Strings and IOStreams: STL implementations comparison

最新推荐文章于 2024-06-05 00:21:28 发布

weixin_30933531

最新推荐文章于 2024-06-05 00:21:28 发布

阅读量50

点赞数

CC 4.0 BY-SA版权

原文链接：http://www.cnblogs.com/oiramario/archive/2006/02/20/333832.html

本文对比了STLport (v.5.0.1) 和 libstd++ 中字符串及部分输入输出流的实现。通过实验评估了不同字符串复制算法的时间复杂度以及分配器的选择，并基于STLport的字符串和绳索以及libstd++的字符串进行了详细的比较。

摘要生成于 C知道，由 DeepSeek-R1 满血版支持，前往体验 >

http://complement.sourceforge.net/compare.pdf

This article present comparison of strings (and some iostreams features) implementation in STLport (v. 5.0.1) and libstd++. This tests also can help to answer on questions: is it strings copy algorithm with constant complexity better than algorithm with linear complexity? What allocator is better? This comparison is done on the base of STLport strings, ropes and libstd++ strings. I expect that this results will help to make decision between STL implementations as well proper choice of strings implementation.

转载于:https://www.cnblogs.com/oiramario/archive/2006/02/20/333832.html