JavaScript Patterns 3.6 Regular Expression Literal

最新推荐文章于 2024-11-02 20:56:16 发布

转载最新推荐文章于 2024-11-02 20:56:16 发布 · 716 阅读

0 ·

CC 4.0 BY-SA版权

原文链接：http://www.cnblogs.com/haokaibo/p/Regular-Expression-Literal.html

文章标签：

#javascript #ViewUI

本文介绍了使用正则表达式字面量和构造函数创建正则表达式的方法，包括全局匹配、多行匹配和不区分大小写的匹配等特性，并对比了两者之间的区别。

摘要生成于 C知道，由 DeepSeek-R1 满血版支持，前往体验 >

1. Using the new RegExp() constructor

// constructor

var re = new RegExp("\\\\", "gm");

2. Using the regular expression literal

// regular expression literal

var re = /\\/gm;

when using the RegExp()constructor, you also need to escape quotes and often you need to double-escape backslashes, as shown in the preceding snippet.

Regular Expression Literal Syntax

• g—Global matching

• m—Multiline

• i—Case-insensitive matching

var no_letters = "abc123XYZ".replace(/[a-z]/gi, "");

console.log(no_letters); // 123

Another distinction between the regular expression literal and the constructor is that the literal creates an object only once during parse time.

function getRE() {

    var re = /[a-z]/;

    re.foo = "bar";

    return re;

}

var reg = getRE(),

       re2 = getRE();

console.log(reg === re2); // true 
// Kaibo(20140602): For now this result should be false in ES5(Tested in Chrome)

reg.foo = "baz";

console.log(re2.foo); // "baz"

Note

This behavior has changed in ES5 and the literal also creates new objects. The behavior has also been corrected in many browser environments, so it’s not to be relied on.
And one last note that calling RegExp() without new(as a function, not as a constructor) behaves the same as with new.

转载于:https://www.cnblogs.com/haokaibo/p/Regular-Expression-Literal.html