skill set every day?

You have to care about this, especially as a post-doc or grad student, says Kamens. Half of projects fail, she says, so you need to know how many things you can work on, how many other things you will learn.

Another important question is: do people stay a very long time? Staying too long in post-doc position is bad news because it makes it look like you can’t execute, Kamens says, which is especially crucial if you want to move to industry. If grad students have been in the lab for 10 years and haven’t graduated, don’t go there. They are probably being kept on as cheap labour!

It’s easy to look up alumni, so see who used to be there and where they went on to. Network with people who have left, for instance by contacting them on LinkedIn – this is all data that will help you to make a good decision.

Can I transition to industry?

55% of scientists will leave academia, and if you are already thinking about a future step into industry, choose a lab that is open to both industry and academia. For instance, is the supervisor on boards for companies, or have they founded their own company? What is their connection with industry and how do they feel about it? Did ex-lab members go into industry or academia? Does the advisor support both paths? Is the work applicable to industry? And does the publication record show evidence of industry collaboration?

Are there any warning signs?

Look out for people speaking disrespectfully of each other or the supervisor. Also, be suspicious if you aren’t given the opportunity to speak to other employees by yourself, without a senior member there. Do people seem to be hiding their work and are they not upfront in discussing their findings?  Do you have a gut feeling that these people are putting on a fake-happy façade for an interview? If you answer yes to any of these questions, think twice.

What about the money?

Don’t be shy about asking whether you can get more money, moving expenses, conference funds, day care subsidy, extra teaching stipend, and so on. Also, don’t forget to ask whether the position is dependent on a grant application. Look around for clues as to what kind of work-life balance you can expect. Is there a culture of flexibility?

As you ask these questions and do your research, write a pros and cons list, Kamens suggests. Ask others for advice. And understand you have choices: you can always change your mind.

Dr. Kamens received her PhD in Genetics from Harvard Medical School then spent 15 years at BASF/Abbott where she led discovery research projects on small molecule and antibody approaches to inflammatory diseases, ultimately serving as Group Leader in Molecular Biology.   In 2007 she joined RXi Pharmaceuticals as Director of Discovery and concluded there as Senior Director of Research Collaborations.  In 2011, Dr. Kamens became the Executive Director of Addgene, a mission driven, non-profit dedicated to helping scientists around the world collaborate. Dr. Kamens founded the Boston chapter of AWIS and served as a Director at large of Mentoring for the Healthcare Businesswomen’s Association Boston Chapter. She serves on a number of other non-profit boards and speaks widely on career development topics in person and via Webinar.    Follow her on Twitter: @jkamens  www.linkedin.com/in/joannekamens 

 

转自NATURE JOBS | NATURE JOBS BLOG

52 questions to ask before accepting a science job

内容概要:本文详细介绍了“秒杀商城”微服务架构的设计与实战全过程,涵盖系统从需求分析、服务拆分、技术选型到核心功能开发、分布式事务处理、容器化部署及监控链路追踪的完整流程。重点解决了高并发场景下的超卖问题,采用Redis预减库存、消息队列削峰、数据库乐观锁等手段保障数据一致性,并通过Nacos实现服务注册发现与配置管理,利用Seata处理跨服务分布式事务,结合RabbitMQ实现异步下单,提升系统吞吐能力。同时,项目支持Docker Compose快速部署和Kubernetes生产级编排,集成Sleuth+Zipkin链路追踪与Prometheus+Grafana监控体系,构建可观测性强的微服务系统。; 适合人群:具备Java基础和Spring Boot开发经验,熟悉微服务基本概念的中高级研发人员,尤其是希望深入理解高并发系统设计、分布式事务、服务治理等核心技术的开发者;适合工作2-5年、有志于转型微服务或提升架构能力的工程师; 使用场景及目标:①学习如何基于Spring Cloud Alibaba构建完整的微服务项目;②掌握秒杀场景下高并发、超卖控制、异步化、削峰填谷等关键技术方案;③实践分布式事务(Seata)、服务熔断降级、链路追踪、统一配置中心等企业级中间件的应用;④完成从本地开发到容器化部署的全流程落地; 阅读建议:建议按照文档提供的七个阶段循序渐进地动手实践,重点关注秒杀流程设计、服务间通信机制、分布式事务实现和系统性能优化部分,结合代码调试与监控工具深入理解各组件协作原理,真正掌握高并发微服务系统的构建能力。
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值