My Java NIO Selector is implemented using select() so it blocks until any of these occur:
a registered channel is ready
it is wakeup()'ed
the thread is interrupted
From this, I made a few assumptions about the case where select() returns 0:
it must've been reason 2. or 3.
selectedKeys() should return an empty ResultSet
I don't need to call selectedKeys() and can continue to the next loop iteration where select() will be called again
However, I encountered situations where select() returned 0 although there is a ready channel. selectedKeys() returns a Set with 1 SelectionKey as expected.
Even several calls to select() would always return 0 until the channel was processed and the SelectionKey was removed. This situation basically ends up in an endless loop as select() does not block but always instantly return 0.
Simplified code:
Selector selector = Selector.open();
SocketChannel channel;
for (...) { // for each node
// Create and connect channels...
...
channel.configureBlocking(false);
channel.register(selector, SelectionKey.OP_READ, someRelatedObject);
}
int ready;
Set readyKeys;
while (true) {
ready = selector.select();
readyKeys = selector.selectedKeys();
System.out.println("Ready channels: " + ready);
System.out.println("Selected channels: " + readyKeys.size());
if (ready == 0) {
continue;
}
for (SelectionKey key : readyKeys) {
if (key.isValid() && key.isReadable()) {
// Take action...
}
readyKeys.remove(key);
}
}
Why does select() return 0 although there is a ready channel?
What is the suggested way of dealing with this?
EDIT:
Changing this:
for (SelectionKey key : readyKeys) {
if (key.isValid() && key.isReadable()) {
// Take action...
}
readyKeys.remove(key);
}
to this
for (SelectionKey key : readyKeys) {
readyKeys.remove(key);
if (key.isValid() && key.isReadable()) {
// Take action...
}
}
solved the problem. In some cases, the code would continue the for loop before remove()ing the key.
EDIT 2:
I just recently learned that my foreach loop over the selected keys set is bad. foreach uses the set's iterator. Modifying a collection directly (not via the iterator's methods) while iterating over it may result in "arbitrary, undeterministic" behavior.
The selected keys set may provide a fail-fast iterator. Fail-fast iterators detect such modifications and throw a ConcurrentModificationException upon the next iteration. So modifying the set in a foreach either risks undeterministic behavior or may cause exceptions - depending on the iterator implementation.
Solution: don't use foreach. Use the iterator and remove the key via iterator.remove().
Iterator iterator;
SelectionKey key;
while (true) {
// ...
iterator = selector.selectedKeys().iterator();
while (iterator.hasNext()) {
key = iterator.next();
iterator.remove();
// ...
}
}
解决方案
select() returns the number of keys that have changed. So if a key was already ready before the select() call then it could return 0 but selectedKeys could be non-empty.