understanding process and update

本文详细解释了JavaServer Faces (JSF) 和 PrimeFaces 框架中 process 和 update 属性的功能及用法。process 属性用于指定哪些组件需要在表单提交时被处理,而 update 属性则用于确定哪些组件需要更新。

摘要生成于 C知道 ,由 DeepSeek-R1 满血版支持, 前往体验 >

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/25339056/understanding-process-and-update-attributes-of-primefaces

process

The process attribute is server side and can only affect UIComponents implementing EditableValueHolder (input fields) or ActionSource (command fields). The process attribute tells JSF by a spaceseparated collection of client IDs which components exactly must be processed through the entire JSF lifecycle upon (partial) form submit. This covers applying the request values (finding HTTP request parameter based on component's own client ID and then either setting it as submitted value in case of EditableValueHolder components or queueing a new ActionEvent in case of ActionSource components), performing conversion, validation and updating the model values (EditableValueHolder components only) and finally invoking the queued ActionEvent (ActionSource components only). JSF will skip processing of all other components which are not covered by process attribute.

Note that it's in case of ActionSource components (such as <p:commandButton>) very important that you also include the component itself in the process attribute, particularly if you intend to invoke the action associated with the component. So the below example which intends to process only certain input component(s) when a certain command component is invoked ain't gonna work:

<p:inputText id="foo" value="#{bean.foo}" />
<p:commandButton process="foo" action="#{bean.action}" />

It would only process the #{bean.foo} and not the #{bean.action}. You'd need to include the command component itself as well:

<p:inputText id="foo" value="#{bean.foo}" />
<p:commandButton process="@this foo" action="#{bean.action}" />

Or, as you apparently found out, using @parent if they happen to be the only components having a common parent:

<p:panel><!-- Type doesn't matter, as long as it's a common parent. -->
    <p:inputText id="foo" value="#{bean.foo}" />
    <p:commandButton process="@parent" action="#{bean.action}" />
</p:panel>

Or, if they both happen to be the only components of the parent UIForm component, then you can also use @form:

<h:form>
    <p:inputText id="foo" value="#{bean.foo}" />
    <p:commandButton process="@form" action="#{bean.action}" />
</h:form>

This is sometimes undesirable if the form contains more input components which you'd like to skip in processing, more than often in cases when you'd like to update another input component(s) or some UI section based on the current input component in an ajax listener method. You namely don't want that validation errors on other input components are preventing the ajax listener method from being executed.

Then there's the @all. This has no special effect in process attribute, but only in update attribute. A process="@all" behaves exactly the same as process="@form". HTML doesn't support submitting multiple forms at once anyway.

There's by the way also a @none which may be useful in case you absolutely don't need to process anything, but only want to update some specific parts via update, particularly those sections whose content doesn't depend on submitted values or action listeners.

The standard JSF equivalent to the PrimeFaces specific process is execute from <f:ajax execute>. It behaves exactly the same expect that it doesn't support a commaseparated string while the PrimeFaces one does (although I personally recommend to just stick to spaceseparated convention). Also, it may be useful to know that <p:commandXxx process> defaults to @form while <p:ajax process> and <f:ajax execute> defaults to @this. Finally, it's also useful to know that process supports the so-called "PrimeFaces Selectors", see also How do PrimeFaces Selectors as in update="@(.myClass)" work?


update

The update attribute is client side and can affect the HTML representation of all UIComponents. The update attribute tells JavaScript (the one responsible for handling the ajax request/response) by a spaceseparated collection of client IDs which parts in the HTML DOM tree need to be updated as response to the form submit. JSF will then prepare the right ajax response for that, containing only the requested parts to update. JSF will skip all other components which are not covered by update attribute in the ajax response, hereby keeping the response payload small.

Usually, you'd like to update only the components which really need to be "refreshed" in the client side upon (partial) form submit. The example below updates the entire parent form via @form:

<h:form>
    <p:inputText id="foo" value="#{bean.foo}" required="true" />
    <p:message id="foo_m" for="foo" />
    <p:inputText id="bar" value="#{bean.bar}" required="true" />
    <p:message id="bar_m" for="bar" />
    <p:commandButton action="#{bean.action}" update="@form" />
</h:form>

(note that process attribute is omitted as that defaults to @form already)

Whilst that may work fine, the update of input and command components is in this particular example unnecessary. Unless you change the model values foo and bar inside action method (which would in turn be unintuitive in UX perspective), there's no point of updating them. The message components are the only which really need to be updated:

<h:form>
    <p:inputText id="foo" value="#{bean.foo}" required="true" />
    <p:message id="foo_m" for="foo" />
    <p:inputText id="bar" value="#{bean.bar}" required="true" />
    <p:message id="bar_m" for="bar" />
    <p:commandButton action="#{bean.action}" update="foo_m bar_m" />
</h:form>

However, that gets tedious when you have many of them. That's one of the reasons why PrimeFaces Selectors exist. Those message components have in the generated HTML output a common style class of ui-message, so the following should also do:

<h:form>
    <p:inputText id="foo" value="#{bean.foo}" required="true" />
    <p:message id="foo_m" for="foo" />
    <p:inputText id="bar" value="#{bean.bar}" required="true" />
    <p:message id="bar_m" for="bar" />
    <p:commandButton action="#{bean.action}" update="@(.ui-message)" />
</h:form>

(note that you should keep the IDs on message components, otherwise @(...) won't work! Again, see How do PrimeFaces Selectors as in update="@(.myClass)" work? for detail)

The @parent updates only the parent component, which thus covers the current component and all siblings and their children. This is more useful if you have separated the form in sane groups with each its own responsibility. The @this updates, obviously, only the current component. Normally, this is only necessary when you need to change one of the component's own HTML attributes in the action method. E.g.

<p:commandButton action="#{bean.action}" update="@this" 
    oncomplete="doSomething('#{bean.value}')" />

Imagine that the oncomplete needs to work with the value which is changed in action, then this construct wouldn't have worked if the component isn't updated, for the simple reason that oncomplete is part of generated HTML output (and thus all EL expressions in there are evaluated during render response).

The @all updates the entire document, which should be used with care. Normally, you'd like to use a true GET request for this instead by either a plain link (<a> or <h:link>) or a redirect-after-POST by ?faces-redirect=true or ExternalContext#redirect(). In effects, process="@form" update="@all" has exactly the same effect as a non-ajax (non-partial) submit. In my entire JSF career, the only sensible use case I encountered for @all is to display an error page in its entirety in case an exception occurs during an ajax request. See also What is the correct way to deal with JSF 2.0 exceptions for AJAXified components?

The standard JSF equivalent to the PrimeFaces specific update is render from <f:ajax render>. It behaves exactly the same expect that it doesn't support a commaseparated string while the PrimeFaces one does (although I personally recommend to just stick to spaceseparated convention). Both update and render defaults to @none (which is, "nothing").

内容概要:本文深入探讨了Kotlin语言在函数式编程和跨平台开发方面的特性和优势,结合详细的代码案例,展示了Kotlin的核心技巧和应用场景。文章首先介绍了高阶函数和Lambda表达式的使用,解释了它们如何简化集合操作和回调函数处理。接着,详细讲解了Kotlin Multiplatform(KMP)的实现方式,包括共享模块的创建和平台特定模块的配置,展示了如何通过共享业务逻辑代码提高开发效率。最后,文章总结了Kotlin在Android开发、跨平台移动开发、后端开发和Web开发中的应用场景,并展望了其未来发展趋势,指出Kotlin将继续在函数式编程和跨平台开发领域不断完善和发展。; 适合人群:对函数式编程和跨平台开发感兴趣的开发者,尤其是有一定编程基础的Kotlin初学者和中级开发者。; 使用场景及目标:①理解Kotlin中高阶函数和Lambda表达式的使用方法及其在实际开发中的应用场景;②掌握Kotlin Multiplatform的实现方式,能够在多个平台上共享业务逻辑代码,提高开发效率;③了解Kotlin在不同开发领域的应用场景,为选择合适的技术栈提供参考。; 其他说明:本文不仅提供了理论知识,还结合了大量代码案例,帮助读者更好地理解和实践Kotlin的函数式编程特性和跨平台开发能力。建议读者在学习过程中动手实践代码案例,以加深理解和掌握。
内容概要:本文深入探讨了利用历史速度命令(HVC)增强仿射编队机动控制性能的方法。论文提出了HVC在仿射编队控制中的潜在价值,通过全面评估HVC对系统的影响,提出了易于测试的稳定性条件,并给出了延迟参数与跟踪误差关系的显式不等式。研究为两轮差动机器人(TWDRs)群提供了系统的协调编队机动控制方案,并通过9台TWDRs的仿真和实验验证了稳定性和综合性能改进。此外,文中还提供了详细的Python代码实现,涵盖仿射编队控制类、HVC增强、稳定性条件检查以及仿真实验。代码不仅实现了论文的核心思想,还扩展了邻居历史信息利用、动态拓扑优化和自适应控制等性能提升策略,更全面地反映了群体智能协作和性能优化思想。 适用人群:具备一定编程基础,对群体智能、机器人编队控制、时滞系统稳定性分析感兴趣的科研人员和工程师。 使用场景及目标:①理解HVC在仿射编队控制中的应用及其对系统性能的提升;②掌握仿射编队控制的具体实现方法,包括控制器设计、稳定性分析和仿真实验;③学习如何通过引入历史信息(如HVC)来优化群体智能系统的性能;④探索中性型时滞系统的稳定性条件及其在实际系统中的应用。 其他说明:此资源不仅提供了理论分析,还包括完整的Python代码实现,帮助读者从理论到实践全面掌握仿射编队控制技术。代码结构清晰,涵盖了从初始化配置、控制律设计到性能评估的各个环节,并提供了丰富的可视化工具,便于理解和分析系统性能。通过阅读和实践,读者可以深入了解HVC增强仿射编队控制的工作原理及其实际应用效果。
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值