A Single Channel with Multiple Consumers RabbitMQ

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/30696351/a-single-channel-with-multiple-consumers-rabbitmq

 

 

up vote 0down votefavorite

Typically the IModel.BasicConsume() registration is used to connect a single consumer through a single channel. However, the documentation is clear that multiple consumers can be registered through a single channel. For example: Channel channel = ...; Consumer consumer1 = ...; Consumer consumer2 = ...; channel.basicQos(10); // Per consumer limit channel.basicConsume("my-queue1", false, consumer1); channel.basicConsume("my-queue2", false, consumer2); The above snippet is taken from this link. The documentation goes on to clarify the disadvantage of doing this: Each Channel has its own dispatch thread. For the most common use case of one Consumer per Channel, this means Consumers do not hold up other Consumers. If you have multiple Consumers per Channel be aware that a long-running Consumer may hold up dispatch of callbacks to other Consumers on that Channel. The disadvantage is spelled out clearly. What is missing is the explanation of why positively it may be useful to do this. Does anyone know? What is the advantage? Furthermore, there is another similar scenario to consider. Evidently it is also possible to multiply register the same consumer. Channel channel = ...; Consumer consumer = ...; channel.basicConsume("my-queue1", false, "queue1-Tag", consumer); channel.basicConsume("my-queue2", false, "queue2-Tag", consumer); In this latter case it is actually easier to envision the advantage; it allows multiple Rabbit queues to be multiplexed into a single event stream. But if it has that advantage, why is this approach so esoteric and completely undocumented? What makes this particularly weird is that the whole idea of a consumerTag ("queue1-Tag" and "queue2-Tag") seems to exist to support this scenario. Please note: Is it possible for one consumer (one QueueingBasicConsumer) to register to multiple queues and have messages continually sent to it? Certainly it is. When registering a Consumer you (either nominate, or) get a (server-generated) consumer tag, essentially an identifier for the Consumer. You only have to keep a map of tags so that the Consumer can know (when it is called) for which registration this callback is being made. If you have a single channel connection to RabbitMQ, then the Consumers (each registration looks like a Consumer to the server) get called serially, so there is no concurrency. If you have many channels you can register for different queues on different channels and the distinct channels' callbacks can run concurrently. The above Q&A came from this link. If this is why consumerTag identifiers are used, why is this not stated clearly in the official documentation? So to review the two scenarios: What is the advantage of having multiple consumers registered through a single channel? Why are multiple registrations of a single consumer practically discussed nowhere, even though it provides a seemingly self-evident benefit? I'm coding in the context of .net and C#, though this question is really about RabbitMQ in general. c#  .net  rabbitmq  amqp

转载于:https://www.cnblogs.com/diegodu/p/4980941.html