Meaning of “const” last in a C++ method declaration?

函数尾部的const是什么意思？

1 Answer by Jnick Bernnet

A "const function", denoted with the keyword const after a function declaration, makes it a compiler error for this class function to change a member variable of the class. However, reading of a class variables is ok inside of the function, but writing inside of this function will generate a compiler error.

Another way of thinking about such "const function" is by viewing an class function as a normal function taking an implicit this pointer. So a method int Foo::Bar(int random_arg) (without the const at the end) results in a function like int Foo_Bar(Foo* this, int random_arg), and a call such as Foo f; f.Bar(4) will internally correspond to something like Foo f; Foo_Bar(&f, 4). Now adding the const at the end (int Foo::Bar(int random_arg) const) can then be understood as a declaration with a const this pointer: int Foo_Bar(const Foo* this, int random_arg). Since the type of this in such case is const, no modifications of member variables are possible.

It is possible to loosen the "const function" restriction of not allowing the function to write to any variable of a class. To allow some of the variables to be writable even when the function is marked as a "const function", these class variables are marked with the keyword mutable. Thus, if a class variable is marked as mutable, and a "const function" writes to this variable then the code will compile cleanly and the variable is possible to change. (C++11)

As usual when dealing with the const keyword, changing the location of the const key word in a C++ statement has entirely different meanings. The above usage of const only apply when adding const to the end of the function declaration after the parenthesis. const is a highly overused qualifier in C++ and the syntax and ordering is often not straightforward in combination with pointers. Some readings about const correctness and the const keyword:

转载于:https://www.cnblogs.com/xuanyuanchen/p/7443004.html