Kernel开发 - SubmittingPatches，有关ifdef和static inline & macro

From: Documentation/SubmittingPatches

 

2) #ifdefs are ugly

Code cluttered with ifdefs is difficult to read and maintain.  Don't do

it.  Instead, put your ifdefs in a header, and conditionally define

'static inline' functions, or macros, which are used in the code.

Let the compiler optimize away the "no-op" case.

Simple example, of poor code:

        dev = alloc_etherdev (sizeof(struct funky_private));

        if (!dev)

                return -ENODEV;

        #ifdef CONFIG_NET_FUNKINESS

        init_funky_net(dev);

        #endif

Cleaned-up example:

(in header)

        #ifndef CONFIG_NET_FUNKINESS

        static inline void init_funky_net (struct net_device *d) {}

        #endif

(in the code itself)

        dev = alloc_etherdev (sizeof(struct funky_private));

        if (!dev)

                return -ENODEV;

        init_funky_net(dev);

3) 'static inline' is better than a macro

Static inline functions are greatly preferred over macros.

They provide type safety, have no length limitations, no formatting

limitations, and under gcc they are as cheap as macros.

Macros should only be used for cases where a static inline is clearly

suboptimal [there are a few, isolated cases of this in fast paths],

or where it is impossible to use a static inline function [such as

string-izing].

'static inline' is preferred over 'static __inline__', 'extern inline',

and 'extern __inline__'.

转载于:https://www.cnblogs.com/super119/archive/2013/01/14/2859919.html